Endless Harvest - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From Cambridge IELTS 07 Academic Reading Test 4 · Part 2 · Questions 14–26
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 14-26, which are based on Reading Passage 2 below.
Endless Harvest
More than two hundred years ago, Russian explorers and fur hunters landed on the Aleutian Islands, a volcanic archipelago in the North Pacific, and learned of a land mass that lay farther to the north. The islands' native inhabitants called this land mass Aleyska, the 'Great Land'; today, we know it as Alaska.
The forty-ninth state to join the United States of America (in 1959), Alaska is fully one-fifth the size of the mainland 48 states combined. It shares, with Canada, the second longest river system in North America and has over half the coastline of the United States. The rivers feed into the Bering Sea and Gulf of Alaska - cold, nutrient-rich waters which support tens of millions of seabirds, and over 400 species of fish, shellfish, crustaceans, and molluscs. Taking advantage of this rich bounty, Alaska's commercial fisheries have developed into some of the largest in the world.
According to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G), Alaska's commercial fisheries landed hundreds of thousands of tonnes of shellfish and herring, and well over a million tonnes of groundfish (cod, sole, perch and pollock) in 2000. The true cultural heart and soul of Alaska's fisheries, however, is salmon. 'Salmon,' notes writer Susan Ewing in The Great Alaska Nature Factbook, 'pump through Alaska like blood through a heart, bringing rhythmic, circulating nourishment to land, animals and people.' The 'predictable abundance of salmon allowed some native cultures to flourish,' and 'dying spawners* feed bears, eagles, other animals, and ultimately the soil itself.' All five species of Pacific salmon - chinook, or king; chum, or dog; coho, or silver; sockeye, or red; and pink, or humpback - spawn** in Alaskan waters, and 90% of all Pacific salmon commercially caught in North America are produced there. Indeed, if Alaska was an independent nation, it would be the largest producer of wild salmon in the world. During 2000, commercial catches of Pacific salmon in Alaska exceeded 320,000 tonnes, with an ex-vessel value of over $US260 million.
Catches have not always been so healthy. Between 1940 and 1959, overfishing led to crashes in salmon populations so severe that in 1953 Alaska was declared a federal disaster area. With the onset of statehood, however, the State of Alaska took over management of its own fisheries, guided by a state constitution which mandates that Alaska's natural resources be managed on a sustainable basis. At that time, statewide harvests totalled around 25 million salmon. Over the next few decades average catches steadily increased as a result of this policy of sustainable management, until, during the 1990s, annual harvests were well in excess of 100 million, and on several occasions over 200 million fish.
The primary reason for such increases is what is known as 'In-Season Abundance-Based Management'. There are biologists throughout the state constantly monitoring adult fish as they show up to spawn. The biologists sit in streamside counting towers, study sonar, watch from aeroplanes, and talk to fishermen. The salmon season in Alaska is not pre-set. The fishermen know the approximate time of year when they will be allowed to fish, but on any given day, one or more field biologists in a particular area can put a halt to fishing. Even sport fishing can be brought to a halt. It is this management mechanism that has allowed Alaska salmon stocks - and, accordingly, Alaska salmon fisheries - to prosper, even as salmon populations in the rest of the United States are increasingly considered threatened or even endangered.
In 1999, the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC)*** commissioned a review of the Alaska salmon fishery. The Council, which was founded in 1996, certifies fisheries that meet high environmental standards, enabling them to use a label that recognises their environmental responsibility. The MSC has established a set of criteria by which commercial fisheries can be judged. Recognising the potential benefits of being identified as environmentally responsible, fisheries approach the Council requesting to undergo the certification process. The MSC then appoints a certification committee, composed of a panel of fisheries experts, which gathers information and opinions from fishermen, biologists, government officials, industry representatives, non-governmental organisations and others.
Some observers thought the Alaska salmon fisheries would not have any chance of certification when, in the months leading up to MSC's final decision, salmon runs throughout western Alaska completely collapsed. In the Yukon and Kuskokwim rivers, chinook and chum runs were probably the poorest since statehood; subsistence communities throughout the region, who normally have priority over commercial fishing, were devastated.
The crisis was completely unexpected, but researchers believe it had nothing to do with impacts of fisheries. Rather, they contend, it was almost certainly the result of climatic shifts, prompted in part by cumulative effects of the el niño/la niña phenomenon on Pacific Ocean temperatures, culminating in a harsh winter in which huge numbers of salmon eggs were frozen. It could have meant the end as far as the certification process was concerned. However, the state reacted quickly, closing down all fisheries, even those necessary for subsistence purposes.
In September 2000, MSC announced that the Alaska salmon fisheries qualified for certification. Seven companies producing Alaska salmon were immediately granted permission to display the MSC logo on their products. Certification is for an initial period of five years, with an annual review to ensure that the fishery is continuing to meet the required standards.
