WIND POWER – A TURN FOR THE BETTER - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From Cambridge IELTS 20 General Training Reading Test 3 · Part 3 · Questions 28–40
Reading Passage
Read the text and answer Questions 28-40.
WIND POWER – A TURN FOR THE BETTER
In an effort to find alternative sources of energy, some governments have turned to wind power as a possible solution. However, this has proved controversial, as Steve Rose reports
A Think of wind power and the first image to spring to mind is most likely a giant, three-bladed propeller spinning atop a slim tower, probably in a rural area. Chances are that's actually the only image that springs to mind - and that's the problem.
B To renewable-energy supporters, wind turbines symbolise the hope of a green, clean future, but to opponents, they might as well be invaders from outer space. In the UK, with plans for new wind farms proceeding apace in an effort to meet the government's interim target for renewable-sourced energy, the debate has reached crisis point. Anti-wind farm groups have been springing up wherever wind farms are proposed; some opponents say they would rather have a nuclear power station in their backyard than see the rural landscape covered in propellers on sticks. And as long as propellers on sticks are the only option, pro- and anti-wind farm camps are unlikely ever to agree. The debate is clearly as much about the aesthetics of wind power as the politics and practicalities but, at present, wind turbines barely rank above electricity pylons in terms of aesthetic consideration. Members of the design community are, however, rising to the challenge.
C One of the most striking projects rethinks the idea of the turbine entirely. It is called an Aerogenerator and it looks nothing like a propeller on a stick. The Aerogenerator, designed by Grimshaw Architects, is arguably the first wind turbine design to capture the spirit of pioneering optimism that these structures sought to express. It could also be a very practical option, especially since it would be situated offshore, far away from anyone's backyard. While conventional turbines rotate on a horizontal axis, the tall, V-shaped Aerogenerator spins on a vertical axis, like a record. Unlike horizontal-axis designs, vertical-axis turbines can harness wind energy from any direction, and because the moving parts and the generator are at ground level, they are easier to maintain.
D 'Our engineer thought about the problems with traditional turbines and developed a new design,' says Theo Bird, founder of Windpower Ltd., who is funding this new Aerogenerator project through a combination of a government grant and the money he was saving to buy a new house. 'By making our turbine so large, we can build offshore, where there's more wind. It's got to be something strong and simple to work at sea. And in the future, you could possibly double the power from each turbine by harnessing tidal power beneath the surface of the sea.' 'Also,' adds Bird, 'we saw it as a striking landmark that could enhance the entrance of a harbour or an industrial port.'
E Beyond making more attractive wind farms, there is also potential for integrating turbines directly into buildings. After all, if nobody wants wind turbines in the countryside, why not put them in the cities? Cities already have high-rise structures in which to incorporate turbines that would be in tune with a man-made environment. Added to this, there would be less need to transport the electricity large distances to its users.
F It took a long time for architects to successfully incorporate effective wind turbines into buildings. The architect Richard Rogers proposed an integral turbine for the Tomigaya Tower in Tokyo in 1993, but his plan was turned down. In more recent efforts, such as William Pedersen's sports centre in New York, wind turbines seem to be environmentally friendly but do not provide a real solution to energy requirements.
G Going a step further, several years ago a European Commission-sponsored organisation named Project WEB (Wind Energy for the Built Environment) investigated in detail the possibility of constructing a purpose-built wind-powered skyscraper. According to Project WEB's environmental engineer, Sinisa Stankovic, under the right circumstances such a building could generate nearly all of its own energy needs. Yet despite the proven effectiveness of Project WEB's designs (which also included a four-tower design that could harness wind from any direction), the realities of the construction industry kept them on the drawing board.
H A project that came closer to realisation was the controversial Freedom Tower in New York. At the top of this enormous tower, architects intended to create a 150 m-high open cage structure containing a wind turbine. The skyscraper beneath it was shaped to channel the wind up into it, and it could have generated a quarter of the building's needs – a genuine urban wind farm. Despite this design receiving widespread approval, other factors came to take precedence over environmental considerations. So instead of a powerful advertisement for wind power's potential to the world, the Freedom Tower became a rather ordinary office block. Guy Battle, a much respected expert in the field of environmental and sustainable architecture, was consulting engineer for the project.
