Buildings are highly regarded for their exterior appearances. It has been argued that the intended use should be the preference when designing architects over its aesthetics. From my perspective, I agree and think that the outward appearance should not compromise its building architecture.
When designing a building, the purpose of the building should be the top priority for architects. For instance, when designing a hospital, the easiest route for a patient to get to the emergency room should be considered, and there should be enough space in the lobby to get to the outpatient ward. If the specific rooms for a hospital are not designed correctly, they can create discomfort for patients, and in some cases, they can even lead to the death of a patient. Therefore, the purpose of a building should be a top priority for designers.
Furthermore, safety concerns might arise if the building model is altered for external presentation. Architects should carefully consider the fire safety department’s regulations while designing a building’s egress locations. A prime example is the recent fire incident that happened as a result of the builder’s carelessness in replacing fire exits with a fountain design in an attempt to improve the building’s appearance. In addition to costing the building owner money, this catastrophe ended up being the reason for several fatalities. As a result, the building’s goal should be the designers’ first concern, and government inspectors should visit the structure to ensure that it is secure for occupants.
In conclusion, neglecting to design a structure with its intended use in mind rather than only its exterior may make its occupants uncomfortable and occasionally even raise safety issues.