In recent years, study focus at the universities has become a subject of heated debate. While some argue that theoretical knowledge is crucial for comprehensive development, others operate that hands-on experience is extremely practical requested for employability, I am strongly convinced that more practical approach would noticeably improve the existing education system.
On the one hand, there are several arguments that speak in favour of the classic theory-focused higher education format, because it contributes to evolvment of the critical thinking. Not only does the stable foundation of knowledge helps to be a better expert, but it also allows students to adapt to the rapidly changing world. For instance, nowadays when AI has become a widely used tool and is already replacing some tasks, a quick adaptation gives experts an opportunity to secure their job positions and learn alongside technological progress.
On the other hand, opponents of the universities’ devotion to theory are inclined to think that real-world skills are necessary within the education system. Firstly, practical experience would help students to step into their careers without needing to learn additional information outside of the curriculum. Employability would grow significantly and reduce stress for both students and companies, as they are not forced to teach graduates. Secondly, it is real-world problem-solving skills that are acquired by implementing practical subjects into study schedule, as it means constant facing of existing problems. For example, a few university-found internships would put students under real conditions of labour market.
In conclusion, although exsessive studying of theory has certain advantages. I believe that hands-on experience would bring more noticeable results by preparing students for what actually awaits them after graduation, rather then focusing solely on theory. Therefore, it seems that some serious reforms are needed in modern universities, in order to ensure usefulness for students.
