Some people argue that such health care systems are responsible for giving a good level of medical services to all the people in the country, not related to the bank balance of the person. While I understand the reason behind the viewpoint, I disagree with the argument as this phenomenon leads to potential drawbacks in the long run.
On the one hand, if people are provided top-quality services by not seeing the bank balance of their accounts. Then it can help to erase the line between rich and poor people. Everybody will be treated equally so there is no difference at all. Both rich and poor can feel stress-free, thereby, increasing the number of labour workforce and contributing to the country’s economy. In addition, as more citizens are being given quality services, it will be beneficial for public health, reducing the number of people dealing with poor health problems.
Despite the aforementioned arguments, I disagree with the point of view as I believe more people depend on top-quality services supplied by governments can create a burden for the national budget paying for other aspects such as infrastructure, technology,… Besides, as the social gap between the poor and rich may vary, it is not unlikely that the government cannot offer better healthcare facilities in public hospitals while the rich people get far better treatments and diagnosis from the private healthcare facilities, creating the imbalance in society.
In conclusion, I still believe that as residents of every country pay tax to the government and in return they should get this bare minimum basic necessity, but exceptionally vulnerable groups need to have full support.