The controversy of environmental issues has questioned many people’s perspective about living on the earth. Indeed, some believe that we might have to mitigate other planets to survive. Think finding solutions to control the environment is a better choice than finding a planet that supports our livelihood can solve this issue because it is a expensive and untested method. Therefore I disagree with this opinion.
Environmental problems are man made which means we can control them. For instance, trees are necessary in order to survive on earth as they absorb more carbon and provide purified air. However, in order to build the cities, we created issues like deforestation by cutting down trees and forests. Resulting in more polluted air and raising many respiratory diseases. Thus, we should try to find better and sustainable solutions in order to save the earth as responsible citizens.
Mitigating to another planet seems like a bizarre and expensive option. For instance, there is very little evidence of life on another planet because of different climate conditions. Because of limited research it would be unsafe trying to move more than billions of people to another planet, spending huge amounts of money on space rockets, fuel and other resources to travel, which
To conclude, environmental problems are rising because of man-made activities, to address them it is better to focus on finding solutions instead of trying to find ways to move to other planets.Therefore, I strongly disagree that it is not an accurate solution to immigrate to other planets with limited amount of studies and expensive methods.