🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Bar Chart

Band 6+: The bar graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members in different faculties of a particular university in

Image for topic: The bar graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members in different faculties of a particular university in
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image shows a bar chart representing the percentage of academic staff by gender in different fields in 2008. In Arts, female staff constitute 70% and male staff 30%. In Astronomy, female staff make up 10% and male staff 90%. In History, female staff are 60% and male staff 40%. In Engineering, female staff are 20% and male staff 80%. In Law, female staff are 50% and male staff are also 50%. In Medicine, female staff are 40% and male staff 60%. In Science, female staff account for 30% and male staff 70%. The chart's X-axis lists the fields, and the Y-axis shows the percentage from 0% to 100%.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The given bar graph depicts the number of male and female faculty in the year 2008. The data has been calibrated in percentage.

Taking a general overview, it can be clearly seen that more academic male staff was in engineering, whereas the proportion of females in history was the highest as compared to other fields.

In 2008, maximum number of men (90%) were employed in engineering, whilst for women, the proportion was at bottom with only 8%. The percentage of both the genders was similar in medicine at nearly a half.

In terms of working in fields like science, law and astronomy, around 68%, 60% and 64% males were interested, but this ratio was approximately 30%, 40% and 55% for females respectively. There was a difference of about 10% in the percentile of men (45%) and women (55%) in arts. History was the only field where more female staff was employed (70%) than that of males (nearly 30%).

Word Count: 158

Answers On The Same Topic:

The bar graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members in different faculties of a particular university in

The bar chart illustrates the percentages of male and female academic staff in seven university subjects in 2008. Overall, it is clear that men dominated in science-related fields, particularly engineering, whereas women were more prevalent in arts and history. The most significant gender gap is seen in engineering. According to the chart, males accounted for […]

The bar graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members in different faculties of a particular university in

Word Count: 217 Polished Report The bar chart shows the gender composition of staff in one particular institution in 2008. Overall, males mostly dominated in science subjects, while females took the lead in social subjects. Notably, the gender gap was most pronounced in engineering and history, where either males or females outnumbered one another by […]

The bar graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members in different faculties of a particular university in

The bar chart illustrates the proportion of male and female academic staff members who chose different subjects, including Arts, Astronomy, History, Engineering, Law, Medicine, and Science. At first glance, it is evident that Engineering was the most preferred subject among males, while it was the least chosen by females. Conversely, females dominated in Arts and […]

The bar graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members in different faculties of a particular university in

The bar chart shows the gender composition of staff in one particular institution in 2008. Overall, males mostly dominated in science subjects, while females took the lead in social subjects. Notably, the gender gap was most pronounced in engineering and history, where either males or females outnumbered one another by a significant margin, respectively. Men […]

The bar graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members in different faculties of a particular university in

The bar graph illustrates the distribution of male and female academic staff members across various faculties at a specific university in 2008. Overall, the data reveals significant gender disparities among academic staff in different disciplines, with varying proportions of male and female faculty members. In the Arts faculty, a pronounced majority of 70% of the […]

See All

Other Topics:

the bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 European countries in 3 years and compares with the European average.

The chart illustrates the number of car owners per 1,000 people in five European countries in 2005, 2009 and 2015, compared with the European average. Overall, Countries 1 and 2 had lower levels of car ownership than the European average throughout the period, whereas the remaining countries recorded higher figures. In addition, Country 5 consistently […]

the bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 European countries in 3 years and compares with the European average.

The data gives information about the figure of car owners per 1000 people in European nations in 3 several years: 2005,2009 and 2015 and compares with European avarage. Overall, while the number of cars per 1000 people showed smaller numbers in Country 1 and Country 2 where are compared with avarage, the reverse was true […]

The charts below show the percentages of male and female students getting top grades in 1960 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The below chart presents information about the proportion of famele and male students getting top grades of various subjects over the period from 1960 and 2000. Overall, humanities showed the largest percentage for male while, art peresent the lowest proportion. Moreover, languages illustrated the higher proportion for famele. However, science had the lowest proportion. First […]

The chart below shows the percentage of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002

The line chart provides information regarding the proportions of four distinct types of recycled household waste in a particular city from 1992 to 2002. Overall, it is evident that with the exception of plastic, the other three types: paper, glass, and cans were recorded at nearly similar figures initially. However, glass was the most prevalent […]

The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line chart provides information regarding the proportions of four distinct recycled household waste in a particular city from 1992 to 2002. Overall, it is evident that with the exception of plastic, the other three types: paper, glass, and cans, were recorded at nearly similar figures initially. However, glass was the most prevalent type of […]

The chart below details the waste disposal in one European country between 2005 and 2008.

The bar chart provides information about the waste disposal (landfill, burning, and dumping at sea) in one European country between 2005 and 2008. Overall, the amount of landfill had the highest figure from 2005 to 2007, and decreased over the given period. In contrast, burning had the lowest amount from 2005 to 2006, but, showed […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.