🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!

America’s Oldest Art? - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations

From IELTS Trainer 1 Academic Reading Test 5 · Part 3 · Questions 27–40

Reading Passage

You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 below.

America's oldest art?

Set within treacherously steep cliffs, and hidden away in the secluded valleys of northeast Brazil, is some of South America's most significant and spectacular rock-art. Most of the art so far discovered from the ongoing excavations comes from the archaeologically-important National Park of the Serra da Capivara in the state of Piaui, and it is causing quite a controversy. The reason for the uproar? The art is being dated to around 25,000 or perhaps, according to some archaeologists, even 36,000 years ago. If correct, this is set to challenge the widely held view that the Americas were first colonised from the north, via the Bering Straits from eastern Siberia at around 10,000 BC, only moving down into Central and South America in the millennia thereafter.

Prior to the designation of 130,000 hectares as a National Park, the rock-art sites were difficult to get to, and often dangerous to enter. In ancient times, this inaccessibility must have heightened the importance of the sites, and indeed of the people who painted on the rocks. Wild animals and human figures dominate the art, and are incorporated into often-complex scenes involving hunting, supernatural beings, fighting and dancing. The artists depicted the animals that roamed the local ancient brushwood forest. The large mammals are usually painted in groups and tend to be shown in a running stance, as though trying to escape from hunting parties. Processions - lines of human and animal figures - also appear of great importance to these ancient artists. Might such lines represent family units or groups of warriors? On a number of panels, rows of stylised figures, some numbering up to 30 individual figures, were painted using the natural undulating contours of the rock surface, so evoking the contours of the surrounding landscape. Other interesting, but very rare, occurrences are scenes that show small human figures holding on to and dancing around a tree, possibly involved in some form of a ritual dance.

Due to the favourable climatic conditions, the imagery on many panels is in a remarkable state of preservation. Despite this, however, there are serious conservation issues that affect their long-term survival. The chemical and mineral qualities of the rock on which the imagery is painted is fragile and on several panels it is unstable. As well as the secretion of sodium carbonate on the rock surface, complete panel sections have, over the ancient and recent past, broken away from the main rock surface. These have then become buried and sealed into sometimes-ancient floor deposits. Perversely, this form of natural erosion and subsequent deposition has assisted archaeologists in dating several major rock-art sites. Of course, dating the art is extremely difficult given the non-existence of plant and animal remains that might be scientifically dated. However, there are a small number of sites in the Serra da Capivara that are giving up their secrets through good systematic excavation. Thus, at Toca do Boqueirao da Pedra Furada, rock-art researcher Niéde Guidon managed to obtain a number of dates. At different levels of excavation, she located fallen painted rock fragments, which she was able to date to at least 36,000 years ago. Along with the painted fragments, crude stone tools were found. Also discovered were a series of scientifically datable sites of fireplaces, or hearths, the earliest dated to 46,000 BC, arguably the oldest dates for human habitation in the Americas.

However, these conclusions are not without controversy. Critics, mainly from North America, have suggested that the hearths may in fact be a natural phenomenon, the result of seasonal brushwood fires. Several North American researchers have gone further and suggested that the rock-art from this site dates from no earlier than about 3,730 years ago, based on the results of limited radiocarbon dating. Adding further fuel to the general debate is the fact that the artists in the area of the National Park tended not to draw over old motifs (as often occurs with rock-art), which makes it hard to work out the relative chronology of the images or styles. However, the diversity of imagery and the narrative the paintings create from each of the many sites within the National Park suggests different artists were probably making their art at different times, and potentially using each site over many thousands of years.

With fierce debates thus raging over the dating, where these artists originate from is also still very much open to speculation. The traditional view ignores all the early dating evidence from the South American rock-art sites. In a revised scenario, some palaeo-anthropologists are now suggesting that modern humans may have migrated from Africa using the strong currents of the Atlantic Ocean some 60,000 years or more ago, while others suggest a more improbable colonisation coming from the Pacific Ocean. Yet, while either hypothesis is plausible, there is still no supporting archaeological evidence between the South American coastline and the interior. Rather, it seems possible that there were a number of waves of human colonisation of the Americas occurring possibly over a 60,000-100,000 year period, probably using the Bering Straits as a land-bridge to cross into the Americas.

