Bar Chart

Band 6+: The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image shows a bar graph of stock prices for four technology companies from 2011 to 2016. In 2011, the prices for Facebook, Google, Apple, and Yahoo were approximately 7000, 500, 4000, and 7200 respectively. For 2012, the values were 10000, 500, 33000, and 6000. In 2013, the prices were 12500, 500, 6000, and 5000. The 2014 stock prices were 15000 for Facebook, 500 for Google, 11500 for Apple, and 3000 for Yahoo. In 2015, the corresponding values were 17500, 500, 2500, and 2800. Finally, in 2016, the stock prices were 19500 for Facebook, 500 for Google, 5000 for Apple, and 2000 for Yahoo.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The bar chart below illustrates the difference in stock price of four tech giants from 2011 to 2016, which are Facebook, Google, Apple, and Yahoo.

To summarize, Google being consistently low across the entire chart in stock prices compared to its rivals, while Facebook prices of stock steadily rises without any decline.

Google is at the bottom consistently without any sign of increase throughout the 2011 to 2016 period. In 2011, Google stock prices was just above 0 and this carried on for the next 5 years without any change and this trend finally stopped with their figure staying the same in the end.

On the other hand, Facebook stock prices steadily rise to the top in 2016. Starting at about 5,500 in 2011, the number quickly climbed up to just over 10,000 the next year. However, this figure continued to go up from 10,000 in 2012 to about 17,000 in 2015, undoubtedly the highest of all 4 companies, this finally ends with them being at the top with almost 20,000 in stock prices, almost 4 times higher than second place.

Word Count: 181

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
B1 - Intermediate
Using more sophisticated words could be beneficial.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

stock: 6

prices: 5

facebook: 3

google: 3

without: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report covers the main features of the graph, highlighting the consistent low stock price of Google and the steady rise of Facebook. Comparisons are made between the companies. However, there are some inaccuracies in the data (e.g., Facebook's 2011 price is given as 5,500 instead of 7,000, and Apple and Yahoo are not discussed in detail). The report could be improved by including more specific data points and a more balanced overview of all four companies. Additionally, the language could be more precise and varied.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report has a clear overall structure with an introduction and separate paragraphs for Google and Facebook. However, the flow is somewhat disrupted by the lack of a clear overview paragraph that effectively summarizes the main trends. The second paragraph attempts to provide an overview but is grammatically flawed and does not present a complete summary. The report would benefit from a more logical progression, perhaps by grouping companies with similar trends or by year. Additionally, the use of cohesive devices is limited, and some sentences feel disconnected. To improve, ensure each paragraph has a clear central topic and use a wider range of linking words and phrases to guide the reader smoothly through the data.

Lexical Resource

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, with some attempts at variation (e.g., 'steadily rises', 'climbed up', 'at the bottom'). However, the range is limited, and there is noticeable repetition of phrases like 'stock prices' and 'figure'. The language is not always precise or natural (e.g., 'Google being consistently low', 'this carried on'). To improve, incorporate a wider range of synonyms and more sophisticated vocabulary related to trends (e.g., 'plateaued', 'fluctuated', 'peaked', 'remained stable'). Also, avoid informal phrasing and ensure word choices accurately describe the data. Boost vocabulary complexity to elevate the overall score.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report demonstrates some variety in sentence structures, but there are several grammatical errors and awkward phrasings that affect clarity. Examples include subject-verb agreement errors ('Google stock prices was'), incorrect verb forms ('Google being consistently low'), and run-on sentences. Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma usage. To improve, focus on mastering basic grammar rules, such as subject-verb agreement and correct tense usage. Practice using a mix of simple, compound, and complex sentences accurately. Proofreading for common errors would significantly enhance the grammatical accuracy of the report.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar graph illustrates the stock price for four technology firms (Facebook, Google, Apple, Yahoo) between 2011 and 2016. Overall, the value of Facebook increased significantly, while the Yahoo fell constantly. Google remained steady throughout the period, and Apple was very unpredictable. In 2011, Facebook and Yahoo started at the same level at around 7,500. […]

Band 6+

The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar graph compares the stock values of Facebook, Google, Apple, and Yahoo between 2011 and 2016. Overall, Facebook’s stock value showed an upward trend, while Yahoo experienced a downward trend. In addition, Apple’s stock value fluctuated throughout the period, with a dramatic peak in 2012, whereas Google recorded the lowest stock value over the […]

Band 8+

The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The illustration presents the stock cost of Facebook, Google, Apple, and Yahoo between 2011 and 2016. Overall, the numbers for Facebook increased steadily, whilst that of Yahoo increased. Apple company experienced dramatic fluctuations. Google stocks remained stable. In 2011, Facebook and Yahoo started off at approximately the same price at around 5500. Both companies exhibited […]

Band 6+

The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar graph illustrates the stock value of four different software companies,over a time period of five years . overall,Apple shows the highest value of stock price in the starting second year in which it rises dramatically as well as, after having some fluctuation the facebook company started to rises in the upward direction but […]

Band 4+

See All

The graph shows the number of students enrolled on different course types in China.

The given chart illustrates the number of people taking four different courses, such as online learning, literacy courses, as well as postgraduate and undergraduate programs in China between 2008 and 2012.Overall, the vast majority of courses saw an upward trend, with the exception of literacy courses. In addition, there was a significant gap in the […]

Band 7+

The chart shows the percentage of drugs taken by girls and boys in a school in New Zealand.

The bar chart illustrates the percentage of girls and boys who take seven different types of drugs in a school in New Zealand. Overall, hashish or marijuana is by far the most commonly used drug among both genders, while LSD and recreational use of medical drugs are among the least common. In most categories, boys […]

Band 8+

The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002, 2006 and 2010.

The bar chart illustrates the proportion of the population in the UK who met the recommended daily intake of fruits and vegetables in three specific years: 2002, 2006, and 2010. Overall, a higher proportion of women achieved the daily requirements regarding healthy food intake, while children showed the lowest preference for fruits and vegetables throughout […]

Band 8+

The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002, 2006 and 2010.

The bar chart compares three different means of population, the percentages of men, women and children in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruits and vegetables in 2002,2006 and 2010. It is clear from the graph that women had the highest figures in all three years, whereas the children had the lowest […]

Band 7+

The bar charts below show the percentage of men and women in employment in three countries in 2005 and 2016

The bar graphs compare the employment rates of men and women across three different countries in 2005 and 2015. Firstly, the proportion of employed men witnessed various trends from each nation. To begin with, approximately 60 percent was the initial percentage of men who worked in Canada in 2005, before rising to just above 70 […]

Band 7+

The bar chart shows the percentage of students in Country X who participated in football, basketball, tennis, and swimming in 2010 and 2020.

The provided bar chart delineates the proportions of students in Country X engaging in four distinct sports – football, basketball, tennis, and swimming – across the years 2010 and 2020. It is evident that football, despite its dominant position in 2010, experienced a notable decline by 2020. Conversely, tennis and swimming witnessed upward trends, while […]

Band 9

See All

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium