Exotic Pests - IELTS Listening Answers & Explanations
From IELTS Trainer 1 Academic Listening Test 1 · Part 4 · Questions 31–40
Audio
Questions
Questions 31–40 Table Completion
Complete the table below.
Write NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS for each answer.
| EXOTIC PESTS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Origin | Name | New habitat | Notes |
| Australia | red-backed spider | New Zealand and Japan | even on island in middle of 31 |
| England | rabbit | Australia | 800 years ago: imported into England to be used for 32 |
| America | fire ants | 33 in Brisbane | imported by chance |
| Australia | 34 | Scotland | deliberately introduced in order to improve 35 (not effective) |
| New Zealand | flatworm | 36 Europe | accidental introduction inside imported 37 |
| Japan | 38 | Australian coastal waters | some advantages |
| Australia | budgerigar | urban areas of south-east 39 | smaller flocks because of arrival of 40 in recent years |
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q31 | the Atlantic Ocean / Atlantic Ocean / the Atlantic / Atlantic | well, it's also been found on Tristan da Cunha, which is a remote island, thousands of miles from anywhere, way out in the middle of the Atlantic | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript explains that the red-backed spider has reached a very far island named Tristan da Cunha, which is located in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. Answer Explanation: The answer identifies the Atlantic Ocean as the location for a very small and far-away island where the Australian red-backed spider was found. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is Atlantic because the lecturer describes the spider's spread to a very distant and lonely island called Tristan da Cunha. He specifically says this island is located out in the middle of the Atlantic. The term 'middle of' in the table directly matches the lecturer's description of where the ocean is. |
| Q32 | luxury food source / food source / luxury food / food | The fact that rabbits increased so rapidly is perhaps more understandable when we remind ourselves that they had originally been introduced to England from continental Europe eight centuries earlier. This was because they were regarded as a luxury food source, and in spite of having warm fur, they probably originated on the hot dry plains of Spain, which of course explains why they thrive in the climate of Australia | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript explains that 800 years ago (eight centuries), rabbits were taken to England because people thought of them as a special kind of food to eat. Answer Explanation: The answer means that rabbits were brought to England a long time ago (800 years) to be used as a special or expensive type of food. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is found in the part of the lecture where the speaker discusses the history of rabbits. The speaker explains that about 800 years ago (described as 'eight centuries earlier'), rabbits were first brought to England from another part of Europe. The reason for this was that they were seen as a 'luxury food source'. The table asks what they were 'used for', and since 'luxury' and 'source' are extra details, 'food' is the main answer. |
| Q33 | in gardens / gardens | Their huge nests can now be found in gardens in the city of Brisbane and they are costing the Australian government a great deal of money in control measures | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript says that these insects have built very large nests in the gardens of the city of Brisbane. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the fire ants live and build their homes in gardens within the city of Brisbane. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is based on the lecturer's description of where fire ants are living now in Australia. The fire ants, which are from America, are spreading very quickly. The lecturer specifically mentions that their 'nests' (their homes) are located in 'gardens' in the city of Brisbane. In the table, 'New habitat' refers to the place where these pests live in their new home. |
| Q34 | earthworm / earth worm | in 1975 an Australian species of earthworm was deliberately introduced to the northern hemisphere, in Scotland, because they were bigger than the natives | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript states that in the year 1975, a type of earthworm from Australia was intentionally brought to Scotland, which is in the northern part of the world. Answer Explanation: The answer is the name of a small, soft animal with a long body that lives in the ground and helps the dirt. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is earthworm because the lecturer talks about a specific animal from Australia that was brought to Scotland in 1975. The speaker uses the word 'introduced,' which matches the table's note about being 'deliberately introduced.' The animal's country of origin (Australia) and its new home (Scotland) also match the details in the table. |
| Q35 | soil condition / soil | The aim was that they would be more effective than native species, but in fact they don't do more for the soil condition than the smaller locals which they displace | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript explains that the goal of bringing in the new worms was to help the ground better than the local ones, but they did not actually improve the state of the dirt any more than the worms that were already there. Answer Explanation: The answer refers to the health or quality of the ground (dirt) that the Australian earthworms were meant to help improve. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is soil (condition) because the lecturer explains that a specific type of earthworm from Australia was brought to Scotland on purpose. People thought these bigger worms would be better at improving how the dirt works compared to the local worms. This matches the table's note about introducing the pest to improve something that was ultimately not effective. |
| Q36 | North-west / Northwest / north-west / northwest | This is a most unwelcome newcomer in these regions of north-west Europe | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript states that the flatworm is a new and unwanted animal in the northwestern part of Europe. Answer Explanation: The answer "North-west" tells us which part of the European continent the New Zealand flatworm has moved into. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is found by listening to the part where the lecturer talks about the New Zealand flatworm. They describe the worm as an "unwelcome newcomer" to specific "regions" or areas. The speaker exactly names "north-west Europe" as the place where these flatworms are now living. |
| Q37 | plant pots | It's now been realised that it was actually carried in the plant pots containing exotic ornamental shrubs and so on | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript explains that people discovered the flatworm moved to new places because it was hiding inside the containers that hold plants. Answer Explanation: The answer refers to the containers or vessels that hold soil and plants. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'plant pots' because the lecturer explains that the New Zealand flatworm was an 'accidental introduction' to Europe. It was not brought there on purpose; instead, it was 'carried in' or transported inside the containers (the pots) used for exotic shrubs and plants being shipped into the country. |
