So many things make a city tourist-friendly. Aside from the quality of infrastructure and tourism openness, travelers rate a city’s friendliness level by how helpful the locals are. It may include going out of their way to help a tourist who’s asking for directions, how easy it is to navigate the city, how hospitable and welcoming the locals are, the availability of signage in multiple languages or ensuring the security of visitors.Firstly, so many good sides to improve the city for people. It’s really benefit to make attractive city for tourists. But there many building which describe the history of city. There’re 2 groups of people , but i prefer to save historical buildings.One clear example is Cologne Cathedral , the most attractive and unique design.Secondly, the countries with great history have many attractive cities , in other words there is no reason to remake cities and make it looks good.
I said only about popular cities but there are many cities which need to be attractive or cities which were destroyed after war. In that case , reconstracting gonna be great idea.
In conclusion , this question is hard to answear because the answear depends on cities which need to be attractive and other cities unlike them.If we talk about Tashkent , i will disagree because i love my city and for our time Tashkent is attractive , also we have Buxoro and Samarkan , Xiva those cities need to be improved but tourists like old cities unlike local people.If we talk about underdeveloped cities , they should be improved.Overall i’m agree.