People have different views as to whether the spread of chemicals and advanced machinery results in the growth of food supplies. While there are several factors justifying damage to such advancements, I believe that they do more good than harm.
Opponents of using fertilizers and agricultural machinery cite various reasons to support their stance. When farmers use extreme amounts of pesticides, herbicides, and modern agricultural technologies, leading to low-quality food cultivation, they tend to significantly contribute to the increase of chronic diseases. This situation may not only put a considerable burden on the healthcare systems but also lead to poor performance of individuals at work. This scenario is particularly detrimental for underdeveloped countries that are already grappling with inadequate health services and inferior national productivity.
Despite these arguments, in my opinion, implementation of fertilizers and agricultural machinery can remarkably improve individuals’ and communities’ lives. Because incorporating chemicals and machinery allows farmers to maximize crop cultivation, which is vital to meet increasing needs of society. In light of this abundance of produce, it is not surprising to see the decline in prices. Given this affordability, it is very likely to reduce the number of citizens suffering from insufficient food distribution. In a world where more and more people are struggling with famine, taking advantage of modern technologies and chemical additives in order to boost food production takes on added significance.
In conclusion, although the application of fertilizers and advanced farming machinery may carry potential health risks, I am convinced that the benefits are more significant than the concerns. Only through the integration of chemicals and technological tools in agriculture can we ensure food security for the nations across the world.