Building The Skyline: The Birth And Growth Of Manhattan’s Skyscrapers - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From Cambridge IELTS 17 Academic Reading Test 3 · Part 3 · Questions 27–40
Reading Passage
Building the Skyline: The Birth and Growth of Manhattan’s Skyscrapers
Katharine L. Shester reviews a book by Jason Barr about the development of New York City
In Building the Skyline, Jason Barr takes the reader through a detailed history of New York City. The book combines geology, history, economics, and a lot of data to explain why business clusters developed where they did and how the early decisions of workers and firms shaped the skyline we see today. Building the Skyline is organized into two distinct parts. The first is primarily historical and addresses New York’s settlement and growth from 1609 to 1900; the second deals primarily with the 20th century and is a compilation of chapters commenting on different aspects of New York’s urban development. The tone and organization of the book changes somewhat between the first and second parts, as the latter chapters incorporate aspects of Barr’s related research papers.
Barr begins chapter one by taking the reader on a ‘helicopter time-machine’ ride - giving a fascinating account of how the New York landscape in 1609 might have looked from the sky. He then moves on to a subterranean walking tour of the city, indicating the location of rock and water below the subsoil, before taking the reader back to the surface. His love of the city comes through as he describes various fun facts about the location of the New York residence of early 19th-century vice-president Aaron Burr as well as a number of legends about the city.
Chapters two and three take the reader up to the Civil War (1861-1865), with chapter two focusing on the early development of land and the implementation of a grid system in 1811. Chapter three focuses on land use before the Civil War. Both chapters are informative and well researched and set the stage for the economic analysis that comes later in the book. I would have liked Barr to expand upon his claim that existing tenements* prevented skyscrapers in certain neighborhoods because ‘likely no skyscraper developer was interested in performing the necessary “slum clearance’”. Later in the book, Barr makes the claim that the depth of bedrock** was not a limiting factor for developers, as foundation costs were a small fraction of the cost of development. At first glance, it is not obvious why slum clearance would be limiting, while more expensive foundations would not.
Chapter four focuses on immigration and the location of neighborhoods and tenements in the late 19th century. Barr identifies four primary immigrant enclaves and analyzes their locations in terms of the amenities available in the area. Most of these enclaves were located on the least valuable land, between the industries located on the waterfront and the wealthy neighborhoods bordering Central Park.
Part two of the book begins with a discussion of the economics of skyscraper height. In chapter five, Barr distinguishes between engineering height, economic height, and developer height — where engineering height is the tallest building that can be safely made at a given time, economic height is the height that is most efficient from society’s point of view, and developer height is the actual height chosen by the developer, who is attempting to maximize return on investment.
Chapter five also has an interesting discussion of the technological advances that led to the construction of skyscrapers. For example, the introduction of iron and steel skeletal frames made thick, load-bearing walls unnecessary, expanding the usable square footage of buildings and increasing the use of windows and availability of natural light. Chapter six then presents data on building height throughout the 20th century and uses regression analysis to ‘predict’ building construction. While less technical than the research paper on which the chapter is based, it is probably more technical than would be preferred by a general audience.
Chapter seven tackles the ‘bedrock myth’, the assumption that the absence of bedrock close to the surface between Downtown and Midtown New York is the reason for skyscrapers not being built between the two urban centers. Rather, Barr argues that while deeper bedrock does increase foundation costs, these costs were neither prohibitively high nor were they large compared to the overall cost of building a skyscraper. What I enjoyed the most about this chapter was Barr’s discussion of how foundations are actually built. He describes the use of caissons, which enable workers to dig down for considerable distances, often below the water table, until they reach bedrock. Barr’s thorough technological history discusses not only how caissons work, but also the dangers involved. While this chapter references empirical research papers, it is a relatively easy read.
Chapters eight and nine focus on the birth of Midtown and the building boom of the 1920s. Chapter eight contains lengthy discussions of urban economic theory that may serve as a distraction to readers primarily interested in New York. However, they would be well-suited for undergraduates learning about the economics of cities. In the next chapter, Barr considers two of the primary explanations for the building boom of the 1920s — the first being exuberance, and the second being financing. He uses data to assess the viability of these two explanations and finds that supply and demand factors explain much of the development of the 1920s; though it enabled the boom, cheap credit was not, he argues, the primary cause.
