The utilization of technological advancements to anonymously follow the activities of individuals is becoming more common in recent years. While it is true that there may be certain concerns that arise with this practice, I would argue that its overall benefits exceed its adverse consequences.
Perhaps the most significant advantage of leveraging innovation in surveillance is in the realm of criminology. Such tecniques enable law enforcement organizations to effectively capture perpetrators before or shortly after a crime is committed, shielding citizens from harm’s way. An excellent example of this is the swift arrest of the Shanghai Strangler, a Chinese serial killer, only a few hours after he murdered two prostitutes in a hotel room. The police department skillfully exploited the abundance of security cameras situated all over Shanghai to achieve this.
There exist a number of bodies that are vehemently opposed to similar unconventional usages of digital tools, however. According to them, placing security cameras throughout a town or recording the movement of people through their electronic devices is nothing short of fascism, as the state acquires absolute power to strip people of their privacy. In spite of the fact that these novel methods may, in a few cases, infringe on personal liberties, it is undoubtable that a host of tactics are available to guarantee that sensitive îmages and information are automatically stricken from records by Artificial Intelligence. For instance, an intelligent camera can instantly blur the image of the body of a suspect when undressing.
On the whole, I am of the belief that the security of nations is incontestably far more critical than the rights of individuals. In addition, numerous approaches are capable of ensuring that no right is invaded by governmental bodies that conduct these essential means of maintining safe cities globally. Therefore, in my view, these measures on parts of governments are completely justified.