$ In Austrdia and Brition both country Judges are unable to entrence to the previous data of Crim- inal, This, way they can easily realse Nowaday lowyer recommended this Way Should change anda jury should analyse the past fact before make their oppinion. In this essay i will Pertially agree with statement and Support later
There number of reason why Judge fare access criminal past information Firstly, human are day. Their intensions hange day by are not same like every day. They alable to Switch their mood at any situation so authorities flow. it and they donot provide all of data of criminals. More over, it is better to stay in present rather then past. It is not true if a Person good at previous day they will better also future as well present. From my eyes it is meaning less. it might be, Judges should always make Panishment imagine about the present For example. I read true story from a famouse novel where writer mention they catch exect criminal on right time but the she was realse of previous good work of her life, Then She again committed crime. Due to which this riation nestiated to ances the past information of. criminal.
There are also some reason why lawyer think they should change it. First of all some people are not victim. but situation make them. They are not intension not about crime, but this type of Case jury should assess the past days of their life. For instance, when a person co- mmitte a crime with out motive imean accidently in this type of reason if Judge more thin decision denot think about rest of their life what they do they will be false.
In conclusion, Despite there are number of drawbeck in the state- ment but still believe a jury should make the judgment. rather than useing past data.