I As energy from fossil fuels becomes more scarce and expensive, the energy performance of buildings can only increase in importance. 'Traditional buildings have been a drain on infrastructure - water, electricity, waste disposal, etc.' says Battle. 'It's no longer about just responding to cultural and social urban factors. It's a whole different layer of architecture coming through that will begin to change the face of our cities.'
Questions
Questions 28–34 Matching Information
The text has nine paragraphs, A–I.
Which paragraph mentions the following?
Write the correct letter, A–I.
Questions 35–40 Matching Features
Look at the following projects and the list of people below.
Match each project with the correct person, A–E.
Write the correct letter, A-E.
NB You may use any letter more than once.
A. Theo Bird
B. Richard Rogers
C. William Pedersen
D. Sinisa Stankovic
E. Guy Battle
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q28 | C | While conventional turbines rotate on a horizontal axis, the tall, V-shaped Aerogenerator spins on a vertical axis, like a record. Unlike horizontal-axis designs, vertical-axis turbines can harness wind energy from any direction, and because the moving parts and the generator are at ground level, they are easier to maintain | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that old wind machines (conventional turbines) turn on a flat line (horizontal axis). But the new Aerogenerator turns on an upright line (vertical axis), like a music disk. It also says that machines that spin upright (vertical-axis turbines) can catch wind from all sides, and they are simpler to fix because their moving parts are near the ground. This shows a clear comparison between the old and new designs. Answer Explanation: The answer is paragraph C. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because this section of the text talks about a new and different wind turbine design called an 'Aerogenerator'. It then directly compares it to older, 'conventional turbines' and 'horizontal-axis designs' by explaining how their parts move differently. For example, it mentions that conventional turbines spin sideways, but the new Aerogenerator spins up and down. |
| Q29 | F | The architect Richard Rogers proposed an integral turbine for the Tomigaya Tower in Tokyo in 1993, but his plan was turned down. In more recent efforts, such as William Pedersen's sports centre in New York, wind turbines seem to be environmentally friendly but do not provide a real solution to energy requirements | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that an architect named Richard Rogers wanted to put a wind turbine in a building in Tokyo, but his idea was 'turned down' (not allowed). It also says that in another building, a sports centre by William Pedersen, the wind turbines didn't really 'provide a real solution' (help much) with the energy needed. This clearly shows two tries that didn't work well. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'F'. This paragraph talks about two times when architects tried to put wind turbines into buildings, but they didn't work out well. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is F because this paragraph describes two particular situations where wind turbines were planned for buildings but faced problems or didn't meet expectations. It mentions Richard Rogers' plan for the Tomigaya Tower that 'was turned down,' meaning it wasn't accepted. It also talks about William Pedersen's sports centre, where the turbines 'do not provide a real solution to energy requirements,' indicating they weren't effective enough. These two examples fit the description of 'two unsatisfactory attempts' to include wind turbines in buildings. |
| Q30 | B | In the UK, with plans for new wind farms proceeding apace in an effort to meet the government's interim target for renewable-sourced energy, the debate has reached crisis point | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that in the UK, new wind farm projects are moving forward quickly because the government has a short-term goal for getting energy from clean sources. This government goal shows an official rule or plan about how energy should be made. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'B'. This means that paragraph B in the text talks about a government's plan for making energy. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because this paragraph directly mentions a government's goal for energy. It talks about the UK government's 'interim target for renewable-sourced energy,' which means an official plan or policy for how much clean energy they want to make. This goal is an example of an 'official policy relating to energy production'. |
| Q31 | H | A project that came closer to realisation was the controversial Freedom Tower in New York. At the top of this enormous tower, architects intended to create a 150 m-high open cage structure containing a wind turbine. The skyscraper beneath it was shaped to channel the wind up into it, and it could have generated a quarter of the building's needs – a genuine urban wind farm. Despite this design receiving widespread approval, other factors came to take precedence over environmental considerations. So instead of a powerful advertisement for wind power's potential to the world, the Freedom Tower became a rather ordinary office block | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage talks about the Freedom Tower in New York. Architects wanted to put a wind turbine at the top of this very big building to make some of its energy. Many people liked this idea, but because of other reasons, they did not use this special design. Instead, the building became just a normal office building. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'H'. This paragraph talks about an important building called the Freedom Tower and how its special plan was changed for the worse. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is H because this paragraph discusses the Freedom Tower, an 'enormous tower' which was planned to be an 'innovative corporate building' with a wind turbine. However, the plans were changed. The paragraph states that 'other factors came to take precedence over environmental considerations' causing it to become 'a rather ordinary office block' instead of serving as a 'powerful advertisement for wind power's potential'. This change from an innovative design to an ordinary one is a 'disappointing modification'. |
