In these days, in criminal area, there are some possible methods of exploring crime consequences. Some individuals think that human judgement is less reliable than science field in revealing offenders. In my opinion, scientific evidence is the most accurate type of crime-stopping method.
First of all, a scientific approach promotes correct information, based on deep biological analysis data. The observation of DNA allows for deriving personal identity and facilitates the disclosure of offenses. For example, the results of observing blood traces left at the scene might contribute to finding out potential suspects. Thus, modern scientific technology could provide precise data to help uncover crime incidents.
However, there are many who take the opposite view and claim that science cannot find out the motives or take testimonies. Despite DNA being a 100 percent accurate form of explanation, there is no replacement for the common sense that humans may provide. Yet, I reckon that humans might make errors in their thoughts and false assumptions, which could mislead the revealing of criminal cases.
To conclude, the scientific way of disclosing crime incidents is an exact technique because it contributes to deriving information about possible perpetrators, while human judgement suggests subjective evidence and can obscure the motives of criminals.