🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Bar Chart

Band 4+: The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.

Image for topic: The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image depicts a bar chart comparing waste disposal methods in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. The chart's vertical axis represents the percentage of total waste, while the horizontal axis lists the cities. Each city has four colored bars, corresponding to landfill (orange), incineration (blue), recycling (red), and composting (green), showing their respective percentages. Toronto: landfill 20%, incineration 30%, recycling 20%, composting 70%. Madrid: landfill 40%, incineration 10%, recycling 30%, composting 50%. Kuala Lumpur: landfill 70%, incineration 5%, recycling 20%, composting 10%. Amman: landfill 60%, incineration 0%, recycling 40%, composting 10%.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The bar chart gives information on waste manegment techniques in different cities, namely Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.

Overall, it can be seen from this graph is that The percentage of using recycling and compositing methods of every city is the least rate, while using incineration method is common in all areas, apart from Toronto. Incineration rate ranked second position after landfill technique in Amman and Toronto.

Firstly, if we look at the percentage points of using garbage disposal methods in Toronto, landliff stands at approximately 75 %, which is not only higher than the others, but it is also substantially more significant. The figure of incineration accounts for just above 10 %, while other methods, including recycling and compositing rate represents less than 10 %, with former at 7 % and latter at 6 %. Regarding ways of getting rid of waste in Madrid, the most common option is incineration, which accounts for 40 %, almost twice as much as the utilizing of recycling, at 22 % and starts third position. The landliff method is the most next common with 30 %, while the rate of compositing is at just below 9 %.

Secondly, those figures in Kuala Lumpur, incineration is this one whose percentage makes up a considerable higher with 55 % in all other categories, its percent is third times as high as landliff, at 18 %. Recycling is at 23 %, whereas compositing accounts for merely 6 %. With respect to trash handling systems in Amman, the most amount of trash is wasted with landliff technique with just around half of total waste disposal, which is 12 % higher than that of incineration, making up 47 %. The extent of using recycling and composting comprise the least rates, 11% and 3 % respectively.

Word Count: 298

Answers On The Same Topic:

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.

The bar chart illustrates the percentages of total trash removal utilize in four different methods in four cities (Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman). Overall, in Toronto, the percentage of landfill increases significantly, while in Kuala Lumpur the incineration show the highest level compared with other cities. However, the recycling method in Madrid and Kuala […]

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.

The bar chart shows how four cities (Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman) deal with their trash. There are four methods: landfill, incineration, recycling, and composting. In general, most cities use landfill and incineration the most. Recycling and composting are not very popular in any of these cities. First, landfill is the most popular method […]

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.

The given chart illustrates percentage of waste disposal methods used by four cities such as Landfil, Incineration, Recycling and Compositin. Toronto has done mover then 70% of its waste disposal through landinfill method on the other hand, very small amount of other methods have been used with little variations nearly under 10% Incomparision, Amman use […]

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.

The bar chart illustrates various methods (Landfill, Incineration, Recycling, and Compositing) of waste disposal in four different cities – Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. Overall, the Landfill was the most used method in Toronto and Amman, while Madrid and Kuala Lumpur applied the Incineration method of waste disposal more than others. Notably, the Compositing […]

See All

Other Topics:

The bar chart below shows the production of the world’s oil in OPEC and non-OPEC countries. Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

The bar chart presents data regarding global oil production, specifically highlighting contributions from OPEC and non-OPEC countries between 1980 and 2020. The chart contrasts three distinct categories: non-OPEC nations, other OPEC countries, and OPEC nations from the Middle East. A prominent observation from the data is the substantial growth of oil production in non-OPEC countries, […]

The graph below contrasts the global automobile sales from 2007 to 2008 in different quarters. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

A glance at the chart provided reveals the contrast of global car sale in a year period between 2007 and 2008 in different quarters. Overall, there are four different nations. Namely: United States, Western Europe, Japan, and China. The trend of the China clearly shows they dominated approximately in every quarters, except the third one. […]

The graph below shows the number of applicants from four different countries in a UK university between 1999 and 2003. Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given bar graph compares the number of students from four different nations that applied in a UK university from 1999 to 2003. Overall, the number of international applicants increased gradually over the time while European Nations being an exemption which consistently declined. European students who had topped the chart in 1999 with 30,000 applicants […]

Michelin stars is a rating system used to grade restaurants on their quality by red Michelin guide every year. The graph represents the countries by number of 3 Michelin star restaurants in November 2017. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph depicts the number of countries by rating Michelin 3-star restaurants in November 2017. Overall, there are 11 countries which include Monaco in France and then Hong Kong and Macau clubbed in China.The data is in the form of highest to lowest. Highest was occupied by Japan whereas Belgium and South Korea gets 2 […]

The chart below give the information about the percentage of the adults population who were overweight in four different countries in 1980,1990,2000

The bar chart compares the percentage of the adult population who were overweight in Japan, Finland, Australia and USA from 1980 to 2000. Overall, the percentages in all countries increased steadily through the period, but the growth in the USA was more considerable. The highest percentage of overweight adults in 1980 was recorded in the […]

The chart below give the information about the percentage of the adults population who were overweight in four different countries in 1980,1990,2000

The chart illustrates the percentages of overweight adult people in Japan, Finland, Australia, and the US from 1 980 to 2000. Overall,the percentage of overweight adults increased in four different countries over the period, but the growth in the US was more considerable increased. In 1980 , the USA had the highest percentage (around 15%) […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.