The Search For The Anti-aging Pill - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From Cambridge IELTS 06 Academic Reading Test 3 · Part 3 · Questions 28–40
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 28–40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 below.
The Search for the Anti-aging Pill
In government laboratories and elsewhere, scientists are seeking a drug able to prolong life and youthful vigor. Studies of caloric restriction are showing the way
As researchers on aging noted recently, no treatment on the market today has been proved to slow human aging – the build-up of molecular and cellular damage that increases vulnerability to infirmity as we grow older. But one intervention, consumption of a low-calorie* yet nutritionally balanced diet, works incredibly well in a broad range of animals, increasing longevity and prolonging good health. Those findings suggest that caloric restriction could delay aging and increase longevity in humans, too.
Unfortunately, for maximum benefit, people would probably have to reduce their caloric intake by roughly thirty per cent, equivalent to dropping from 2,500 calories a day to 1,750. Few mortals could stick to that harsh a regimen, especially for years on end. But what if someone could create a pill that mimicked the physiological effects of eating less without actually forcing people to eat less? Could such a ‘caloric-restriction mimetic’, as we call it, enable people to stay healthy longer, postponing age-related disorders (such as diabetes, arteriosclerosis, heart disease and cancer) until very late in life? Scientists first posed this question in the mid-1990s, after researchers came upon a chemical agent that in rodents seemed to reproduce many of caloric restriction's benefits. No compound that would safely achieve the same feat in people has been found yet, but the search has been informative and has fanned hope that caloric-restriction (CR) mimetics can indeed be developed eventually.
The benefits of caloric restriction
The hunt for CR mimetics grew out of a desire to better understand caloric restriction’s many effects on the body. Scientists first recognized the value of the practice more than 60 years ago, when they found that rats fed a low-calorie diet lived longer on average than free-feeding rats and also had a reduced incidence of conditions that become increasingly common in old age. What is more, some of the treated animals survived longer than the oldest-living animals in the control group, which means that the maximum lifespan (the oldest attainable age), not merely the normal lifespan, increased. Various interventions, such as infection-fighting drugs, can increase a population's average survival time, but only approaches that slow the body's rate of aging will increase the maximum lifespan.
The rat findings have been replicated many times and extended to creatures ranging from yeast to fruit flies, worms, fish, spiders, mice and hamsters. Until fairly recently, the studies were limited to short-lived creatures genetically distant from humans. But caloric-restriction projects underway in two species more closely related to humans – rhesus and squirrel monkeys – have made scientists optimistic that CR mimetics could help people.
The monkey projects demonstrate that, compared with control animals that eat normally, caloric-restricted monkeys have lower body temperatures and levels of the pancreatic hormone insulin, and they retain more youthful levels of certain hormones that tend to fall with age.
The caloric-restricted animals also look better on indicators of risk for age-related diseases. For example, they have lower blood pressure and triglyceride levels (signifying a decreased likelihood of heart disease), and they have more normal blood glucose levels (pointing to a reduced risk for diabetes, which is marked by unusually high blood glucose levels). Further, it has recently been shown that rhesus monkeys kept on caloric-restricted diets for an extended time (nearly 15 years) have less chronic disease. They and the other monkeys must be followed still longer, however, to know whether low-calorie intake can increase both average and maximum lifespans in monkeys. Unlike the multitude of elixirs being touted as the latest anti-aging cure, CR mimetics would alter fundamental processes that underlie aging. We aim to develop compounds that fool cells into activating maintenance and repair.
How a prototype caloric-restriction mimetic works
The best-studied candidate for a caloric-restriction mimetic, 2DG (2-deoxy-D-glucose), works by interfering with the way cells process glucose. It has proved toxic at some doses in animals and so cannot be used in humans. But it has demonstrated that chemicals can replicate the effects of caloric restriction; the trick is finding the right one.
Cells use the glucose from food to generate ATP (adenosine triphosphate), the molecule that powers many activities in the body. By limiting food intake, caloric restriction minimizes the amount of glucose entering cells and decreases ATP generation. When 2DG is administered to animals that eat normally, glucose reaches cells in abundance but the drug prevents most of it from being processed and thus reduces ATP synthesis. Researchers have proposed several explanations for why interruption of glucose processing and ATP production might retard aging. One possibility relates to the ATP-making machinery’s emission of free radicals, which are thought to contribute to aging and to such age-related diseases as cancer by damaging cells. Reduced operation of the machinery should limit their production and thereby constrain the damage. Another hypothesis suggests that decreased processing of glucose could indicate to cells that food is scarce (even if it isn't) and induce them to shift into an anti-aging mode that emphasizes preservation of the organism over such ‘luxuries’ as growth and reproduction.
* calorie: a measure of the energy value of food
Questions
Questions 28–32 Yes / No / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 3?
YES if the statement agrees with the claims of the writer
NO if the statement contradicts the claims of the writer
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
Questions 33–37 Matching Features
Classify the following descriptions as relating to
A. caloric-restricted monkeys
B. control monkeys
C. neither caloric-restricted monkeys nor control monkeys
Questions 38–40 Flow Chart Completion
Complete the flow-chart below.
Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.
CR mimetic
↓
less 38 is processed
↓
production of ATP is decreased
| ↙ | ↘ |
| Theory 1:
cells less damaged by disease because fewer 39 are emitted |
Theory 2:
cells focus on 40 because food is in short supply |
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q28 | NO | As researchers on aging noted recently, no treatment on the market today has been proved to slow human aging – the build-up of molecular and cellular damage that increases vulnerability to infirmity as we grow older | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that as of now, scientists have not found any proven treatment available for sale that can slow the way human bodies age and get weaker over time. Answer Explanation: The answer NO means that the statement is false according to the passage. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NO because the author clearly states that there is currently no medicine or treatment people can buy (on the market) that is proven to slow down the process of aging. While scientists are looking for such a drug, they have not yet found one that is safe for humans. |
| Q29 | YES | Those findings suggest that caloric restriction could delay aging and increase longevity in humans, too | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that research results on animals mean that eating fewer calories might also slow down the body's aging process and help people live for a longer time. Answer Explanation: The answer YES means the author's writing agrees with the statement that research shows a low-calorie diet might help humans live longer. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the author states that studies on many different animals have shown that eating a low-calorie diet helps them live longer and stay healthy. Even though it is not 100% proven for people yet, these animal studies give scientists a reason to believe it could work for humans too. The word 'may' in the question matches words like 'suggest' and 'could' in the text, which describe a possibility based on scientific research. |
| Q30 | YES | Few mortals could stick to that harsh a regimen, especially for years on end | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that almost no one would be able to follow such a strict and difficult diet for a long time. Answer Explanation: The answer YES means that the writer agrees that most people would not like or want to follow a diet that limits their food intake significantly. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the author describes the diet as a 'harsh a regimen,' which means it is very difficult and strict. The text also states that 'few mortals' (meaning almost no one) would be able to continue this plan for many years. Because the diet is so difficult to stay on, the author implies that it is not something most people would want to do. |
| Q31 | NOT GIVEN | postponing age-related disorders (such as diabetes, arteriosclerosis, heart disease and cancer) until very late in life | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that some health problems happen more often when people get old and calls them 'age-related,' but it does not say that these problems are caused by diet. Answer Explanation: The answer is NOT GIVEN because the passage does not discuss whether the illnesses commonly found in elderly people are caused by what they eat (diet-related). Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because while the passage lists health problems like heart disease and cancer as 'age-related disorders' that happen 'late in life,' it never describes them as being 'diet-related.' The text explains that a specific diet (eating fewer calories) may help delay these diseases, but it does not claim that the diseases themselves are caused by diet or are classified as diet-related diseases. Because this specific information is missing, we cannot determine if the statement agrees with the writer. |
| Q32 | YES | Scientists first recognized the value of the practice more than 60 years ago, when they found that rats fed a low-calorie diet lived longer on average than free-feeding rats and also had a reduced incidence of conditions that become increasingly common in old age | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that researchers found that rats that were given less food lived longer lives on average than rats that were allowed to eat as much as they wanted. Answer Explanation: The answer means that in scientific tests, rats that could eat as much as they wanted died earlier than rats that were given a special diet with less food. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the text discusses past research where 'free-feeding rats' (rats that ate what they wanted) were compared to rats on a 'low-calorie diet.' Since the rats on the low-calorie diet 'lived longer,' it logically follows that the free-feeding rats had shorter lives. Pay attention to the phrase 'free-feeding,' which describes those that could eat as much as they wanted, and 'lived longer,' which provides the comparison of their lifespans. |
| Q33 | A | The caloric-restricted animals also look better on indicators of risk for age-related diseases. For example, they have lower blood pressure and triglyceride levels (signifying a decreased likelihood of heart disease), and they have more normal blood glucose levels (pointing to a reduced risk for diabetes, which is marked by unusually high blood glucose levels) | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that monkeys eating fewer calories show better health signs, specifically noting that their blood sugar levels are healthy, which means they have a lower chance of developing diabetes. Answer Explanation: The answer identifies that the monkeys on a low-calorie diet had a lower chance of getting diabetes compared to those eating a normal amount of food. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is based on research comparing two groups of monkeys. The passage states that the monkeys on a special diet (the 'caloric-restricted' group) had better blood sugar levels. Having normal blood sugar levels is a sign of a 'reduced risk for diabetes,' meaning they were less likely to get the disease. The passage uses the term 'blood glucose' as a synonym for blood sugar and links it directly to the risk of diabetes. |
| Q34 | B | Further, it has recently been shown that rhesus monkeys kept on caloric-restricted diets for an extended time (nearly 15 years) have less chronic disease | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that monkeys on a special diet with fewer calories had less long-term sickness. This tells us that the monkeys who were not on the diet—the control group—had more sickness. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'B' because it refers to the standard group of monkeys (the control group) who ate a normal amount of food and had more long-term health problems than the monkeys on the special diet. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because the passage says that monkeys on a low-calorie diet (caloric restriction) have 'less chronic disease.' In this study, the 'control' monkeys are the group being compared to the low-calorie group. If the low-calorie monkeys have less sickness, it means the control monkeys are the ones with more sickness. Paying attention to the word 'less' is key to understanding this comparison. |