Despite the compelling evidence from South America, it stands alone: the earliest secure human evidence yet found in the state of Oregon in North America only dates to 12,300 years BC. So this is a fierce debate that is likely to go on for many more years. However, the splendid rock-art and its allied archaeology of northeast Brazil, described here, is playing a huge and significant role in the discussion.

Questions

Questions 27–29 Multiple Choice (One Answer)

Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.

27 According to the first paragraph, the rock-art in Serra da Capivara may revolutionise accepted ideas about
  1. the way primitive people lived in North America.
  2. the date when the earliest people arrived in South America.
  3. the origin of the people who crossed the Bering Straits.
  4. the variety of cultures which developed in South America.
28 How did the ancient artists use the form of the rock where they painted?
  1. to mimic the shape of the countryside nearby
  2. to emphasise the shape of different animals
  3. to give added light and shade to their paintings
  4. to give the impression of distance in complex works
29 In the fourth paragraph, what does the writer say is unusual about the rock-artists of Serra da Capivara?
  1. They had a very wide range of subject-matter.
  2. Their work often appears to be illustrating a story.
  3. They tended to use a variety of styles in one painting.
  4. They rarely made new paintings on top of old ones.

Questions 30–36 Yes / No / Not Given

Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 3?

Write

YES if the statement agrees with the claims of the writer

NO if the statement contradicts the claims of the writer

NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this

30 Archaeologists have completed their survey of the rock-art in Piaui.
31 The location of the rock-art suggests that the artists had a significant role in their society.
32 The paintings of animals show they were regarded as sacred by the ancient humans.
33 Some damage to paintings is most likely due to changes in the weather of the region.
34 The fact that some paintings were buried is useful to archaeologists.
35 The tools found near some paintings were probably used for hunting animals.
36 The North American researchers have confirmed Niéde Guidon's dating of the paintings.

Questions 37–40 Matching Sentence Endings

Complete each sentence with the correct ending, A-F, below.

A. are giving rise to a great deal of debate among palaeo-anthropologists.

B. do not support the earliest dates suggested for the arrival of people in America.

C. are absent from rock-art sites in the Serra da Capivara.

D. have not been accepted by academics outside America.

E. centre on whether or not they are actually man-made.

F. reflect the advances in scientific dating methods.

37 Materials derived from plants or animals
38 The discussions about the ancient hearths
39 Theories about where the first South Americans originated from
40 The finds of archaeologists in Oregon

