It is commonly believed that handling with the global environmental issues in the most excellent way requires the increase in the fuel cost. Looking from my perspective, I totally disagree with this view due to some reasons that are shed light on in this essay.
To commence with, in this day and age, it can be seen that fuels are principally used for transports and their flumes clearly result in air pollution in many nations in this day and age. However, global environmental problems stem from not only fuels but also other detrimental factors such as garbages, global demand for cultivation and habitation which coud lead to the deforestation. Were people to have a decrease in these negative activities, it could lead to other pollutions such as water pollution and soil pollution. For instance, millions of plastic materials are released into the sea annually, resulting in the severely sea water pollution and the death of aquatic animals because they accidentally eat these materials.
In addition, if the fuel cost rises dramatically, the increase in the cost of other problems is negatively unevitable. Which means, many peole who are in the financial difficulties nearly could not cope with this situation, it could lead to their problematic challenges in many aspects of their lives. To be more distinctive, together with the rise in fuel, the increase in travelling fees can prevent people from renting public transports such as buses, taxis, etc. Moreover, sereve conflicts about sources of fuels is what the world can potentially face, and the subsequence of this could be the crisis in many poor countries.
In conclusion, I firmly disagree with the view that is mentioned due to the fact that not only are fuels main factors, but there also are more and more factors such as garbages, deforestation, etc. Furthermore, global residents could face up to the financial problems along with the rise in fuel cost, as well as many global arguments in disputing sources of fuels.