| Q32 | I | It's a whole different layer of architecture coming through that will begin to change the face of our cities. | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that new kinds of building designs will start to make our cities look different than they do now. This means cities will change how they appear because of these new buildings. Answer Explanation: The answer is paragraph I. This paragraph talks about how new building designs will change how cities look. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is paragraph I because it contains a statement that directly says new architectural ideas will change how cities appear. The expert, Guy Battle, mentions a 'different layer of architecture' that will 'change the face of our cities', meaning the design of buildings will have a big effect on the look of urban areas. This matches the idea of changes in building design impacting the way urban areas look. |
| Q33 | E | Beyond making more attractive wind farms, there is also potential for integrating turbines directly into buildings. After all, if nobody wants wind turbines in the countryside, why not put them in the cities? Cities already have high-rise structures in which to incorporate turbines that would be in tune with a man-made environment. Added to this, there would be less need to transport the electricity large distances to its users | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that instead of making wind farms look nicer, we could put the spinning wind machines right inside buildings. It asks why we don't put them in big cities if people don't want them in the countryside. The passage explains that cities have tall buildings where these machines could fit, and they would look good in a city setting. Also, it would be easier to get the electricity to the people who need it. Answer Explanation: The answer is E. This part of the text talks about putting wind turbines in cities. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is E because this paragraph suggests using 'wind farms in urban areas' (cities) as a way to fix the 'problem of appearance' (people not liking how wind turbines look in the countryside). The paragraph directly asks, 'if nobody wants wind turbines in the countryside, why not put them in the cities?' This shows that putting them in cities is seen as a solution to the visual issue in rural areas. |
| Q34 | D | 'Our engineer thought about the problems with traditional turbines and developed a new design,' says Theo Bird, founder of Windpower Ltd., who is funding this new Aerogenerator project through a combination of a government grant and the money he was saving to buy a new house. 'By making our turbine so large, we can build offshore, where there's more wind. It's got to be something strong and simple to work at sea. And in the future, you could possibly double the power from each turbine by harnessing tidal power beneath the surface of the sea.' | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Theo Bird, who owns a company called Windpower Ltd., is paying for the new Aerogenerator project. He is using money given by the government and his own savings, which he had put aside to buy a new home. This new big turbine can be built in the sea, where there is more wind. Answer Explanation: The answer is D. This part of the text talks about where the money came from for a new type of wind turbine that will be placed in the sea. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is D because this paragraph explains how the new 'Aerogenerator' project, which is designed for offshore use, is getting its money. It clearly states the 'source of finance' for this 'new turbine' and its 'offshore project'. The passage mentions both a 'government grant' and personal savings as funding sources. |
| Q35 | E | A project that came closer to realisation was the controversial Freedom Tower in New York. At the top of this enormous tower, architects intended to create a 150 m-high open cage structure containing a wind turbine. The skyscraper beneath it was shaped to channel the wind up into it, and it could have generated a quarter of the building's needs – a genuine urban wind farm. Despite this design receiving widespread approval, other factors came to take precedence over environmental considerations. So instead of a powerful advertisement for wind power's potential to the world, the Freedom Tower became a rather ordinary office block. Guy Battle, a much respected expert in the field of environmental and sustainable architecture, was consulting engineer for the project | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the Freedom Tower in New York had a big, special idea to put a wind turbine on top. This design was very popular. But later, other things became more important, and the building ended up being a regular office building instead of the amazing wind-powered one. Guy Battle was an engineer who worked on this project. Answer Explanation: The answer is E, which means Guy Battle. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is Guy Battle because the passage talks about the Freedom Tower in New York. This building had a very big and creative plan to include a wind turbine at the top, which was an 'ambitious design'. However, the final building did not include this special design and became an 'ordinary office block'. Guy Battle was involved in this project as a 'consulting engineer'. The passage directly links the ambitious design of the Freedom Tower, its transformation into an 'ordinary office block', and Guy Battle's role in it. |
