24 Hours Only: Get 39% OFF on Our Premium Plan - Check Out Now!
Bar Chart

Band 4+: The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.

Image for topic: The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image depicts a bar chart comparing waste disposal methods in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. The chart's vertical axis represents the percentage of total waste, while the horizontal axis lists the cities. Each city has four colored bars, corresponding to landfill (orange), incineration (blue), recycling (red), and composting (green), showing their respective percentages. Toronto: landfill 20%, incineration 30%, recycling 20%, composting 70%. Madrid: landfill 40%, incineration 10%, recycling 30%, composting 50%. Kuala Lumpur: landfill 70%, incineration 5%, recycling 20%, composting 10%. Amman: landfill 60%, incineration 0%, recycling 40%, composting 10%.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The bar chart gives information on waste manegment techniques in different cities, namely Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.

Overall, it can be seen from this graph is that The percentage of using recycling and compositing methods of every city is the least rate, while using incineration method is common in all areas, apart from Toronto. Incineration rate ranked second position after landfill technique in Amman and Toronto.

Firstly, if we look at the percentage points of using garbage disposal methods in Toronto, landliff stands at approximately 75 %, which is not only higher than the others, but it is also substantially more significant. The figure of incineration accounts for just above 10 %, while other methods, including recycling and compositing rate represents less than 10 %, with former at 7 % and latter at 6 %. Regarding ways of getting rid of waste in Madrid, the most common option is incineration, which accounts for 40 %, almost twice as much as the utilizing of recycling, at 22 % and starts third position. The landliff method is the most next common with 30 %, while the rate of compositing is at just below 9 %.

Secondly, those figures in Kuala Lumpur, incineration is this one whose percentage makes up a considerable higher with 55 % in all other categories, its percent is third times as high as landliff, at 18 %. Recycling is at 23 %, whereas compositing accounts for merely 6 %. With respect to trash handling systems in Amman, the most amount of trash is wasted with landliff technique with just around half of total waste disposal, which is 12 % higher than that of incineration, making up 47 %. The extent of using recycling and composting comprise the least rates, 11% and 3 % respectively.

Word Count: 298

Answers On The Same Topic:

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.

The bar chart shows how four cities (Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman) deal with their trash. There are four methods: landfill, incineration, recycling, and composting. In general, most cities use landfill and incineration the most. Recycling and composting are not very popular in any of these cities. First, landfill is the most popular method […]

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.

The given chart illustrates percentage of waste disposal methods used by four cities such as Landfil, Incineration, Recycling and Compositin. Toronto has done mover then 70% of its waste disposal through landinfill method on the other hand, very small amount of other methods have been used with little variations nearly under 10% Incomparision, Amman use […]

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.

The bar chart illustrates various methods (Landfill, Incineration, Recycling, and Compositing) of waste disposal in four different cities – Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. Overall, the Landfill was the most used method in Toronto and Amman, while Madrid and Kuala Lumpur applied the Incineration method of waste disposal more than others. Notably, the Compositing […]

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.

The bar chart given above illustrates the various ways of waste utilization in Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. In the bar were included four different ways of waste disposal, which are landfill, incineration, recycling and compositing. Overall, it could be seen that in all of the cities most popular method of utilization is landill […]

See All

Other Topics:

The bar chart below shows the annual coffee consumption per person, measured in liters, across six different countries in 2020. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The bar chart compares the annual coffee consumption rate per person of six different countries in 2020. Overall, the data reveals a vast disparity in coffee-drinking habits of populations in Europe and Asia. Luxembourgers stood as the most prolific drinkers, whereas Singaporeans exhibited comparatively modest demands for caffeine. In the European region, Luxembourg led the […]

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The chart below shows the main causes of animal extinction based on a recent environmental study. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. You should: Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features Make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words

The graph shows some factors that cause the extinction of animals, it illustrated the reasons that creatated this phenomenon as a percentages values, and devided these elements to five types. The highest reason that lead to the extinction of animals is because they loss their habitat which this factors recorded 40 percent, and is very […]

Here is a bar chart showing the percentage of people using different modes of transportation in five major cities. Your Task: 1. Analyze the chart. 2. Write an overview (summarizing the main trends). 3. Describe key details and comparisons. Write your response, and I'll provide feedback!

The bar chart illustrates the percentage of population using different modes of transportation in 5 various countries. Overall,the proportion of people using train in Tokyo showcase the highest rate between other remaining countries. Notably,the rate of car users in Sydney experience largest proportion,while the reverse was true for Tokyo. Focusing on figures which account for […]

The bar chart below gives information about average annual seafood consumption in Asian countries between 2002 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar chart illustrates the average yearly marine product consumption in Asian nations from 2002 to 2010. Overall, the quantity of marine products in Japan was ranked first in 2002, whereas Vietnam was the lowest seafood consumer in the same period. Moreover, most countries witnessed an upward trend in seafood intake per capita with […]

The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of frut and vegetables per day in the uk from 2001 to 2008.

The graph illustrates the rates in percentage of people who ate fruits and vegetables in the UK from 2001 to 2008. Overall, women depict the highest percentage compared to men and children during the age range. The highest figure is recorded in 2006, whereas the lowest in 2001. The chart increases steadily, reaching the highest […]

The graph shows the percentages of people going to cinemas in a European country on different days.

The bar chart illustrates information that percentages of people going to movies in five different days of week in Europe between 2003 and 2007. Overall,it is clear that in all years weekend days most people prefer to go cinemas rether than other days of week and Saturday hold the top spot during all years. The […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible and free for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
1000+ IELTS Tests & Samples
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & Content
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
279,000₫ 157,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 5,233₫/ngày)
819,000₫ 397,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 4,411₫/ngày)
1,649,000₫ 667,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 3,706₫/ngày)
3,299,000₫ 857,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 2,381₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.