Answers & Explanations Summary

# Answer Evidence Explanation
Q27 B The art is being dated to around 25,000 or perhaps, according to some archaeologists, even 36,000 years ago. If correct, this is set to challenge the widely held view that the Americas were first colonised from the north, via the Bering Straits from eastern Siberia at around 10,000 BC, only moving down into Central and South America in the millennia thereafter Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that the art is very old (25,000 to 36,000 years). This new timeline goes against the old idea that people only started living in the Americas around 10,000 BC. Therefore, the old beliefs about when people arrived are being questioned.
Answer Explanation:
The answer means that the art found in Serra da Capivara might change what scientists believe about the time when humans first reached South America.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is B because the text mentions that the rock-art is being dated to between 25,000 and 36,000 years ago. This discovery is described as something that could "challenge" (revolutionise or change) the "widely held view" (the accepted idea) that people first arrived in the Americas much later, around 10,000 BC. By showing that the art is much older, it suggests that people were already living in South America long before the currently accepted dates.
Q28 A On a number of panels, rows of stylised figures, some numbering up to 30 individual figures, were painted using the natural undulating contours of the rock surface, so evoking the contours of the surrounding landscape Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage states that the artists painted rows of people on the bumpy parts of the rock to show the shape of the hills and land in the area around them.
Answer Explanation:
The answer explains that the artists used the natural, wavy shapes of the rock walls to show the shapes of the land outside.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is A because the text describes how artists used the wavy shapes of the rock's surface to represent the hills and land nearby. The phrase 'undulating contours' refers to the wavy form of the rock, and 'evoking' means to create an image or feeling in the mind, similar to 'mimicking' or copying. The 'surrounding landscape' in the passage is another way of saying the 'countryside nearby.'
Q29 D the fact that the artists in the area of the National Park tended not to draw over old motifs (as often occurs with rock-art) Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that the people who created this art usually avoided painting new designs over older ones, even though painting over old work is a common thing found in most other ancient rock art.
Answer Explanation:
The answer says that the artists in this area almost never painted new pictures over the top of older pictures.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is D because the fourth paragraph mentions that these artists 'tended not to draw over old motifs'. While artists in other parts of the world often painted new images on top of old ones, the artists in Serra da Capivara did not. This choice of theirs is considered unusual and makes it difficult for researchers to figure out which paintings are older than others. The phrase 'not to draw over' is another way of saying they did not paint 'on top of' previous work.
Q30 NO Most of the art so far discovered from the ongoing excavations comes from the archaeologically-important National Park of the Serra da Capivara in the state of Piaui, and it is causing quite a controversy Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that the search for and study of the art in the state of Piaui is currently happening right now by calling them 'ongoing excavations.'
Answer Explanation:
The answer is NO because the statement says archaeologists have finished their work, but the passage says the work is still happening.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is NO because the text describes the excavations in the state of Piaui as 'ongoing.' This word means that the work is currently in progress and has not been finished or completed. Therefore, the claim that archaeologists have completed their survey directly contradicts the information provided in the passage.
Q31 YES In ancient times, this inaccessibility must have heightened the importance of the sites, and indeed of the people who painted on the rocks Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that in the past, the fact that these places were hard to get to probably made the locations and the artists who worked there more important to society.
Answer Explanation:
The answer is YES because the writer believes the difficult-to-reach locations of the art suggest that the artists were special or very important people in their community.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is YES because the text explains that the difficulty in reaching these sites likely increased the value or status of both the locations themselves and the individuals who created the artwork. The word 'inaccessibility' refers to the locations being hard to get to, and 'heightened the importance' means it made them more significant or special in their society.
Q32 NOT GIVEN The artists depicted the animals that roamed the local ancient brushwood forest. The large mammals are usually painted in groups and tend to be shown in a running stance, as though trying to escape from hunting parties Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that the artists drew common animals from the forest and showed them trying to get away from hunters, but it does not say the animals were special or holy.
Answer Explanation:
The answer means that the text does not provide enough information to know if the ancient people thought the animals were holy or religious.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is "NOT GIVEN" because while the text describes what the animal paintings look like, it never mentions the word "sacred" or suggests the animals were worshipped. The passage notes that the animals look like they are running away from hunters, which describes a survival or predatory relationship rather than a religious one. Phrases like "supernatural beings" and "ritual dance" appear in the text, but they are not used to describe how the humans felt about the animals.
Q33 NO Due to the favourable climatic conditions, the imagery on many panels is in a remarkable state of preservation. Despite this, however, there are serious conservation issues that affect their long-term survival. The chemical and mineral qualities of the rock on which the imagery is painted is fragile and on several panels it is unstable Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage states that the good weather helps the art survive. It makes it clear that the danger to the paintings comes from the weak and unstable nature of the rocks themselves, rather than any negative changes in the weather.
Answer Explanation:
The answer "NO" means that the sentence in the question is incorrect according to the text.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is NO because the author explains that the local weather (climatic conditions) is actually "favourable," which means it is good and helps keep the paintings in a "remarkable state of preservation" (keeps them looking good). The damage mentioned in the text is caused by the "chemical and mineral qualities" of the stone and the rock being "unstable" or "fragile," not by changes in the weather.
