Pulling Strings To Build Pyramids - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From Cambridge IELTS 07 Academic Reading Test 4 · Part 1 · Questions 1–13
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on Reading Passage 1 below.
Pulling strings to build pyramids
No one knows exactly how the pyramids were built. Marcus Chown reckons the answer could be 'hanging in the air'.
The pyramids of Egypt were built more than three thousand years ago, and no one knows how. The conventional picture is that tens of thousands of slaves dragged stones on sledges. But there is no evidence to back this up. Now a Californian software consultant called Maureen Clemmons has suggested that kites might have been involved. While perusing a book on the monuments of Egypt, she noticed a hieroglyph that showed a row of men standing in odd postures. They were holding what looked like ropes that led, via some kind of mechanical system, to a giant bird in the sky. She wondered if perhaps the bird was actually a giant kite, and the men were using it to lift a heavy object.
Intrigued, Clemmons contacted Morteza Gharib, aeronautics professor at the California Institute of Technology. He was fascinated by the idea. 'Coming from Iran, I have a keen interest in Middle Eastern science,' he says. He too was puzzled by the picture that had sparked Clemmons's interest. The object in the sky apparently had wings far too short and wide for a bird. 'The possibility certainly existed that it was a kite,' he says. And since he needed a summer project for his student Emilio Graff, investigating the possibility of using kites as heavy lifters seemed like a good idea.
Gharib and Graff set themselves the task of raising a 4.5-metre stone column from horizontal to vertical, using no source of energy except the wind. Their initial calculations and scale-model wind-tunnel experiments convinced them they wouldn't need a strong wind to lift the 33.5-tonne column. Even a modest force, if sustained over a long time, would do. The key was to use a pulley system that would magnify the applied force. So they rigged up a tent-shaped scaffold directly above the tip of the horizontal column, with pulleys suspended from the scaffold's apex. The idea was that as one end of the column rose, the base would roll across the ground on a trolley.
Earlier this year, the team put Clemmons's unlikely theory to the test, using a 40-square-metre rectangular nylon sail. The kite lifted the column clean off the ground. 'We were absolutely stunned,' Gharib says. 'The instant the sail opened into the wind, a huge force was generated and the column was raised to the vertical in a mere 40 seconds.'
The wind was blowing at a gentle 16 to 20 kilometres an hour, little more than half what they thought would be needed. What they had failed to reckon with was what happened when the kite was opened. 'There was a huge initial force - five times larger than the steady state force,' Gharib says. This jerk meant that kites could lift huge weights, Gharib realised. Even a 300-tonne column could have been lifted to the vertical with 40 or so men and four or five sails. So Clemmons was right: the pyramid builders could have used kites to lift massive stones into place. 'Whether they actually did is another matter,' Gharib says. There are no pictures showing the construction of the pyramids, so there is no way to tell what really happened. 'The evidence for using kites to move large stones is no better or worse than the evidence for the brute force method,' Gharib says.
Indeed, the experiments have left many specialists unconvinced. 'The evidence for kite-lifting is non-existent,' says Willeke Wendrich, an associate professor of Egyptology at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Others feel there is more of a case for the theory. Harnessing the wind would not have been a problem for accomplished sailors like the Egyptians. And they are known to have used wooden pulleys, which could have been made strong enough to bear the weight of massive blocks of stone. In addition, there is some physical evidence that the ancient Egyptians were interested in flight. A wooden artefact found on the step pyramid at Saqqara looks uncannily like a modern glider. Although it dates from several hundred years after the building of the pyramids, its sophistication suggests that the Egyptians might have been developing ideas of flight for a long time. And other ancient civilisations certainly knew about kites; as early as 1250 BC, the Chinese were using them to deliver messages and dump flaming debris on their foes.
The experiments might even have practical uses nowadays. There are plenty of places around the globe where people have no access to heavy machinery, but do know how to deal with wind, sailing and basic mechanical principles. Gharib has already been contacted by a civil engineer in Nicaragua, who wants to put up buildings with adobe roofs supported by concrete arches on a site that heavy equipment can't reach. His idea is to build the arches horizontally, then lift them into place using kites. 'We've given him some design hints,' says Gharib. 'We're just waiting for him to report back.' So whether they were actually used to build the pyramids or not, it seems that kites may make sensible construction tools in the 21st century AD.