In the final chapter (chapter 10), Barr discusses another of his empirical papers that estimates Manhattan land values from the mid-19th century to the present day. The data work that went into these estimations is particularly impressive. Toward the end of the chapter, Barr assesses ‘whether skyscrapers are a cause or an effect of high land values’. He finds that changes in land values predict future building height, but the reverse is not true. The book ends with an epilogue, in which Barr discusses the impact of climate change on the city and makes policy suggestions for New York going forward.
*a tenement: a multi-occupancy building of any sort, but particularly a run-down apartment building or slum building
**bedrock: the solid, hard rock in the ground that lies under a loose layer of soil
Questions
Questions 27–31 Multiple Choice (One Answer)
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
Write the correct letter in boxes on your answer sheet.
Questions 32–35 Yes / No / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in the Reading Passage?
In boxes on your answer sheet, write
YES if the statement agrees with the claims of the writer
NO if the statement contradicts the claims of the writer
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
Questions 36–40 Summary Completion
Complete the summary using the list of phrases, A-J, below.
Write the correct letter, A-J, in boxes on your answer sheet.
A development plans B deep excavations
C great distance D excessive expense
E impossible tasks F associated risks
G water level H specific areas
I total expenditure J construction guidelines
The bedrock myth
In chapter seven, Barr indicates how the lack of bedrock close to the surface does not explain why skyscrapers are absent from 36. He points out that although the cost of foundations increases when bedrock is deep below the surface, this cannot be regarded as 37, especially when compared to 38.
A particularly enjoyable part of the chapter was Barr’s account of how foundations are built. He describes not only how 39 are made possible by the use of caissons, but he also discusses their 40. The chapter is well researched but relatively easy to understand.
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q27 | D | The first is primarily historical and addresses New York’s settlement and growth from 1609 to 1900; the second deals primarily with the 20th century and is a compilation of chapters commenting on different aspects of New York’s urban development. | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about two parts of the book - one focusing on the history of New York from 1609 to 1900 and the other on the urban development in the 20th century through various chapters. Answer Explanation: The answer states that Barr's book covers a range of factors that affected the development of New York, which matches the information provided in the passage. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'D' because the excerpt mentions that the book covers different aspects of New York's urban development, aligning with the statement in answer choice D. |
| Q28 | B | At first glance, it is not obvious why slum clearance would be limiting, while more expensive foundations would not. | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about how it may not be clear why getting rid of slums would be a problem but spending more money on building foundations would not be an issue. Answer Explanation: The answer explains that Shester points out a potential issue with Barr's analysis of the information in the book about tenements. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'B' because it aligns with the idea that there might be a problem with the analysis presented, which is evident from Shester's apparent questioning of the logic behind the different approaches to urban development discussed in the passage. |
| Q29 | C | While less technical than the research paper on which the chapter is based, it is probably more technical than would be preferred by a general audience. | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage is saying that the chapter is not as difficult to understand as the original research paper it is based on, but it might still be too technical for most people. Answer Explanation: The answer C means that the chapter is too specialised for most readers, which matches the idea that it might be too technical for a general audience. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because the passage implies that the chapter is somewhat technical and not easily understandable by the general public, making it too specialised for most readers. |
| Q30 | D | Chapter eight contains lengthy discussions of urban economic theory that may serve as a distraction to readers primarily interested in New York. | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage mentions that the discussion of urban economic theory in Chapter eight might not be interesting to readers who are mainly focused on New York. Answer Explanation: The answer suggests that some parts of the chapters about the 1920s building boom might only appeal to specific people. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'Some parts will have limited appeal to certain people' (D) because it aligns with the information in the excerpt where it indicates that the lengthy discussions in Chapter eight could distract readers primarily interested in New York, implying limited appeal to those readers. |
| Q31 | C | In the final chapter (chapter 10), Barr discusses another of his empirical papers that estimates Manhattan land values from the mid-19th century to the present day. The data work that went into these estimations is particularly impressive. | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about Barr discussing a paper about estimating land values in Manhattan from the mid-19th century until now. It mentions that the work done to estimate these values is very impressive. Answer Explanation: The answer choice 'C' refers to the nature of the research into the topic, which means Barr's work on estimating Manhattan land values from the mid-19th century to the present day. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'C' because the passage highlights the impressive data work that Barr did to estimate Manhattan land values over a broad time period, making it clear that the nature of the research into the topic is what impresses Shester the most. |
