In these days, in criminal area there are some possible methods of exploring crimes consequences. Some individuals think that human judgement is less reliable than science field in revealing offenders. In my opinion, scientific evidences is the most accurately type of stopping crimes.
First of all, scientific approach promote correct information, basing on deep biological analysis data. The observation of DNA allows deriving personal identity and facilitate discolouring of offence. For example, the result of observation blood traces, that were left at the scene, might contribute finding out potential suspects. Thus, modern scientific technology could provide precise data to help uncover crime accidents.
However, there are many who take the opposite view, and claim that science cannot find out the motives or take testimonies. Despite that DNA is 100 percent accurate form explanation, there is no replacement to common sense which may give people. Yet, I reckon that humans might be able making errors on their thoughts and false assumptions, which could mislead revealing criminal cases.
To conclude, scientific way at disclosing crime incidents is exactly technique because it contributes deriving information about possible perpetrators, while human judgement suggests subjective evidence and can deter motives of criminals.