Questions
Questions 1–7 True / False / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?
write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
Questions 8–13 Summary Completion
Complete the summary below.
Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.
Additional evidence for theory of kite-lifting
The Egyptians had 8 , which could lift large pieces of 9 , and they knew how to use the energy of the wind from their skill as 10 .
The discovery on one pyramid of an object which resembled a 11 suggests they may have experimented with 12 . In addition, over two thousand years ago kites were used in China as weapons, as well as for sending 13 .
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | TRUE | The conventional picture is that tens of thousands of slaves dragged stones on sledges | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the standard idea most people have is that many thousands of workers moved the heavy stones using sleds. Answer Explanation: The answer means it is true that most people think many thousands of workers were used to build the pyramids. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the passage mentions the 'conventional picture,' which means the most common or usual idea people have. It says that this common idea involves 'tens of thousands of slaves.' This matches the phrase 'generally believed' and 'large numbers of people' in the question. |
| Q2 | FALSE | While perusing a book on the monuments of Egypt, she noticed a hieroglyph that showed a row of men standing in odd postures | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage clearly shows that Maureen Clemmons was reading or looking through a book when she saw the picture, rather than discovering it on the actual stone wall of a building. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the statement is incorrect because it does not match the information given in the text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the passage states that Clemmons found the hieroglyph while 'perusing a book' about Egyptian monuments. The statement says she found it 'on the wall' of a monument, which contradicts the fact that she was actually looking at a book in her hands. Keywords like 'perusing' and 'book' clarify where she saw the image. |
| Q3 | NOT GIVEN | Clemmons contacted Morteza Gharib, aeronautics professor at the California Institute of Technology. He was fascinated by the idea. 'Coming from Iran, I have a keen interest in Middle Eastern science,' he says | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage introduces Gharib as a university teacher who likes Middle Eastern science, but it does not provide any information about his previous research or experiments involving birds. Answer Explanation: The answer is NOT GIVEN because the text does not say if Gharib had done experiments on bird flight before his work on the kites. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because while the passage tells us about Gharib's job and his interest in history, it never mentions any past experiments he might have done with birds. The text says he is an aeronautics professor and has a 'keen interest' in science from the Middle East, but it stays silent about his specific history with bird flight research. |
| Q4 | TRUE | Their initial calculations and scale-model wind-tunnel experiments convinced them they wouldn't need a strong wind to lift the 33.5-tonne column | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the researchers used math and small-scale testing (models in a wind tunnel) to make sure their theory was correct before trying to move the actual heavy column. Answer Explanation: The answer is TRUE because Gharib and Graff performed small tests to see if their ideas worked before they tried to lift a real, heavy stone. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the passage explains that Gharib and Graff did not jump straight into the final experiment. Instead, they performed 'initial calculations' and used 'scale-model wind-tunnel experiments' first. A 'scale-model' is a smaller version of something used for testing. These steps were taken to prove their theory would work before they applied it (the application being the full-sized test) to a large 33.5-tonne column. |
| Q5 | FALSE | The wind was blowing at a gentle 16 to 20 kilometres an hour, little more than half what they thought would be needed. What they had failed to reckon with was what happened when the kite was opened. 'There was a huge initial force — five times larger than the steady state force,' Gharib says | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the wind was not fast; it was actually slow or "gentle" and much weaker than the scientists thought they needed. The real reason the experiment worked was because of a very strong pull, called an "initial force," that happened right when the kite was opened. Answer Explanation: The answer is FALSE because the statement says the experiment worked because the wind was fast, but the passage says the wind was actually slow and "gentle." Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the passage states the wind speed during the experiment was only 16 to 20 kilometres an hour, describing it as 'gentle' and 'little more than half' of what the scientists expected to need. The success was actually caused by a 'huge initial force' or a 'jerk' that happened the moment the kite opened, rather than a high wind speed. |
| Q6 | NOT GIVEN | — | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: Answer Explanation: Reason For Correctness: |
