The Mozart Effect - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From Collins Practice Tests For IELTS 2 General Training Reading Test 1 · Part 3 · Questions 27–40
Reading Passage
Read the article below and answer Questions 27–40.
The Mozart Effect
In 1993 Frances Rauscher and Gordon Shaw conducted an experiment in which a group of students listened to Mozart's Sonata for Two Pianos in D Major for 10 minutes prior to doing an IQ test. Their results showed a temporary increase in their IQ scores. The media picked up on this and called it 'the Mozart effect'. The discovery had an immediate social and political effect, with the Governor of Georgia, USA, spending $105,000 to give every family in the state a recording of Mozart's music to play to their children.
However, using music in the interest of health has had a long history. Prior to Rauscher and Shaw's experiment, Dr Alfred Tomatis, a French ear, nose and throat specialist, pioneered using music in the treatment of children with speech and communication disorders such as autism or dyslexia. He found that music made a difference in their treatment. Tomatis started to look at the anatomy of sound and how it affects the brain. But why did he choose Mozart instead of other composers?
First of all, Tomatis distinguished between listening and hearing; hearing is seen as a passive process where sounds flood into our awareness, whereas listening is an active process that can be trained. Secondly, he believed that high-frequency sounds stimulate connections between the ear and the central nervous system, and playing music that contains high-frequency sounds is one of the ways we can train children to listen better. Consequently, some pieces of music are better than others and Tomatis found that Mozart's music contains lots of high-frequency sounds. Thus, he thought that Mozart's music could be used in the treatment of certain conditions.
Although other studies have not been able to replicate the original research of Tomatis and Rauscher and Shaw, the idea that music can be an aid to learning has not disappeared. In fact, other studies seem to show that music does have a positive effect on children with communication and learning difficulties. At Aberdare Boys School, Anne Savan taught children with special needs, 'They lacked co-ordination,' she said. 'They were often frustrated with the tasks set for them and became aggressive. The whole thing was a stressful situation.' Savan had been playing background music to the children for five months, and then by chance she played Mozart to them. Almost immediately the children became calmer and more productive. On observing this and making sure it was not an accident, Savan set up a research project with the University of Reading. They measured children's physiological signs (blood pressure, body temperature, respiration and pulse rate) when music was played at the start of a lesson, 20 minutes into the lesson and one hour after the lesson had finished in order to create a profile.
Savan found a 10 per cent drop in the physiological parameters when music was played after 20 minutes. She started by playing Mozart to the children and then progressed to other music, but found that other music produced no statistically significant response. The next thing she tried was to play different Mozart pieces but found that not all his music had an effect: only orchestral music without piano or human voice produced a response. She then looked at the structure of the music and its rhythm: she sped up the music and slowed it down but the children's physiological signs stayed unchanged. She then went on to look at the patterns within the music: she played the music backwards to the children but with only little effect. Like Tomatis before her, Savan experimented with the frequency; she took out the high frequencies and low frequencies in turn but had only a poor response, and concluded that a combination of factors are needed to produce the response.
In an attempt to pin down which combination of factors could be responsible for the effect, in 2001 John Hughes analysed the periodicity, or patterns, in Mozart's music. He found that Mozart's music contained a high level of repetition of patterns within 10–60 seconds of each other. The Sonata for Two Pianos in D Major certainly does contain repetition of musical patterns and phrases as the two pianos play patterns and reply to each other. Unfortunately, despite the promise of early studies and investigations into whether it is the high frequencies within the music, its rhythm or patterns, no direct link has yet been established to definitely prove that the Mozart effect truly exists.
Questions
Questions 27–34 True / False / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the information given in the article?
Write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
Questions 35–40 Matching Features
Write the correct letter, A, B or C, next to Questions 35-40.