| Q38 | seaweeds / seaweed / sea weeds / sea weed | Next, there's a further instance, this time in the water and it's come from Japan. It's a delicious but very fast-spreading seaweed and is one of many exotic species, large and small, in the seas covering the rocks around Australia | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript says that a plant called seaweed came from Japan and is now growing very quickly in the water near Australia. Answer Explanation: The answer is seaweed, which is a plant that grows in the ocean. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is seaweed because the speaker talks about a pest from Japan that lives in the ocean. They describe it as a 'fast-spreading seaweed' that is now found in the waters around Australia. The table notes mention 'some advantages' because people catch it and sell it as food back to its original home. |
| Q39 | United States / USA | So, these flocks of budgerigars have been getting very numerous in the south-east of the United States, particularly in residential areas | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript explains that many of these birds are now living in the southeast part of the United States, mostly in neighborhoods where people live. Answer Explanation: The answer is the name of the country where wild groups of budgerigars (small parrots) now live in certain city areas. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is correct because the lecturer describes the budgerigar as an Australian bird that has become an invader in a specific part of the world. The teacher mentions that these birds live in large groups in the southeast of the United States, especially in places where people have their houses (residential areas). |
| Q40 | new competitors / competitors | it has been observed that the size of the flocks has diminished somewhat recently. The fact that they are smaller is thought to be due to the fact that new competitors for their habitat have arrived from other places | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript explains that the number of birds in a group is getting smaller recently. This is happening because new rival animals have come to live in the same area. Answer Explanation: The answer means other animals that want to live in the same place and eat the same food. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is derived from the lecturer's explanation about why groups (flocks) of budgerigars in America are getting smaller. The speaker mentions that the number of these birds has 'diminished' (become less) because 'new competitors'—other animals looking for the same living space—have moved into the area. |
Transcript
You will hear part of a lecture about exotic pests given as the introduction to a course on ecology and environment. First you have some time to look at questions 31 to 40.
[Pause the recording for one minute.]
Now listen carefully and answer questions 31 to 40.
Lecturer: Good afternoon. I want this afternoon as an introduction to our ecology module to offer examples of exotic pests - non-native animals or plants which are, or may be, causing problems - which might prove a fruitful topic for seminar papers later in the term. People and products are criss-crossing the world as never before, and on these new global highways, plants and animals are travelling too.
Exotic plants and animals are turning up in Antarctica and on the most remote islands on Earth. For example, the Australian red-backed spider - it's made its way to countries fairly near home, such as New Zealand and Japan, as some of you may know - well, it's also been found on Tristan da Cunha, which is a remote island, thousands of miles from anywhere, way out in the middle of the Atlantic.
Now, another famous animal invader in the other direction, so to speak, from England to Australia in the southern hemisphere, is the rabbit. This was in 1830 and it might seem less of a threat, but it became an extraordinarily destructive pest. The fact that rabbits increased so rapidly is perhaps more understandable when we remind ourselves that they had originally been introduced to England from continental Europe eight centuries earlier. This was because they were regarded as a luxury food source, and in spite of having warm fur, they probably originated on the hot dry plains of Spain, which of course explains why they thrive in the climate of Australia.
A much less cuddly example of a pest introduced to Australia, this time from America, is fire ants. These are increasing and spreading very fast. Their huge nests can now be found in gardens in the city of Brisbane and they are costing the Australian government a great deal of money in control measures. These were an accidental introduction, rather than a deliberate one, brought to Australia, probably in horticultural imports or in mud on second-hand machinery.
As a biologist and conservationist, I have become increasingly concerned about these matters. Exotic invasions are irreversible and deserve to be taken more seriously even when they aren't particularly damaging. For example, something that is not necessarily a major disaster compared to other ecological experiments: in 1975 an Australian species of earthworm was deliberately introduced to the northern hemisphere, in Scotland, because they were bigger than the natives. The aim was that they would be more effective than native species, but in fact they don't do more for the soil condition than the smaller locals which they displace. Although they don't do a lot of harm, as far as we know up to now, this will probably prove to have been a mistake.
A much more serious case, also in Scotland, as well as other countries, along with the latest victim, Iceland, is the New Zealand flatworm. This is a most unwelcome newcomer in these regions of north-west Europe. Basically, this flatworm came into these countries by accident. It's now been realised that it was actually carried in the plant pots containing exotic ornamental shrubs and so on, and as it eats local earthworms, and doesn't benefit the local ecology in any way, it is a real pest.
Next, there's a further instance, this time in the water and it's come from Japan. It's a delicious but very fast-spreading seaweed and is one of many exotic species, large and small, in the seas covering the rocks around Australia. Unfortunately, it is replacing indigenous seaweeds and permanently altering the ecosystem. However, to look at the situation from a business point of view - it is now being harvested and exported, dried, back to Japan, its original home, where it's particularly popular. So sometimes we may find accidental benefits from apparently harmful arrivals.
Well, you could say that world ecology is now going the same way as popular culture. Global music and fashions, food and drinks are taking over from local ones in every land. And in ecosystems, we find vigorous exotic invaders overwhelming native species and natural habitats.
But can we find any examples of invaders which appear to be a problem and then find that in fact they may not be such a big issue after all? We might take as an example a native of Australia, the budgerigar, the most common pet parrot in the world, of course. Because there have been many escapes over the years, it is now to be found flying about in feral flocks where the climate suits it. So, these flocks of budgerigars have been getting very numerous in the south-east of the United States, particularly in residential areas. People have been getting quite worried about this, but it has been observed that the size of the flocks has diminished somewhat recently. The fact that they are smaller is thought to be due to the fact that new competitors for their habitat have arrived from other places.
That's the last example for now. What I'd like you to consider is this: Is the planet Earth moving towards a one-world ecosystem? How far would it be a wholly bad development?
That is the end of section 4. You now have half a minute to check your answers.
[Pause the recording for 30 seconds.]
