Multiple Graphs

Band 7+: Compare the different levels of energy production between 1995 and 2005.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: Compare the different levels of energy production between 1995 and 2005.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image depicts two pie charts comparing energy production in 1995 and 2005. In 1995, coal constituted 29.80%, gas 29.63%, petro 29.27%, nuclear 6.40%, and other sources 4.90%. In 2005, coal rose to 30.93%, gas to 30.31%, petro fell to 19.55%, nuclear increased to 10.10%, and other sources to 9.10%.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The two pie charts clearly illustrate the different percentages of energy production from 1995 to 2005.

Overall, it can be seen that coal produced the highest energy amount, while other contributed the lowest energy consumption in both years.

Looking at the details, at the beginning of the period, coal’s accounted for 29.8% of energy. Then, it rose to 30.93% in 2005. Moreover, gas made up 29.63% of energy level in 1995. However, it slightly increased to 30.31% in 2005. Furthermore, nuclear’s energy amount was 6.40% in 1995. After that, it dramatically escalated to 10.10% in 2005.

In detail, other sources stood at 4.90% in 1995. Nevertheless, they grew to 9.10% in 2005. In contrast, at the beginning of the period, petro’s energy production represented 29.27% of energy. Although, it declined slowly to 19.55% in 2005.

Word Count: 135

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
B1 - Intermediate
Using more sophisticated words could be beneficial.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

energy: 8

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report effectively addresses the task by comparing energy production levels between 1995 and 2005. The overview is clear, and the details are well-organized, covering the main trends and changes in each energy source. To improve, consider using more varied language to describe changes (e.g., instead of always saying 'increased' or 'decreased,' use synonyms like 'grew,' 'expanded,' 'shrank,' or 'diminished'). Also, ensure that all percentage changes are accurately reflected and avoid minor inaccuracies. The report falls short of the required 150 words.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report is generally well-organized with a clear structure, including an overview and detailed paragraphs. However, transitions between sentences and ideas could be smoother to enhance the flow. For example, in the third paragraph, the transition between discussing gas and nuclear energy could be improved. Consider using more varied cohesive devices to avoid repetition and improve the overall readability.

Lexical Resource

The report demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to describe the data. However, there's room to enhance the sophistication of word choice. For instance, instead of repeatedly using 'energy amount' or 'energy level,' consider using synonyms like 'energy output,' 'energy contribution,' or 'energy share.' Also, explore more precise adjectives and adverbs to describe the changes, such as 'marginally increased' instead of 'slightly increased' or 'significantly escalated' instead of 'dramatically escalated.' Boost vocabulary complexity to elevate the overall score.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report generally demonstrates good grammatical control, but there are a few errors that need attention. For example, 'coal's accounted for' should be 'coal accounted for' or 'coal's production accounted for.' Also, ensure correct subject-verb agreement and consistent tense usage throughout the report. Pay close attention to punctuation, especially apostrophes and commas, to avoid errors.

Answers On The Same Topic:

Compare the different levels of energy production between 1995 and 2005.

The pie charts ilustrate the percentage of energy production from five energy types in 1995 and 2005. In 1995, Coal enagy production is the most percentage of energy production at 29.80%. las and petro aren with a small abe difference at 29.63% and 29.27 respectively while Nuclear enery is stayed in 6.40%, percentage sources 4.90% […]

Band 4+

Compare the different levels of energy production between 1995 and 2005.

The two pie charts illustrate the percentage of energy production from five different sources in 1995 and 2005. In 1995, coal accounted for the largest portion of energy production at 29.80%, closely followed by gas and petroleum, which were 29.63% and 29.27%, respectively. Conversely, nuclear energy contributed a relatively small proportion, at 6.40%, while other […]

Band 8+

Compare the different levels of energy production between 1995 and 2005.

The two pie charts present a comparative analysis of energy production sources in the years 1995 and 2005, expressed in percentage terms. Overall, while coal, gas, and petroleum remained the primary energy sources across both years, coal emerged as the most significant contributor by 2005, highlighting a shift in energy reliance. In 1995, coal constituted […]

Band 9

Compare the different levels of energy production between 1995 and 2005.

The pie charts provide information about the comparison of five several kinds of energy production of France in 1995 and 2005, over a period of 10 years. Overall, it can be seen that coal and remained the highest sources of energy production in both years, while the use of nuclear and other stayed the lowest […]

Band 7+

See All

Graph charts show various activities in a US office in 1980 , 2000

The bar chart illustrate that the amount of time spent on different types of task in the US office between 1980 and 2000. Overall, it is evident that, the maximum time spent on phone. There was least time spent on meeting over the periods. The amount of time was 30% phone in 1980, which decreased […]

Band 5+

The table and chart give information about the number of patients

The table and charts show information about the doctors between 1986 and 2006 in Australia. Overall, number of doctors in Australia showed upward trend, starting from 1986 to 2006.Although male doctors remained the dominant majority group, female doctors’ proportion increased steadily. Additionally, in 1986 and 1996 Australian-born trend was preeminent. However, in the final year […]

Band 5+

The charts below show Australian dollars in Australia's trade in 3 nations from 2004 to 2009

The charts illustrate the information about Australian dollars in Australian trade in three countries (China, India, and the USA). The statistics are given in billion dollars and cover the periods between 2004 and 2009. Overall, throughout the span, the import rates of Australia’s dollar trade in three nations rose. However, when it comes to export […]

Band 6+

The given charts give information about the number of students at university in the UK from 1991 to 2001, government spending and the types of family economic background they came from in 1991.

The given pie chart shows the percentage of students who came from 3 types of family economic background in 1991, while the bar chart illustrates the sum of students at university in the UK between 1991 and 2001. The last chart show the goverment spending on each student from 1991 to 2001. Overall, it can […]

Band 6+

The charts show the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school.

The pie charts illustrate what Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school from 1980 to 2000. Overall, there were a large number of students who chose to be employed or pursue further education, while the percentage of students who were unemployed was the smallest throughout the period. In 1980, the percentage of Australians […]

Band 8+

The pie charts compares the average spending patterns of two countries in the year 2010.

The pie charts illustrate a significant difference in the allocation of expenditure among Japanese and Malaysian households in the year 2010. Overall, the financial distribution of household budget varied considerably between two nations with Japanese population spending more on other goods and services, while Malaysians were prone to expense on housing. Of particular note is […]

Band 7+

See All

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium