The Mozart Effect - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From IELTS Recent Actual Test 1 Academic Reading Test 4 · Part 1 · Questions 1–13
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13 which are based on Reading Passage 1 below.
The Mozart Effect
A Music has been used for centuries to heal the body. In the Ebers Papyrus (one of the earliest medical documents, circa 1550 BC), it was recorded that physicians chanted to heal the sick (Castleman, 1994). In various cultures, we have observed singing as part of healing rituals. In the world of Western medicine, however, using music in medicine lost popularity until the introduction of the radio. Researchers then started to notice that listening to music could have significant physical effects. Therapists noticed music could help calm anxiety, and researchers saw that listening to music could cause a drop in blood pressure. In addition to these two areas, music has been used with cancer chemotherapy to reduce nausea, during surgery to reduce stress hormone production, during childbirth, and in stroke recovery (Castleman, 1994 and Westley, 1998). It has been shown to decrease pain as well as enhance the effectiveness of the immune system. In Japan, compilations of music are used as medication of sorts. For example, if you want to cure a headache or migraine, the album suggested is Mendelssohn's "Spring Song", Dvorak's “Humoresque", or part of George Gershwin's "An American in Paris" (Campbell, 1998). Music is also being used to assist in learning, in a phenomenon called the Mozart Effect.
B Frances H. Rauscher, PhD, first demonstrated the correlation between music and learning in an experiment in 1993. His experiment indicated that a 10-minute dose of Mozart could temporarily boost intelligence. Groups of students were given intelligence tests after listening to silence, relaxation tapes, or Mozart's "Sonata for Two Pianos in D Major" for a short time. He found that after silence, the average IQ score was 110, and after the relaxation tapes, the score rose a point. After listening to Mozart's music, however, the score jumped to 119 (Westley, 1998). Even students who did not like the music still had an increased score in the IQ test. Rauscher hypothesised that "listening to complex, non-repetitive music, like Mozart's, may stimulate neural pathways that are important in thinking" (Castleman, 1994).
C The same experiment was repeated on rats by Rauscher and Hong Hua Li from Stanford. Rats also demonstrated enhancement in their intelligence performance. These new studies indicate that rats that were exposed to Mozart's showed "increased gene expression of BDNF (a neural growth factor), CREB (a learning and memory compound), and Synapsin I (a synaptic growth protein)" in the brain's hippocampus, compared with rats in the control group, which heard only white noise (e.g. the whooshing sound of a radio tuned between stations).
D How exactly does the Mozart Effect work? Researchers are still trying to determine the actual mechanisms for the formation of these enhanced learning pathways. Neuroscientists suspect that music can actually help build and strengthen connections between neurons in the cerebral cortex in a process similar to what occurs in brain development despite its type. When a baby is born, certain connections have already been made – like connections for heartbeat and breathing. As new information is learned and motor skills develop, new neural connections are formed. Neurons that are not used will eventually die while those used repeatedly will form strong connections. Although a large number of these neural connections require experience, they must also occur within a certain time frame. For example, a child born with cataracts cannot develop connections within the visual cortex. If the cataracts are removed by surgery right away, the child's vision develops normally. However, after the age of 2, if the cataracts are removed, the child will remain blind because those pathways cannot establish themselves.
E Music seems to work in the same way. In October of 1997, researchers at the University of Konstanz in Germany found that music actually rewires neural circuits (Begley, 1996). Although some of these circuits are formed for physical skills needed to play an instrument, just listening to music strengthens connections used in higher-order thinking. Listening to music can then be thought of as “exercise” for the brain, improving concentration and enhancing intuition.
F If you're a little sceptical about the claims made by supporters of the Mozart Effect, you're not alone. Many people accredit the advanced learning of some children who take music lessons to other personality traits, such as motivation and persistence, which are required in all types of learning. There have also been claims of that influencing the results of some experiments.
G Furthermore, many people are critical of the role the media had in turning an isolated study into a trend for parents and music educators. After the Mozart Effect was published to the public, the sales of Mozart CDs stayed on the top of the hit list for three weeks. In an article by Michael Linton, he wrote that the research that began this phenomenon (the study by researchers at the University of California, Irvine) showed only a temporary boost in IQ, which was not significant enough to even last throughout the course of the experiment. Using music to influence intelligence was used in Confucian civilisation and Plato alluded to Pythagorean music when he described its ideal state in The Republic. In both of these examples, music did not cause any overwhelming changes, and the theory eventually died out. Linton also asks, "If Mozart's music were able to improve health, why was Mozart himself so frequently sick? If listening to Mozart's music increases intelligence and encourages spirituality, why aren't the world's smartest and most spiritual people Mozart specialists?" Linton raises an interesting point, if the Mozart Effect causes such significant changes, why isn't there more documented evidence?
H The "trendiness" of the Mozart Effect may have died out somewhat, but there are still strong supporters (and opponents) of the claims made in 1993. Since that initial experiment, there has not been a surge of supporting evidence. However, many parents, after playing classical music while pregnant or when their children are young, will swear by the Mozart Effect. A classmate of mine once told me that listening to classical music while studying will help with memorisation. If we approach this controversy from a scientific aspect, although there has been some evidence that music does increase brain activity, actual improvements in learning and memory have not been adequately demonstrated.
Questions
Questions 1–5 Matching Information
Reading Passage 1 has eight paragraphs A-H.
Which paragraph contains the following information?
Write the correct letter A-H.
Questions 6–8 Summary Completion
Complete the summary below.
Choose NO MORE THAN ONE WORD from the passage for each answer.
During the experiment conducted by Frances Rauscher, subjects were exposed to the music for a 6 period of time before they were tested. And Rauscher believes the enhancement in their performance is related to the 7 nature of Mozart's music. Later, a similar experiment was also repeated on 8.
Questions 9–13 True / False / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?
write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | D | When a baby is born, certain connections have already been made – like connections for heartbeat and breathing. As new information is learned and motor skills develop, new neural connections are formed | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that when a baby is born, their brain already has some connections for important things like breathing. As the baby learns and grows, their brain creates new connections. Answer Explanation: The answer is D. This means paragraph D describes how a baby's brain grows and changes. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is D because this paragraph explains the process of brain development in babies. It talks about how babies are born with some connections in their brain already working, and how new connections are made when they learn new things. It gives the example of a baby to show how these brain connections are formed early in life. |
| Q2 | G | After the Mozart Effect was published to the public, the sales of Mozart CDs stayed on the top of the hit list for three weeks | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that after information about the Mozart Effect was shared with people, many went out and bought Mozart's music. In fact, so many people bought it that it became the most sold music for three weeks. This shows how the public reacted to the news. Answer Explanation: The answer 'G' is correct. This means paragraph G describes how people acted when they first learned about the Mozart Effect. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is G because this paragraph talks about what happened after the study was made known to everyone. It says the media played a big role in making it a popular idea, or a 'trend'. The paragraph gives a clear example of the public's reaction by stating that when the Mozart Effect was 'published to the public', sales of Mozart CDs increased a lot and were at the 'top of the hit list' for three weeks. |
| Q3 | B | Frances H. Rauscher, PhD, first demonstrated the correlation between music and learning in an experiment in 1993. His experiment indicated that a 10-minute dose of Mozart could temporarily boost intelligence. Groups of students were given intelligence tests after listening to silence, relaxation tapes, or Mozart's "Sonata for Two Pianos in D Major" for a short time | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that a scientist named Frances H. Rauscher did his first experiment in 1993 to see how music affects learning. He gave students intelligence tests after they listened to three different things: nothing (silence), relaxing sounds, or Mozart's music. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'B'. This means that paragraph B describes Rauscher's first experiment. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because this paragraph gives details about the 'original experiment' conducted by 'Frances H. Rauscher'. It explains that in 1993, he tested students' intelligence after they listened to Mozart, silence, or relaxation tapes. This is a direct description of the experiment mentioned in the question. |
| Q4 | A | In Japan, compilations of music are used as medication of sorts. For example, if you want to cure a headache or migraine, the album suggested is Mendelssohn's "Spring Song", Dvorak's “Humoresque", or part of George Gershwin's "An American in Paris" (Campbell, 1998) | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that in the country of Japan, collections of music are used like a type of medicine. For example, if someone has a headache, specific songs are recommended to help cure it. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'A'. This means paragraph A talks about how music is used to help sick people in different countries. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'A' because this paragraph gives a specific example of music being used for healing in another country. The text mentions that in Japan, people use music albums like medicine to help with problems such as headaches. |
| Q5 | F | Many people accredit the advanced learning of some children who take music lessons to other personality traits, such as motivation and persistence, which are required in all types of learning | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that many people believe that it's not the music that makes children smart. Instead, it's other personal qualities like being motivated (wanting to learn) and persistent (not giving up). These qualities are important for all kinds of learning. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'F'. This means that paragraph F talks about other personal skills or characteristics that a person needs for any kind of learning, not just from music. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'F' because this paragraph discusses skepticism about the Mozart Effect. It suggests that good learning might not come from listening to music, but from 'other personality traits'. The paragraph specifically mentions 'motivation and persistence' as examples of qualities that are 'required in all types of learning'. This directly answers the question. |
| Q6 | short | Groups of students were given intelligence tests after listening to silence, relaxation tapes, or Mozart's "Sonata for Two Pianos in D Major" for a short time | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that some students listened to Mozart's music 'for a short time' before taking a test. This tells us that the listening period was not long. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'short'. This means the people in the experiment listened to the music for a small amount of time. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'short' because the summary asks about the length of time people listened to music in Frances Rauscher's experiment. The passage specifically describes this experiment and says the students listened to Mozart's music 'for a short time'. The word 'short' fits the blank and comes directly from the text. |
| Q7 | complex | Rauscher hypothesised that "listening to complex, non-repetitive music, like Mozart's, may stimulate neural pathways that are important in thinking" (Castleman, 1994) | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that Rauscher had an idea, called a hypothesis. His idea was that hearing music like Mozart's, which is complicated ('complex') and doesn't repeat itself a lot ('non-repetitive'), might wake up the pathways in the brain that are important for thinking. Answer Explanation: The answer means that Mozart's music is not simple. It has many different and connected parts. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'complex' because the passage states Rauscher's idea, or 'hypothesis', about why the music worked. He believed that the music's 'complex' and 'non-repetitive' quality helped to activate, or 'stimulate', the parts of the brain used for thinking. |
| Q8 | rats | The same experiment was repeated on rats by Rauscher and Hong Hua Li from Stanford | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the same study that was done before was done again, but this time with rats. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'rats', which are small animals with long tails. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'rats' because the summary mentions that a similar experiment was done again. The passage first describes an experiment with students. Then, it says that the 'same experiment was repeated on rats', which directly answers what the subjects of the later experiment were. |
| Q9 | TRUE | Neuroscientists suspect that music can actually help build and strengthen connections between neurons in the cerebral cortex in a process similar to what occurs in brain development despite its type | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that brain scientists (neuroscientists) think that music can help make the links (connections) between brain cells (neurons) stronger. It also says this happens no matter what kind of music it is ('despite its type'). Answer Explanation: The answer is TRUE. This means the statement that all types of music can help your brain work better in some way is correct based on the text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the passage explains that scientists believe music can make the connections in our brain stronger 'despite its type'. The phrase 'despite its type' means that all kinds of music can have this effect, not just one specific type like Mozart. Therefore, all music can enhance brain performance to some degree. |
| Q10 | FALSE | When a baby is born, certain connections have already been made – like connections for heartbeat and breathing | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that at birth, a baby already has some important connections in their brain. For example, the connections that control the baby's heartbeat and breathing are already working. Answer Explanation: The answer is FALSE, which means the statement 'There is no neural connection made when a baby is born' is incorrect. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the passage states the opposite. It says that when a baby is born, some important brain connections are already formed. These connections control essential functions like breathing and heartbeat. The statement in the question says there are 'no' connections, but the passage says there are 'certain connections'. |
| Q11 | FALSE | If you're a little sceptical about the claims made by supporters of the Mozart Effect, you're not alone | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that if you have some doubt ('sceptical') about the Mozart Effect, you are not the only person who feels this way ('you're not alone'). This means there are many other people who also question it. Answer Explanation: The answer 'FALSE' means that the statement is not correct. It means that many people, not just a few, question the Mozart Effect. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the passage shows that many people are doubtful or 'sceptical' about the Mozart Effect. The text states that if you have doubts, 'you're not alone,' which means many other people also have doubts. The passage also mentions 'many people' are 'critical' and that there are 'opponents' who disagree with the claims about the Mozart Effect. This is the opposite of what the question says. |
| Q12 | NOT GIVEN | In an article by Michael Linton, he wrote that the research that began this phenomenon (the study by researchers at the University of California, Irvine) showed only a temporary boost in IQ, which was not significant enough to even last throughout the course of the experiment | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that Michael Linton wrote an article about the original study on the Mozart Effect. This tells us what he wrote about, but it does not say anything about him doing his own deep research into Mozart's personal life. Answer Explanation: The answer is NOT GIVEN. This means the text does not say if Michael Linton did a lot of research about Mozart's life. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because the passage mentions an article Michael Linton wrote and some questions he asked about the Mozart Effect and Mozart's health. However, it does not provide any information about whether he conducted 'extensive research' (a lot of detailed study) on Mozart's life. The text doesn't say he did, and it doesn't say he didn't. |
| Q13 | TRUE | Since that initial experiment, there has not been a surge of supporting evidence | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that after the first study was done, there has not been a large amount of new proof or information to support the idea. Answer Explanation: The answer is TRUE. This means the statement that there is not enough proof for the Mozart Effect today is correct. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the passage states that since the first experiment in 1993, there has not been much new evidence to support the claims of the Mozart Effect. Paragraph H specifically mentions that there has not been a 'surge of supporting evidence'. The final sentence of the passage also confirms this, stating that from a 'scientific aspect', any real 'improvements in learning and memory have not been adequately demonstrated', which means they have not been proven properly. |