* spawners: fish that have released eggs
** spawn: release eggs
*** MSC: a joint venture between WWF (World Wildlife Fund) and Unilever, a Dutch-based multi-national
Questions
Questions 14–20 True / False / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 2?
write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
Questions 21–26 Matching Sentence Endings
Complete each sentence with the correct ending, A-K, below.
A. to recognise fisheries that care for the environment.
B. to be successful.
C. to stop fish from spawning.
D. to set up environmental protection laws.
E. to stop people fishing for sport.
F. to label their products using the MSC logo.
G. to ensure that fish numbers are sufficient to permit fishing.
H. to assist the subsistence communities in the region.
I. to freeze a huge number of salmon eggs.
J. to deny certification to the Alaska fisheries.
K. to close down all fisheries.
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q14 | FALSE | The islands' native inhabitants called this land mass Aleyska, the 'Great Land'; today, we know it as Alaska | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the people who lived on the islands used the name 'Aleyska' to describe a different, large piece of land. That land is what we call Alaska today. Answer Explanation: The answer is FALSE because the local people did not name their own islands 'Aleyska'; instead, they used that name for a different, larger area of land located to the north. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the passage explains that the name 'Aleyska' referred to a 'land mass that lay farther to the north' from the Aleutian islands. The question wrongly says the people gave this name to 'their islands'. In the text, 'Aleyska' is the historical name for the place we now call Alaska, which is separate from the Aleutian islands themselves. |
| Q15 | NOT GIVEN | Taking advantage of this rich bounty, Alaska's commercial fisheries have developed into some of the largest in the world | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the fishing business in Alaska is very big, but it does not give information about the people or companies that own these businesses. Answer Explanation: The answer is NOT GIVEN because the text does not say who owns the fisheries or if the owners are big companies from around the world. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because while the text notes that the fisheries themselves are among the 'largest in the world' in terms of size and production, it never mentions the ownership status or the global scale of the companies that own them. It mentions 'commercial fisheries' and 'seven companies' that received certification, but it provides no details about the size or ownership of these business entities themselves compared to other world companies. |
| Q16 | TRUE | 'Salmon,' notes writer Susan Ewing in The Great Alaska Nature Factbook, 'pump through Alaska like blood through a heart, bringing rhythmic, circulating nourishment to land, animals and people.' The 'predictable abundance of salmon allowed some native cultures to flourish,' and 'dying spawners* feed bears, eagles, other animals, and ultimately the soil itself.' | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that salmon are like blood for the state of Alaska, giving life and food to the ground, animals, and humans. It says that having a lot of salmon helped native people live well and grow, while the fish also provide food for wild animals like bears and eagles. Answer Explanation: The answer TRUE means that the information in the text agrees that living creatures and people in Alaska rely on salmon to survive. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the passage compares salmon to blood in a heart, which is necessary for life. It explains that salmon provides food and nourishment for the land, animals (like bears and eagles), and people. It also notes that having plenty of salmon allowed native groups to grow strong and that the fish even feed the soil itself. |
| Q17 | NOT GIVEN | All five species of Pacific salmon - chinook, or king; chum, or dog; coho, or silver; sockeye, or red; and pink, or humpback - spawn** in Alaskan waters, and 90% of all Pacific salmon commercially caught in North America are produced there | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage lists five types of salmon and says that Alaska produces 90% of all these salmon caught in North America. It does not mention the specific percentage for sockeye or pink salmon alone. Answer Explanation: The answer is NOT GIVEN because the passage does not provide enough information to know if sockeye or pink salmon make up ninety per cent of the catch. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because while the passage mentions the figure '90%', it relates to the location where the fish are produced, not the specific species. It states that 90% of all Pacific salmon caught in North America come from Alaska. The passage lists five species of salmon (chinook, chum, coho, sockeye, and pink), but it never specifies what percentage of the total catch belongs to each individual species or a combination of them. Therefore, we cannot confirm or deny the statement. |
| Q18 | TRUE | During 2000, commercial catches of Pacific salmon in Alaska exceeded 320,000 tonnes, with an ex-vessel value of over $US260 million | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that in the year 2000, the weight of salmon caught for business was more than 320,000 tonnes. Answer Explanation: The answer is TRUE, which means the text confirms that people caught more than 320,000 tonnes of salmon in Alaska in the year 2000. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the text specifically mentions the amount of salmon caught in 2000. It uses the word 'exceeded', which means to go beyond or be more than a certain number. Since 320,000 tonnes was exceeded, the statement in the question is correct. |
| Q19 | TRUE | Between 1940 and 1959, overfishing led to crashes in salmon populations so severe that in 1953 Alaska was declared a federal disaster area | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that from 1940 to 1959, catching too many fish led to a huge loss of salmon. This situation was treated as a major emergency by the government in 1953. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the statement is correct according to the text: there was a very big drop in the number of salmon in Alaska from 1940 to 1959. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the passage explicitly mentions that during the years 1940 to 1959, the salmon population experienced 'crashes.' A 'crash' in this context means a sudden and large decrease in numbers. The text notes that this was caused by overfishing and was so bad that Alaska was named a disaster area in 1953. This directly matches the idea of a sharp decrease. |