| Q7 | TRUE | This jerk meant that kites could lift huge weights, Gharib realised. Even a 300-tonne column could have been lifted to the vertical with 40 or so men and four or five sails. So Clemmons was right: the pyramid builders could have used kites to lift massive stones into place | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the researcher noticed a strong pull from the kite that allowed it to move very heavy things. He figured out that with enough men and kite-sails, they could lift objects weighing 300 tonnes. This led him to agree that people in the past could have used kites to move very big rocks into the right spots. Answer Explanation: The answer is TRUE because the text confirms that the group of researchers found it was definitely possible to lift giant, heavy rocks using kites. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the passage describes an experiment where Professor Gharib and his team used a kite to lift a stone column. After seeing how much force the kite made, Gharib concluded that 'huge weights' could be moved this way. He even calculated that a 300-tonne rock—which is very heavy—could be lifted with just a few kites and some men. This proves the team agreed that kites were a possible tool for 'massive stones'. |
| Q8 | wooden pulleys / pulleys | And they are known to have used wooden pulleys, which could have been made strong enough to bear the weight of massive blocks of stone | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Egyptians used pulleys made of wood. It says these tools could hold the weight of very big and heavy stones. Answer Explanation: The answer refers to wooden pulleys, which are simple wheel-based tools used to help lift heavy things. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'wooden pulleys' because the text says these were tools the Egyptians used. According to the passage, these specific tools were strong enough to support the heavy weight of huge pieces of stone used in building. The word 'massive' in the text matches the idea of 'large pieces' in the summary. |
| Q9 | stone | And they are known to have used wooden pulleys, which could have been made strong enough to bear the weight of massive blocks of stone | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that the Egyptians used simple machines made of wood, called pulleys, which were powerful enough to hold up and move very heavy pieces of stone. Answer Explanation: The answer "stone" refers to the heavy building material that the Egyptians had to move to construct the pyramids. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is "stone" because the passage explains that the Egyptians had tools called wooden pulleys. These tools were strong enough to carry or lift the very heavy weight of large blocks of stone. The summary uses the phrase "large pieces of stone" to describe what the pulley system was capable of lifting. |
| Q10 | accomplished sailors / sailors | Harnessing the wind would not have been a problem for accomplished sailors like the Egyptians | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that because the Egyptians were very good at sailing, using the power of the wind was not a difficult task for them. Answer Explanation: The answer refers to people who are skilled at traveling on water and controlling boats using the wind. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer comes from the part of the text discussing why the wind-usage theory is believable. It states that 'harnessing' (or controlling) the wind was easy for the Egyptians because they were 'accomplished sailors'. This explains that their existing knowledge of wind-powered travel would help them use kites for building. The word 'sailors' is the specific group of people with the necessary skills mentioned in the passage. |
| Q11 | modern glider / glider | A wooden artefact found on the step pyramid at Saqqara looks uncannily like a modern glider | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that researchers found an old wooden object on a pyramid in Egypt. This object looks very similar to a glider, which is a modern plane that stays in the air using wind power. Answer Explanation: The answer is a type of light aircraft that flies through the air using the wind instead of an engine. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is found in the section discussing physical evidence that ancient Egyptians were interested in flight. The passage mentions that a wooden object discovered at the Saqqara pyramid looks exactly like a 'modern glider'. The word 'resembled' in the summary task is a synonym for 'looks uncannily like' used in the text. |
| Q12 | flight | A wooden artefact found on the step pyramid at Saqqara looks uncannily like a modern glider. Although it dates from several hundred years after the building of the pyramids, its sophistication suggests that the Egyptians might have been developing ideas of flight for a long time | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that researchers found a wooden object on a pyramid that looks very much like a modern plane without an engine (a glider). It suggests that the people of ancient Egypt were thinking about and potentially practicing the science of moving through the air for a very long time. Answer Explanation: The answer "flight" refers to the act or science of moving through the air. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is derived from the section of the passage discussing physical evidence found on an ancient Egyptian pyramid. The passage describes a wooden object that looks like a glider, which is a type of aircraft. The complexity, or sophistication, of this object implies that the Egyptians were not just curious but were actively testing and developing concepts related to flying over a long period. |
| Q13 | messages | And other ancient civilisations certainly knew about kites; as early as 1250 BC, the Chinese were using them to deliver messages and dump flaming debris on their foes | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that around the year 1250 BC, people in China used kites for two main things: sending notes to other people and dropping fire on their enemies during battles. Answer Explanation: The answer "messages" refers to written notes or pieces of information sent from one person to another person. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is supported by the text's description of how kites were used in ancient China. The summary mentions two uses: as weapons and for another purpose. The passage specifies that the Chinese used kites to "dump flaming debris on their foes" (which matches the "weapons" part of the summary) and "to deliver messages" (which matches the "sending" part of the summary). |