| Q35 | C | They and the other monkeys must be followed still longer, however, to know whether low-calorie intake can increase both average and maximum lifespans in monkeys | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that researchers need to wait and watch both groups of monkeys for more time before they can decide if a low-calorie diet helps them live longer lives. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'C' because we do not have proof yet that either group of monkeys lives longer than the usual or average amount of time. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because the passage explains that although some monkeys on diets (caloric-restricted) are healthier and have fewer diseases, the research is not finished. Scientists need to observe the monkeys for more years to see if they actually live longer. Because there is no evidence yet for either the dieting monkeys or the monkeys eating normally (control monkeys), the description does not apply to A or B. |
| Q36 | A | The caloric-restricted animals also look better on indicators of risk for age-related diseases. For example, they have lower blood pressure and triglyceride levels (signifying a decreased likelihood of heart disease), and they have more normal blood glucose levels (pointing to a reduced risk for diabetes, which is marked by unusually high blood glucose levels) | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that monkeys that do not eat many calories are healthier. They have lower blood pressure and fewer fats in their blood, which means they have a smaller chance of getting heart disease. Answer Explanation: The answer is A, which means the group of monkeys that eat fewer calories than normal. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because the passage explains that monkeys on a low-calorie diet show fewer signs of heart disease risks. These monkeys have better blood pressure and lower amounts of a specific type of fat called triglycerides in their blood, which are both indicators that they are less likely to have heart problems compared to the 'control' monkeys who eat normally. |
| Q37 | B | The monkey projects demonstrate that, compared with control animals that eat normally, caloric-restricted monkeys have lower body temperatures and levels of the pancreatic hormone insulin, and they retain more youthful levels of certain hormones that tend to fall with age | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that monkeys eating a special low-calorie diet have less insulin than the 'control' monkeys who eat a normal amount of food. This shows that the control monkeys have a higher amount of insulin. Answer Explanation: The answer B refers to the 'control monkeys,' who are the animals in the study that ate a regular amount of food. This means these monkeys had more insulin in their bodies than the monkeys on a special diet. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because the passage says that monkeys on a low-calorie diet have lower levels of insulin when compared to control monkeys. Since the monkeys on the diet have 'lower' levels, it means the control monkeys must have 'greater' or higher levels of insulin. The key words to look for are 'compared with,' 'caloric-restricted,' and 'lower.' |
| Q38 | glucose | When 2DG is administered to animals that eat normally, glucose reaches cells in abundance but the drug prevents most of it from being processed and thus reduces ATP synthesis | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that when a caloric-restriction mimetic (the drug 2DG) is used, it stops cells from using or processing 'glucose'. As a result, the cells produce less ATP, which is the system the body uses to generate energy. Answer Explanation: The answer 'glucose' refers to a type of sugar found in the body that serves as the main source of energy for cells. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is found in the final section of the text, which explains how a prototype caloric-restriction (CR) mimetic works. The text identifies a drug called 2DG as a candidate for this pill. It describes how the drug functions by 'interfering' with the way cells use ('process') glucose. According to the passage, the drug stops glucose from being processed even when it is present, which leads to a decrease in the production of ATP (energy). This sequence directly follows the flow-chart's path: CR mimetic -> less glucose processed -> less ATP produced. |
| Q39 | free radicals | One possibility relates to the ATP-making machinery’s emission of free radicals, which are thought to contribute to aging and to such age-related diseases as cancer by damaging cells. Reduced operation of the machinery should limit their production and thereby constrain the damage | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the parts of the cell that create energy also release free radicals. These molecules are believed to hurt cells, leading to aging and sickness. If the energy-making parts work less, they make fewer free radicals, which stops the cells from being damaged as much. Answer Explanation: The answer "free radicals" refers to tiny, harmful molecules produced by cells that can damage parts of the body and cause aging or disease. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is supported by the passage's explanation of 'Theory 1' in the flow-chart. The text describes how the production of energy (ATP) produces certain substances as a side effect. It explicitly links the 'emission' (the sending out or release) of these 'free radicals' to cell damage and disease. Therefore, if the process of making energy is slowed down, 'fewer' of these molecules are released, which protects the cells. |
| Q40 | preservation | Another hypothesis suggests that decreased processing of glucose could indicate to cells that food is scarce (even if it isn't) and induce them to shift into an anti-aging mode that emphasizes preservation of the organism over such ‘luxuries’ as growth and reproduction | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that when cells believe there is very little food, they switch to a special mode. In this mode, they care more about keeping the body safe and healthy than about things like growing or having babies. Answer Explanation: The answer means the act of staying alive or keeping the body in a good and healthy state. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is preservation because the passage describes a theory where cells react to a lack of food. When cells think food is limited (or 'scarce'), they change their behavior to prioritize staying alive over other activities like growing. The text mention that they shift into a mode that 'emphasizes preservation,' which matches the idea in the flowchart of cells 'focusing on' keeping the organism alive. |
