The Great Australian Fence - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From IELTS Practice Test Plus 1 Academic Reading Test 4 · Part 1 · Questions 1–13
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1–13 which are based on the Reading Passage below.
The Great Australian Fence
A war has been going on for almost a hundred years between the sheep farmers of Australia and the dingo, Australia's wild dog. To protect their livelihood, the farmers built a wire fence, 3,307 miles of continuous wire mesh, reaching from the coast of South Australia all the way to the cotton fields of eastern Queensland, just short of the Pacific Ocean.
The Fence is Australia's version of the Great Wall of China, but even longer, erected to keep out hostile invaders, in this case hordes of yellow dogs. The empire it preserves is that of the woolgrowers, sovereigns of the world's second largest sheep flock, after China's – some 123 million head – and keepers of a wool export business worth four billion dollars. Never mind that more and more people – conservationists, politicians, taxpayers and animal lovers – say that such a barrier would never be allowed today on ecological grounds. With sections of it almost a hundred years old, the dog fence has become, as conservationist Lindsay Fairweather ruefully admits, 'an icon of Australian frontier ingenuity'.
To appreciate this unusual outback monument and to meet the people whose livelihoods depend on it, I spent part of an Australian autumn travelling the wire. It's known by different names in different states: the Dog Fence in South Australia, the Border Fence in New South Wales and the Barrier Fence in Queensland. I would call it simply the Fence.
For most of its prodigious length, this epic fence winds like a river across a landscape that, unless a big rain has fallen, scarcely has rivers. The eccentric route, prescribed mostly by property lines, provides a sampler of outback topography: the Fence goes over sand dunes, past salt lakes, up and down rock-strewn hills, through dense scrub and across barren plains.
The Fence stays away from towns. Where it passes near a town, it has actually become a tourist attraction visited on bus tours. It marks the traditional dividing line between cattle and sheep. Inside, where the dingoes are legally classified as vermin, they are shot, poisoned and trapped. Sheep and dingoes do not mix and the Fence sends that message mile after mile.
What is this creature that by itself threatens an entire industry, inflicting several millions of dollars of damage a year despite the presence of the world's most obsessive fence? Cousin to the coyote and the jackal, descended from the Asian wolf, Canis lupus dingo is an introduced species of wild dog. Skeletal remains indicate that the dingo was introduced to Australia more than 3,500 years ago probably with Asian seafarers who landed on the north coast. The adaptable dingo spread rapidly and in a short time became the top predator, killing off all its marsupial competitors. The dingo looks like a small wolf with a long nose, short pointed ears and a bushy tail. Dingoes rarely bark; they yelp and howl. Standing about 22 inches at the shoulder - slightly taller than a coyote - the dingo is Australia's largest land carnivore.
The woolgrowers' war against dingoes, which is similar to the sheep ranchers' rage against coyotes in the US, started not long after the first European settlers disembarked in 1788, bringing with them a cargo of sheep. Dingoes officially became outlaws in 1830 when governments placed a bounty on their heads. Today bounties for problem dogs killing sheep inside the Fence can reach $500. As pioneers penetrated the interior with their flocks of sheep, fences replaced shepherds until, by the end of the 19th century, thousands of miles of barrier fencing crisscrossed the vast grazing lands.
'The dingo started out as a quiet observer,' writes Roland Breckwoldt, in A Very Elegant Animal: The Dingo, 'but soon came to represent everything that was dark and dangerous on the continent.' It is estimated that since sheep arrived in Australia, dingo numbers have increased a hundredfold. Though dingoes have been eradicated from parts of Australia, an educated guess puts the population at more than a million.
Eventually government officials and graziers agreed that one well-maintained fence, placed on the outer rim of sheep country and paid for by taxes levied on woolgrowers, should supplant the maze of private netting. By 1960, three states joined their barriers to form a single dog fence.