| Q32 | NO | Barr begins chapter one by taking the reader on a ‘helicopter time-machine’ ride – giving a fascinating account of how the New York landscape in 1609 might have looked from the sky. | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about how the author describes what New York might have looked like in the early 1600s from the sky. Answer Explanation: The answer indicates that the statement saying the description lacked interest is incorrect. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'NO' because the passage states that the author provided a fascinating account of how New York might have appeared from the sky in the early 1600s. This shows that the writer's description was indeed interesting, thereby contradicting the statement in the question. |
| Q33 | YES | Both chapters are informative and well researched and set the stage for the economic analysis that comes later in the book. | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that both chapters are informative and well researched, and they set the stage for the economic analysis that will be discussed later in the book. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the statements in chapters two and three help the reader understand the upcoming material. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the passage explicitly states that chapters two and three prepare the reader well for the economic analysis that follows, indicating agreement with the claim that these chapters set the stage for the material to come. |
| Q34 | NOT GIVEN | Chapter four focuses on immigration and the location of neighborhoods and tenements in the late 19th century. Barr identifies four primary immigrant enclaves and analyzes their locations in terms of the amenities available in the area. | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about immigrant neighborhoods in the late 19th century and how Barr analyzes their locations based on the amenities available. Answer Explanation: The answer means that it's impossible to determine from the passage whether the biggest problem for many nineteenth-century New York immigrant neighborhoods was a lack of amenities. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'NOT GIVEN' because the passage does not explicitly state whether a lack of amenities was the biggest problem for these neighborhoods. It only mentions that Barr analyzed their locations in terms of the amenities available, without specifying if it was the primary issue. |
| Q35 | NO | Most of these enclaves were located on the least valuable land, between the industries located on the waterfront and the wealthy neighborhoods bordering Central Park. | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about where immigrant neighborhoods were located in the nineteenth century. It mentions that these neighborhoods were situated on less valuable land between the waterfront industries and the wealthier areas near Central Park. Answer Explanation: The answer 'NO' means that the statement about immigrant neighborhoods concentrating around the harbor in the nineteenth century is incorrect based on the passage. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer 'NO' is supported by the passage because it explicitly states that immigrant enclaves were situated between the waterfront industries and the affluent neighborhoods bordering Central Park, not concentrated around the harbor. |
| Q36 | H | the assumption that the absence of bedrock close to the surface between Downtown and Midtown New York is the reason for skyscrapers not being built between the two urban centers. | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about how the belief that the lack of bedrock near the surface is the reason why skyscrapers are not built in a specific area between two urban centers. Answer Explanation: The answer is indicating that the author specifically points out certain areas as significant in discussing why skyscrapers are absent from those locations. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'H' because it corresponds to 'specific areas,' which aligns with the passage's mention of a particular area between Downtown and Midtown New York where the absence of bedrock is discussed in relation to building skyscrapers. |
| Q37 | D | Barr argues that while deeper bedrock does increase foundation costs, these costs were neither prohibitively high nor were they large | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about how the cost of building foundations increases when the bedrock is deep below the surface, but it is not excessively expensive or impossible. Answer Explanation: The answer 'D' signifies 'excessive expense'. It means that the cost of foundation work, even when the bedrock is deep, is not unreasonably high. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer 'D' aligns with the passage, which states that although foundation costs rise with deeper bedrock, they are not described as excessively expensive. |
| Q38 | I | compared to the overall cost of building a skyscraper | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about how the cost of building skyscrapers is not too high when compared to the total cost of building them. Answer Explanation: The answer indicates that the total expenditure of constructing skyscrapers is being discussed in the excerpt. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'I' because the excerpt mentions the comparison of foundation costs to the overall cost of building a skyscraper, emphasizing the concept of total expenditure in construction projects. |
| Q39 | B | He describes the use of caissons, which enable workers to dig down for considerable distances, often below the water table, until they reach bedrock. | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about how caissons, a type of foundation construction technique, allow workers to dig very deep underground to reach the bedrock. Answer Explanation: The answer implies that the construction process involves digging deep excavations, which aligns with the concept of using caissons to reach the bedrock. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer 'B' (deep excavations) matches the idea of workers digging deep below the surface using caissons to reach the bedrock, as described in the excerpt. This aligns with the explanation provided in the passage. |
| Q40 | F | Barr’s thorough technological history discusses not only how caissons work, but also the dangers involved. | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about how Barr discusses the functioning of caissons in building foundations for structures like skyscrapers, highlighting the risks involved in this construction process. Answer Explanation: The answer indicates that the excerpt discusses the risks associated with the construction of foundations, specifically mentioning the dangers involved in the process. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'F' because it aligns with the content of the excerpt, which emphasizes the risks (associated risks) related to building foundations, particularly highlighted in Barr's discussion about caissons in the chapter. |