Q34 YES These have then become buried and sealed into sometimes-ancient floor deposits. Perversely, this form of natural erosion and subsequent deposition has assisted archaeologists in dating several major rock-art sites Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage says that painted sections of rock fell and were covered by many layers of earth. This process actually helped people who study history through objects (archaeologists) work out the age of the different art sites.
Answer Explanation:
The answer means that the writer thinks it is helpful for researchers when pieces of the old art are covered by the ground.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is YES because the text explains that parts of the rock paintings broke off and got buried and sealed in the floor. This event, which seems like a bad thing because the art broke, actually helped archaeologists find out the age of the art. The word 'assisted' in the text means 'helped,' and 'dating' refers to calculating how old something is.
Q35 NOT GIVEN Along with the painted fragments, crude stone tools were found Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage states that simple stone tools were discovered near the art, but it does not provide any details about how the ancient people used those tools.
Answer Explanation:
The answer is NOT GIVEN because the text does not say whether the tools found were used for hunting or for something else.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because while the passage mentions that "crude stone tools" were discovered in the same area as the painted rock fragments, it never explains what those tools were used for. The passage discusses hunting as a subject of the artwork, and it mentions the discovery of tools, but it never links the two by saying the tools were used to hunt animals. Therefore, we do not have enough information to agree or disagree with the statement.
Q36 NO At different levels of excavation, she located fallen painted rock fragments, which she was able to date to at least 36,000 years ago
Several North American researchers have gone further and suggested that the rock-art from this site dates from no earlier than about 3,730 years ago, based on the results of limited radiocarbon dating
Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage shows that Niéde Guidon found evidence that the art is 36,000 years old, but North American scientists argue that it is actually only about 3,730 years old.
Answer Explanation:
The answer is "NO" because North American researchers do not agree with Niéde Guidon. They think the art is much newer than she says it is.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is NO because the text shows a clear disagreement between the findings of Niéde Guidon and those of North American researchers. Guidon dates the art fragments to at least 36,000 years ago. However, the North American researchers suggest the art is significantly younger, estimating it to be no older than about 3,730 years. Since their date is much later, they are contradicting her claims rather than confirming them.
Q37 C Of course, dating the art is extremely difficult given the non-existence of plant and animal remains that might be scientifically dated Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that scientists have a hard time figuring out the age of the paintings because they cannot find any leftovers from plants or animals that they could test.
Answer Explanation:
The answer means that things which come from plants or animals are not at the places where the rock art was found.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is C because the text states that dating the art is very hard because there is a 'non-existence' of plant and animal remains. In this context, 'non-existence' is a synonym for being 'absent' from the sites. Because these materials are not there, scientists cannot use them to figure out exactly how old the rock art is.
Q38 E Critics, mainly from North America, have suggested that the hearths may in fact be a natural phenomenon, the result of seasonal brushwood fires Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that some experts disagree with the idea that humans made these fireplaces. Instead, they believe the fires could have started naturally from bushes burning at certain times of the year.
Answer Explanation:
The answer means that the debate about the ancient fireplaces focuses on whether these fires were built by humans or if they occurred naturally on their own.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is E because the text mentions that there is a disagreement among researchers regarding the origin of the hearths (fireplaces). While some archaeologists see them as evidence of early human life, others claim they might just be a 'natural phenomenon' caused by forest fires. Therefore, the core of the discussion is whether these hearths are 'man-made' or natural. Keywords to notice are 'critics' and 'natural phenomenon,' which contrast with the idea of humans intentionally building a fireplace.
Q39 A With fierce debates thus raging over the dating, where these artists originate from is also still very much open to speculation. The traditional view ignores all the early dating evidence from the South American rock-art sites. In a revised scenario, some palaeo-anthropologists are now suggesting that modern humans may have migrated from Africa using the strong currents of the Atlantic Ocean some 60,000 years or more ago, while others suggest a more improbable colonisation coming from the Pacific Ocean Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage says that there are very strong arguments about who these artists were and where they came from. It shows that scientists (palaeo-anthropologists) are guessing different ways people could have arrived, like crossing the ocean, because they do not have a single agreed-upon answer.
Answer Explanation:
The answer is A because experts are having many disagreements and discussions about how and where the first people in South America came from.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is A. The passage explains that the origin of these early artists is still 'open to speculation' and mentions 'fierce debates'. It specifically highlights that 'palaeo-anthropologists' are proposing new ideas, such as migration from Africa or across the Pacific, which differ from the traditional view. This high level of disagreement and different ideas among experts directly matches the phrase 'giving rise to a great deal of debate'.
Q40 B Despite the compelling evidence from South America, it stands alone: the earliest secure human evidence yet found in the state of Oregon in North America only dates to 12,300 years BC Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that while South America has very old evidence, the oldest confirmed human evidence in Oregon is only about 12,300 years BC, which is much later than the evidence found in Brazil.
Answer Explanation:
The answer means that the discoveries made by scientists in Oregon do not help prove that humans lived in America as early as some older dates suggest.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is B because the passage points out a big difference in the ages of the evidence found in South America versus North America. While some evidence in Brazil suggests people lived there 36,000 or even 46,000 years ago, the oldest reliable evidence found in Oregon is only from 12,300 BC. Because 12,300 BC is much more recent (not as old) as the dates found in Brazil, the Oregon finds do not support those very early dates for human arrival in the Americas.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.