The intense private battles between woolgrowers and dingoes have usually served to define the Fence only in economic terms. It marks the difference between profit and loss. Yet the Fence casts a much broader ecological shadow for it has become a kind of terrestrial dam, deflecting the flow of animals inside and out. The ecological side effects appear most vividly at Sturt National Park. In 1845, explorer Charles Sturt led an expedition through these parts on a futile search for an inland sea. For Sturt and other early explorers, it was a rare event to see a kangaroo. Now they are ubiquitous for without a native predator the kangaroo population has exploded inside the Fence. Kangaroos are now cursed more than dingoes. They have become the rivals of sheep, competing for water and grass. In response state governments cull* more than three million kangaroos a year to keep Australia's national symbol from overrunning the pastoral lands. Park officials, who recognise that the fence is to blame, respond to the excess of kangaroos by saying 'The fence is there, and we have to live with it.'
*Cull = to kill animals to reduce their population.
Questions
Questions 1–4 Multiple Choice (One Answer)
Choose the appropriate letters A–D.
Questions 5–11 Yes / No / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?
Write
YES if the statement agrees with the information
NO if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this in the passage
Questions 12–13 Multiple Choice (One Answer)
Choose the appropriate letters A–D.
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | D | A war has been going on for almost a hundred years between the sheep farmers of Australia and the dingo, Australia's wild dog. To protect their livelihood, the farmers built a wire fence, 3,307 miles of continuous wire mesh, reaching from the coast of South Australia all the way to the cotton fields of eastern Queensland, just short of the Pacific Ocean The empire it preserves is that of the woolgrowers, sovereigns of the world's second largest sheep flock, after China's – some 123 million head – and keepers of a wool export business worth four billion dollars |
Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that sheep farmers built the fence to keep their way of making money safe from wild dogs called dingoes. It also says that the fence helps to save the business of people who grow wool and sell it, and this business is worth a lot of money. Answer Explanation: The answer means the fence was made to keep the business of making and selling wool from sheep safe. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is supported by the passage, which explains that the fence was built by 'sheep farmers' to 'protect their livelihood' from dingoes. The passage then clarifies that this livelihood is linked to 'woolgrowers' and a 'wool export business'. The dingoes caused 'several millions of dollars of damage a year', directly threatening this 'entire industry', thus making the protection of the Australian wool industry the primary reason for the fence's construction. |
| Q2 | B | Never mind that more and more people – conservationists, politicians, taxpayers and animal lovers – say that such a barrier would never be allowed today on ecological grounds | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that many people, including those who protect nature and those in government, believe that a fence like this would not be built today because it would be bad for the Earth and its living things. Answer Explanation: The answer means that people who work to protect nature (conservationists) and government officials (politicians) both think the big fence causes harm to the natural world. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because the passage clearly states that 'conservationists' and 'politicians' share the view that such a fence would 'never be allowed today on ecological grounds'. This means they both agree that because of its impact on the environment (ecology), building such a barrier would not be permitted in modern times. This directly aligns with the idea that the fence poses a threat or problem to the environment. |
| Q3 | C | To appreciate this unusual outback monument and to meet the people whose livelihoods depend on it, I spent part of an Australian autumn travelling the wire | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the author wanted to understand and value the special fence, which it calls an 'outback monument'. The author also wanted to talk to the people who make their living because of the fence. This means the author was interested in the fence itself and the people living near it. Answer Explanation: The answer means the author traveled to Australia because they wanted to learn about the fence and the people who live and work near it. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is supported by the passage, which clearly states the author's reasons for visiting. The author wanted to 'appreciate this unusual outback monument' (referring to the fence) and 'to meet the people whose livelihoods depend on it' (referring to the life and people connected to the fence). This directly matches the idea of being 'interested in life around the fence'. |
| Q4 | A | To appreciate this unusual outback monument and to meet the people whose livelihoods depend on it, I spent part of an Australian autumn travelling the wire | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says the author wanted 'to appreciate' this 'unusual outback monument'. This means he wanted to see and understand how special and remarkable the fence is, showing that he feels impressed by it. Answer Explanation: The answer means the author thinks the fence is very amazing and remarkable. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'impressed' because the author states his desire 'to appreciate' the fence, which he describes as an 'unusual outback monument'. This directly shows his admiration for its scale and significance. He also highlights its grandeur by comparing it to the Great Wall of China and noting it's 'even longer', and uses terms like 'prodigious length' and 'epic fence', all of which convey a sense of awe and wonder. |
| Q5 | NO | It's known by different names in different states: the Dog Fence in South Australia, the Border Fence in New South Wales and the Barrier Fence in Queensland. I would call it simply the Fence | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that people call the fence by different names depending on which state it is in, like 'Dog Fence' or 'Border Fence.' But the person writing the passage says they would just call it 'the Fence,' meaning it's still the same fence with the same job, no matter what its local name is. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the statement is not true. The fence actually serves the same purpose in all the states, not different ones. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'NO' because the passage clearly states that the fence has 'different names' in different states, but it never mentions that its purpose changes. Instead, the passage consistently describes the fence's main goal as protecting sheep from dingoes across all areas. For example, it explains that different states 'joined their barriers to form a single dog fence,' which implies a shared, unified purpose, despite the local variations in its name. |
| Q6 | YES | Yet the Fence casts a much broader ecological shadow for it has become a kind of terrestrial dam, deflecting the flow of animals inside and out. The ecological side effects appear most vividly at Sturt National Park. In 1845, explorer Charles Sturt led an expedition through these parts on a futile search for an inland sea. For Sturt and other early explorers, it was a rare event to see a kangaroo. Now they are ubiquitous for without a native predator the kangaroo population has exploded inside the Fence. Kangaroos are now cursed more than dingoes. They have become the rivals of sheep, competing for water and grass | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the fence has big negative effects on nature. For example, because the fence keeps wild dogs (dingoes) away, there are now too many kangaroos inside the fence. These many kangaroos eat the same food as the sheep, which creates a new problem for the farmers who wanted to protect their sheep with the fence. So, the fence caused a new kind of competition. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the big fence works in some ways, but not completely. It doesn't solve all problems and might even create new ones. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the passage clearly states that while the fence aims to protect sheep from dingoes, it has also created significant unintended problems. The text mentions that the fence "casts a much broader ecological shadow" and that "ecological side effects appear most vividly." Specifically, by keeping dingoes out, the "kangaroo population has exploded inside the Fence," leading to kangaroos becoming "the rivals of sheep, competing for water and grass." This shows that even though the fence is there, a new challenge has emerged, meaning its success is only partial. |
| Q7 | NO | Canis lupus dingo is an introduced species of wild dog. Skeletal remains indicate that the dingo was introduced to Australia more than 3,500 years ago probably with Asian seafarers who landed on the north coast | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the dingo is a type of wild dog that was 'introduced' to Australia. This means people brought it there. It also says that bones show dingoes came to Australia over 3,500 years ago, likely with sailors from Asia who arrived on the north coast. This shows dingoes were not always in Australia; they came from somewhere else. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the statement is false. The dingo is not originally from Australia. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NO because the passage explains that the dingo is an 'introduced species' to Australia. This means it was brought there, not that it naturally started there. The passage further states that dingoes were 'introduced to Australia more than 3,500 years ago probably with Asian seafarers', showing evidence of their arrival from another location. |
| Q8 | YES | It is estimated that since sheep arrived in Australia, dingo numbers have increased a hundredfold | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that ever since sheep came to Australia, the number of dingoes has grown 100 times bigger. This means dingoes became much more numerous because sheep were there. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'YES', which means the statement is true. It says that dingoes, Australia's wild dogs, have grown a lot because of the business of raising sheep. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the passage clearly states that the number of dingoes significantly increased after sheep were introduced to Australia. The text mentions that 'since sheep arrived in Australia, dingo numbers have increased a hundredfold.' This shows a strong connection between the presence of sheep (which is the core of the sheep industry) and the huge growth, or 'flourishing,' of the dingo population. |