| Q36 | A | 'Our engineer thought about the problems with traditional turbines and developed a new design,' says Theo Bird, founder of Windpower Ltd., who is funding this new Aerogenerator project through a combination of a government grant and the money he was saving to buy a new house | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that Theo Bird, who started Windpower Ltd., is paying for the new Aerogenerator project. He is using money from the government and also money he was keeping to buy a house. This means he used some of his own money for the project. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'A', which means Theo Bird is the person linked to a project that got some money from his own savings. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is Theo Bird because the passage states that he funded the new Aerogenerator project using two sources: a government grant and 'the money he was saving to buy a new house'. The phrase 'money he was saving to buy a new house' directly shows that a part of his personal wealth or savings was used to finance the project, making it 'partially financed by personal wealth'. |
| Q37 | C | In more recent efforts, such as William Pedersen's sports centre in New York, wind turbines seem to be environmentally friendly but do not provide a real solution to energy requirements | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that William Pedersen created a 'sports centre' in New York. A 'sports centre' is a place where people go to play sports or do other fun activities in their free time. Answer Explanation: The answer is C, which refers to William Pedersen. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because the passage talks about 'William Pedersen's sports centre'. A 'sports centre' is a building where people do activities for fun and exercise, which means it is 'designed for leisure activities'. The keyword 'sports centre' directly links to 'leisure activities'. |
| Q38 | D | According to Project WEB's environmental engineer, Sinisa Stankovic, under the right circumstances such a building could generate nearly all of its own energy needs | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that Sinisa Stankovic, who worked as an engineer for a group called Project WEB, thought that if conditions were right, a building designed by them could make almost all the electricity it needed to power itself. Answer Explanation: The answer is D. This means Sinisa Stankovic is the person connected to the idea of a building that can make almost all the energy it needs by itself. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is Sinisa Stankovic (D) because the passage states that he, as Project WEB's environmental engineer, believed their special wind-powered skyscrapers could produce 'nearly all of its own energy needs'. The phrase 'virtually all' in the question means almost the same as 'nearly all', directly matching the description of Project WEB's design attributed to Sinisa Stankovic. |
| Q39 | D | several years ago a European Commission-sponsored organisation named Project WEB (Wind Energy for the Built Environment) investigated in detail the possibility of constructing a purpose-built wind-powered skyscraper. According to Project WEB's environmental engineer, Sinisa Stankovic, under the right circumstances such a building could generate nearly all of its own energy needs | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that an organization called Project WEB was sponsored by the 'European Commission'. This means many countries in Europe helped to fund or support this project. Sinisa Stankovic was the engineer for this project, looking at how buildings could make their own energy. Answer Explanation: The answer is D. This means the person named Sinisa Stankovic was involved in a project that a group of countries helped to pay for. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is D because the passage talks about 'Project WEB', which was a project sponsored by the 'European Commission'. The European Commission represents many European countries working together. Sinisa Stankovic is mentioned as Project WEB's environmental engineer, connecting him to this project supported by a group of countries. |
| Q40 | A | 'By making our turbine so large, we can build offshore, where there's more wind. It's got to be something strong and simple to work at sea. And in the future, you could possibly double the power from each turbine by harnessing tidal power beneath the surface of the sea.' | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that their large wind turbine can be placed in the sea where there's a lot of wind. It also says that in the future, this turbine could make twice as much power by catching the energy from ocean tides under the water, in addition to using wind. This means it can use both wind and tidal energy. Answer Explanation: The answer is A. This means Theo Bird is the person linked to a structure that might use more than one kind of natural energy. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is Theo Bird because the passage states that the Aerogenerator, a project he funds, could not only use wind power but also 'harness tidal power beneath the surface of the sea' in the future. This clearly shows the potential for utilizing more than one natural energy source, which are wind and tidal power. |
