There are contrasting views on urban living, and some argue that constructing tall apartment buildings could help accommodate more people. However, I believe that building more skyscrapers for the community is not a wise idea because it is costly.
It is undeniable that building some houses in dynamic cities could bring minor benefits, as it provides shelter for the homeless and for those who migrate from rural to urban areas. In many countries, when people move to the city, they lack land to build homes, so they often need to rent apartments. For instance, in major cities like Beijing, Bangkok, and Tokyo, local residents are not permitted to build their own homes; instead, governments construct numerous high-rise buildings for citizens to rent. This is because such cities have limited space and high demand for housing.
However, providing sufficient housing for city dwellers does not necessarily require building tall structures; rather, a more effective approach would be urban expansion. This means that overcrowded cities should be extended by relocating residents to new areas, such as the outskirts. This development would not only offer local residents adequate housing but also reduce congestion in the city center. This is because spreading the population over a larger area eases pressure on infrastructure and services.
In conclusion, despite the idea that erecting high-rise apartments in big cities could provide adequate housing, the better practice is to expand the city’s boundaries, as this offers more space for the local community and prevents overpopulation. While building tall buildings may help somewhat with housing, it is not the optimal solution; relocating and extending the city would be a more effective and sustainable idea.