| Q20 | FALSE | until, during the 1990s, annual harvests were well in excess of 100 million, and on several occasions over 200 million fish | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that throughout the 1990s, the total amount of salmon caught each year was much greater than 100 million, and in some years, it was even more than 200 million. Answer Explanation: The answer is FALSE because the text says the number of fish caught was much higher than the number mentioned in the question. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the passage states that during the 1990s, the yearly catches of salmon were 'well in excess of 100 million'. This phrase means the amount was much more than 100 million, not exactly 100 million. It also mentions that sometimes more than 200 million fish were caught. |
| Q21 | G | There are biologists throughout the state constantly monitoring adult fish as they show up to spawn The salmon season in Alaska is not pre-set. The fishermen know the approximate time of year when they will be allowed to fish, but on any given day, one or more field biologists in a particular area can put a halt to fishing |
Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that experts watch the fish closely as they return to lay eggs. Since the timing for when people can fish is not decided in advance, these experts can stop fishing on any day to make sure there are always enough fish left. Answer Explanation: The answer means biologists watch the number of grown fish to make sure there are enough for people to be allowed to catch them. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is supported by the fifth paragraph, which explains that biologists watch ('monitor') adult fish using tools like sonar and planes. They do this because the fishing season is not fixed; instead, it depends on whether there are enough fish. If the biologists see that the fish numbers are too low, they have the power to stop ('put a halt to') fishing immediately. This ensures that fishing only happens when there is a 'sufficient' or high enough amount of fish. |
| Q22 | E | on any given day, one or more field biologists in a particular area can put a halt to fishing. Even sport fishing can be brought to a halt | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that biologists have the right to stop all fishing activities immediately if necessary. This specifically includes stopping people who are fishing for sport. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the scientists who study the fish (biologists) have the power to stop people from fishing for fun or as a hobby. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is E because the passage explains a system where fish numbers are watched very closely. In this system, biologists can decide to end the fishing season at any moment to protect the fish. This power includes the ability to stop 'sport fishing,' which is another name for fishing as a hobby or for fun. The phrase 'put a halt to' in the text is a synonym for 'stop.' |
| Q23 | B | It is this management mechanism that has allowed Alaska salmon stocks - and, accordingly, Alaska salmon fisheries - to prosper, even as salmon populations in the rest of the United States are increasingly considered threatened or even endangered | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that this specific management system helped the fish groups and the fishing business grow healthy and strong, even though salmon in other parts of the country are having a very hard time. Answer Explanation: The answer says that the special way fish are managed in Alaska helped the salmon fishing business be successful. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is based on the passage stating that 'In-Season Abundance-Based Management' has allowed Alaska's salmon fisheries to 'prosper.' In this context, the word prosper is a synonym for flourish or be successful. This management style is credited with keeping the fishing industry strong while salmon populations in other parts of the United States are struggling. |
| Q24 | A | The Council, which was founded in 1996, certifies fisheries that meet high environmental standards, enabling them to use a label that recognises their environmental responsibility | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that this group helps fishing businesses by giving them a special label if they follow strong rules for nature. This label shows that the fishery is being responsible and taking care of the environment. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the group called the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) was created to show which fishing businesses do a good job of protecting and looking after nature. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because the text says the Council gives certificates to fishing companies that follow strict rules to keep the environment safe. By doing this, they allow these companies to use a special sticker or logo. This logo tells people that the company is acting in a way that respects and cares for the environment. Key words from the text like 'environmental standards' and 'environmental responsibility' match the idea of 'caring for the environment' in the answer choice. |
| Q25 | K | However, the state reacted quickly, closing down all fisheries, even those necessary for subsistence purposes | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that when the number of salmon crashed, the government did not wait; they immediately made it illegal to fish in those areas, even for people who needed the fish for food. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the Alaskan government chose to stop all fishing activities entirely. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is supported by the text's description of the 1999 crisis. When the number of salmon returning to the rivers (referred to as 'salmon runs') dropped suddenly and unexpectedly, the government (the state) took immediate action. To protect the fish populations during this emergency, they shut down all types of fishing. This included commercial fishing and even 'subsistence' fishing, which is when people catch fish specifically for food to survive. The use of 'closing down all fisheries' in the text matches option K. |
| Q26 | F | In September 2000, MSC announced that the Alaska salmon fisheries qualified for certification. Seven companies producing Alaska salmon were immediately granted permission to display the MSC logo on their products | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that by September 2000, Alaska's salmon fishing passed a test to prove it was done correctly. As a result, seven companies were told they could start putting the MSC sign on their items immediately. Answer Explanation: The answer means that in September 2000, seven businesses in Alaska were given permission to put the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) symbol on the fish products they sell. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is chosen because the text explicitly mentions that in September 2000, seven Alaskan salmon companies were allowed to show the MSC logo on what they produce. This happened after the MSC decided that the way these companies fish is good for the environment. In the question, 'label their products' is another way of saying 'display the logo on their products.' |
