The bar chart gives information on waste manegment techniques in different cities, namely Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.
Overall, it can be seen from this graph is that The percentage of using recycling and compositing methods of every city is the least rate, while using incineration method is common in all areas, apart from Toronto. Incineration rate ranked second position after landfill technique in Amman and Toronto.
Firstly, if we look at the percentage points of using garbage disposal methods in Toronto, landliff stands at approximately 75 %, which is not only higher than the others, but it is also substantially more significant. The figure of incineration accounts for just above 10 %, while other methods, including recycling and compositing rate represents less than 10 %, with former at 7 % and latter at 6 %. Regarding ways of getting rid of waste in Madrid, the most common option is incineration, which accounts for 40 %, almost twice as much as the utilizing of recycling, at 22 % and starts third position. The landliff method is the most next common with 30 %, while the rate of compositing is at just below 9 %.
Secondly, those figures in Kuala Lumpur, incineration is this one whose percentage makes up a considerable higher with 55 % in all other categories, its percent is third times as high as landliff, at 18 %. Recycling is at 23 %, whereas compositing accounts for merely 6 %. With respect to trash handling systems in Amman, the most amount of trash is wasted with landliff technique with just around half of total waste disposal, which is 12 % higher than that of incineration, making up 47 %. The extent of using recycling and composting comprise the least rates, 11% and 3 % respectively.