A. The action had a positive effect on listeners.
B. The action had a slight effect on listeners.
C. The action had no effect on listeners.
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q27 | NOT GIVEN | The discovery had an immediate social and political effect, with the Governor of Georgia, USA, spending $105,000 to give every family in the state a recording of Mozart's music to play to their children | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the news of the study influenced people and the government, but it does not mention any changes to how teachers teach in a classroom. Answer Explanation: The answer is NOT GIVEN because the article does not say whether the news about the study changed the way teachers teach in schools. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because the text only mentions that the findings had an "immediate social and political effect," such as a government leader giving music to families. While the text mentions a teacher who used Mozart with her students, she did so "by chance" and not because of the result of the announcement. There is no information in the passage to confirm or deny if "teaching methods" in general were changed because of the announcement. |
| Q28 | FALSE | However, using music in the interest of health has had a long history | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that using music to help people with their health and medical issues is something that people have been doing for a long time. Answer Explanation: The answer is FALSE because the statement says that using music for health is a new idea, but the text says it is actually very old. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the passage explicitly states that using music for health has a 'long history'. It mentions that even before the 1993 experiment, doctors like Alfred Tomatis were already using music to treat children with communication disorders. If something has a long history, it cannot be described as a 'relatively new practice'. |
| Q29 | NOT GIVEN | Tomatis started to look at the anatomy of sound and how it affects the brain | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that Tomatis studied how sound is built and how it acts on the brain, but it does not mention him looking into why music becomes popular. Answer Explanation: The answer is NOT GIVEN because the text does not mention whether Tomatis studied the reasons why certain types of music are popular. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because the passage explains that Tomatis focused on the 'anatomy of sound' and how it affects the 'brain' to treat health conditions. While it mentions why he chose Mozart’s music—because it has 'high-frequency sounds'—it never discusses whether he researched why some music is liked by many people (popularity). Since the information about studying popularity is missing from the text, we cannot say if the statement is true or false. |
| Q30 | FALSE | First of all, Tomatis distinguished between listening and hearing; hearing is seen as a passive process where sounds flood into our awareness, whereas listening is an active process that can be trained | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Tomatis saw a big difference between hearing and listening. He thought hearing is something that happens automatically, while listening is something you can practice and learn to do better. Answer Explanation: The answer is FALSE because the statement is not correct according to the text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the text explains that Tomatis separated the ideas of 'hearing' and 'listening.' He stated that hearing is a passive process, meaning it just happens without effort. However, he believed that listening is an active process, which is the specific skill that can be trained. Therefore, the statement that people can be trained to 'hear' contradicts his belief that only 'listening' is the active skill that can be improved. |
| Q31 | FALSE | Although other studies have not been able to replicate the original research of Tomatis and Rauscher and Shaw, the idea that music can be an aid to learning has not disappeared | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that while people still think music might help people learn, other researchers were not able to repeat the specific results found by the original scientists. Answer Explanation: The answer is FALSE because other scientific studies did not get the same results as Rauscher and Shaw when they tried to do the same experiment. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the passage states that other studies have not been able to 'replicate' the research. In science, to 'replicate' means to do a study again and get the same results to prove it is correct. Since other studies could not do this, they did not 'confirm' the findings, which makes the statement in the question wrong. |
| Q32 | TRUE | Almost immediately the children became calmer and more productive | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that right after the students started listening to Mozart, they became more relaxed (calmer) and were able to do more of their schoolwork (more productive). Answer Explanation: The answer is TRUE because the text says that the students did become more relaxed when they heard Mozart's music. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the passage describes a specific moment when Anne Savan played Mozart to her students, who were usually stressed or aggressive. After she played this music, their behavior changed for the better. The text uses the word 'calmer' to describe this change, which matches the statement in the question exactly. |
| Q33 | TRUE | They measured children's physiological signs (blood pressure, body temperature, respiration and pulse rate) when music was played at the start of a lesson, 20 minutes into the lesson and one hour after the lesson had finished in order to create a profile | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage shows that the researchers had a clear schedule for when to check the children's health signs during their lessons. Answer Explanation: The answer means that Anne Savan checked the children's physical health markers at specific, planned times during her study. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the passage explains that Savan's team recorded 'physiological signs' at set times: at the beginning of a lesson, after 20 minutes, and again after one hour. These fixed checkpoints for testing confirm that the measurements were taken at 'regular intervals' (specific times during the experiment). |
