It is assumed that using a mobile phone to sit at the same table is as antisocial as smoking, thus both acts need to be restricted in public areas. To some degree, it is true that continuously focusing on the screen has some effect on our social interaction but it does not outweigh the dangerous effect of smoking on our health, and banning it is too much.
A ban may infringe on personal freedom because every individual has the right to use the mobile phone as they see fit. In addition, smartphones have a lot of contribution to productivity, access to various information, and remote work capabilities. Banning the use of this technology could hinder people’s flexibility to perform multitasking work efficiently mainly in this situation where access to the internet is essential. Were excessive use still a crucial issue in society, promoting education and awareness is required to balance individual freedom and the need for responsible use.
Smartphone usage has become a partial part of modern life where society is adapting the technological advancements. In this situation, banning it in the public space could be challenging and resource-intensive. Therefore, encouraging responsible and mindful use may be more practical than a ban, and promoting awareness campaigns or designating phone-free zones looks feasible.
In conclusion, continuous smartphone use in public spaces should be banned as smoking involves balanced consideration between individual freedom, societal norms, and public area usage. It is better to create awareness, education, and feasible approaches than ban it.