It is widely believed that protecting all wild animals are crucial, while others believe that it is necessary to protect some but not all of them. From my perspective, I partly agree with the former and this essay will provide various reasons.
On the one hand, people should recognise that there are too much reasons why it is more practical to protect only certain species rather than all wild animals. First of all, the limitation of money and resources to protect animals are considered a huge problem these days. This means that government and environmental organizations do not have enough money to protect every species. Consequently, they can only focus on animals that are in greatest danger. This is exemplified by endangered animals such as tigers and pandas which often receive more funding because they are close to extinction. Moreover, some animals are dangerous and harmful such as wild animals. In other words, certain wild animal can attack humans or destroy crops, therefore protecting them fully may create problem for local communities. For instance, in some rural areas, wild elephants damage farmland and cause serious financial losses for farmers.
On the other hand, I would argue that all wild animals should be protected because every species plays an important role in nature. Initially, it is undeniable that all animals are part of the system. As a result, if one species disappears, it will affect other animals and disturb the natural balance. A good illustration of this is predators disappear, the number of smaller animals may increase and harm crops and plants. Furthermore, humans are responsible for the decline of wildlife. Many animals are losing their habitats because of deforestation, pollution and urban development, hence, humans have a responsibility to protect them.
In conclusion, protecting all wild animals are important because all animals are part of the system and humans are responsible for the decline of wildlife.