| Q34 | TRUE | In an attempt to pin down which combination of factors could be responsible for the effect, in 2001 John Hughes analysed the periodicity, or patterns, in Mozart's music. He found that Mozart's music contained a high level of repetition of patterns within 10–60 seconds of each other | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that in 2001, John Hughes studied the patterns in Mozart's music and discovered that many of these patterns repeat very often. Answer Explanation: The answer is TRUE because John Hughes studied how patterns repeat themselves in the music written by Mozart. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the text explicitly states that in 2001, John Hughes studied the 'periodicity' or 'patterns' within Mozart's music. He specifically looked for and found a 'high level of repetition of patterns'. The word 'analysed' in the text is a synonym for 'looked at' in the question, confirming that he investigated these musical repetitions. |
| Q35 | A | Almost immediately the children became calmer and more productive | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that as soon as the children started listening to the music, they felt more relaxed and were able to finish more of their schoolwork. Answer Explanation: The answer A means that listening to Mozart's music made a good difference for the people who heard it. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because the passage describes how children became peaceful and did better work when they heard Mozart's music. The words 'calmer' and 'more productive' show that the music had a 'positive effect,' which means it helped them in a good way. |
| Q36 | B | She started by playing Mozart to the children and then progressed to other music, but found that other music produced no statistically significant response | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that when the researcher switched from Mozart to different types of music, the physical reaction in the children was not strong enough to be considered a meaningful or important result. Answer Explanation: The answer B means that when students listened to music by composers other than Mozart, it had only a very small or weak effect on their bodies. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because the passage states that Anne Savan's research into 'other music' resulted in 'no statistically significant response.' In scientific research, if a result is not 'significant,' it implies that any change observed was too small or inconsistent to be certain it wasn't just by chance. This matches the description of a 'slight effect' (B), especially when contrasted with Mozart's music, which caused a clear 10 per cent drop, or changes in speed, which left the students 'unchanged' (no effect). |
| Q37 | A | Almost immediately the children became calmer and more productive only orchestral music without piano or human voice produced a response |
Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that playing Mozart's music made the children act better right away. It also specifies that this 'positive' change happened when they listened to music made by an orchestra that did not have people singing or a piano. Answer Explanation: The answer A means that playing Mozart's music with only instruments made the people listening feel better or more relaxed. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because the passage describes Anne Savan's experiment with children. When she played Mozart's music without singing (instrumental or orchestral), the children became 'calmer and more productive.' This is a 'positive effect.' The text mentions that only this specific type of music 'produced a response' from the children's bodies, such as making them less stressed. |
| Q38 | C | she sped up the music and slowed it down but the children's physiological signs stayed unchanged | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that when the researcher changed the speed of the music, the children's body signals did not move or change. Answer Explanation: The answer C means that making the music go faster or slower did not cause any changes in the people listening to it. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because the text describes how Anne Savan changed the music's speed to see if it would change the children's physical reactions. When she 'sped up' (made faster) and 'slowed it down', the children's 'physiological signs' (which are body measurements like heart rate) stayed 'unchanged'. The word 'unchanged' means there was no effect at all. |
| Q39 | B | she played the music backwards to the children but with only little effect | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that when the researcher played the music in reverse order, it did not cause a big change in the children; it only had a very small result. Answer Explanation: The answer means that playing the music in reverse (backwards) only caused a small or minor change in the children. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because the passage describes Anne Savan's experiments with music patterns. Specifically, when she played the music in reverse, she observed 'only little effect' on the children's physical signs. The word 'little' is a synonym for 'slight,' which matches the description in choice B. |
| Q40 | B | she took out the high frequencies and low frequencies in turn but had only a poor response | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that when the researcher removed specific sound levels (frequencies), the result was 'poor', meaning it did not work well and only produced a very tiny reaction from the listeners. Answer Explanation: The answer B means that taking away certain sound frequencies only caused a very small or weak change in the children. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer B is found in the section where Anne Savan changes the music to see what happens to the children. When she removed the high and low frequencies, the text says she had a 'poor response'. In this context, 'poor' means very little or not much of a reaction. This matches the idea of a 'slight effect' (a small change) rather than 'no effect' (zero change) or a 'positive effect' (a good/strong change). |