| Q9 | NOT GIVEN | What is this creature that by itself threatens an entire industry, inflicting several millions of dollars of damage a year despite the presence of the world's most obsessive fence | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about dingoes causing problems for a whole business, costing millions of dollars each year. This part explains the kind of harm dingoes cause, but it only mentions harming the farming business, not people. Since the passage discusses the danger dingoes pose without mentioning humans, the information about dingoes attacking people is not provided. Answer Explanation: The answer 'NOT GIVEN' means that the passage does not tell us if dingoes are known to attack people. This information is not in the text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'NOT GIVEN' because the passage describes dingoes as a threat primarily to the 'sheep farmers' and the 'woolgrowers' industry. It frequently mentions the 'war' between farmers and dingoes, the 'damage' dingoes cause to the sheep industry, and how they are seen as 'vermin' in areas where sheep are raised. While the passage mentions dingoes as 'dark and dangerous' and as 'the top predator' that killed 'marsupial competitors', it never provides any information or examples of dingoes attacking humans. Therefore, whether dingoes are known to attack humans is not stated in the passage. |
| Q10 | YES | Now they are ubiquitous for without a native predator the kangaroo population has exploded inside the Fence | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that now kangaroos are everywhere because their natural hunters are not there. Because of this, many more kangaroos are now living inside the fence. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the statement is true. The number of kangaroos has gone up because of the fence. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the passage clearly states that the fence has caused the kangaroo population to grow quickly. The text explains that before the fence, it was rare to see a kangaroo. But now, because the fence keeps out dingoes (their natural predators), the 'kangaroo population has exploded inside the Fence'. This directly shows that the fence is responsible for the increase in kangaroos. |
| Q11 | NOT GIVEN | In response state governments cull* more than three million kangaroos a year to keep Australia's national symbol from overrunning the pastoral lands | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that local governments kill more than three million kangaroos each year. This is done to stop the kangaroos, which are a symbol of Australia, from taking over too much land where sheep graze. This part tells us *what* happens, but not what the author thinks about it. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the passage does not tell us if the writer agrees or disagrees with killing kangaroos to control their numbers. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because the passage explains *that* kangaroos are culled (killed to reduce their population) and *why* it happens (because their numbers grew too much due to the fence). It also mentions how park officials feel about it. However, the passage *does not share the author's personal feelings or opinion* about whether this culling is a good or bad thing. The author only reports the facts and others' statements, without giving their own view on the culling of kangaroos. |
| Q12 | B | Dingoes officially became outlaws in 1830 when governments placed a bounty on their heads | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that dingoes officially became 'outlaws' in 1830. This means that in that year, the governments started to see dingoes as rule-breakers and a problem, and they began paying money to people who killed them ('placed a bounty on their heads'). Answer Explanation: The answer B means that the government first saw dingoes as a big problem in the year 1830. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 1830 because the passage states that this was the year when dingoes were officially considered 'outlaws' by the government. This happened when the government started to offer a 'bounty' (money reward) for killing them, showing they recognized the dingoes as a problem that needed to be managed. |
| Q13 | A | Park officials, who recognise that the fence is to blame, respond to the excess of kangaroos by saying 'The fence is there, and we have to live with it.' | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the people who work at the park know the fence caused too many kangaroos. But instead of being upset, they say, "The fence is here, and we must accept it." This means they understand the situation and are not fighting against it; they are simply accepting it as it is. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the park workers feel accepting and calm about the fence, even though it causes problems. They don't seem angry or upset, but rather they understand it's a part of life now. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'philosophical' because the passage describes how park officials deal with the problems caused by the fence, specifically the 'excess of kangaroos.' They acknowledge that 'the fence is to blame' for the increased kangaroo population, but their reaction is to say, 'The fence is there, and we have to live with it.' This statement shows a calm acceptance of a situation that cannot be changed, rather than anger or pleasure. Being 'philosophical' means accepting things as they are, which matches their attitude. |
