🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Line Graph

Band 8+: The chart below shows the levels of air pollution in three major cities (City A, City B, and City C) from 2010 to 2020. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Image for topic: The chart below shows the levels of air pollution in three major cities (City A, City B, and City C) from 2010 to 2020. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image shows air pollution levels for 2010-2020 in three cities: City A, 2010 at 78 µg/m³, 2012 at 77 µg/m³, 2014 at 76 µg/m³, 2016 at 74 µg/m³, 2018 at 71 µg/m³, 2020 at 68 µg/m³; City B, 2010 at 63 µg/m³, 2012 at 64 µg/m³, 2014 at 66 µg/m³, 2016 at 70 µg/m³, 2018 at 67 µg/m³, 2020 at 65 µg/m³; City C, 2010 at 41 µg/m³, 2012 at 43 µg/m³, 2014 at 46 µg/m³, 2016 at 48 µg/m³, 2018 at 47 µg/m³, 2020 at 45 µg/m³.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The line graph shows air pollution levels in three cities—City A, City B, and City C—between 2010 and 2020. Overall, City A had the highest pollution levels throughout the period, while City C had the lowest. City B’s pollution levels increased over time, eventually approaching those of City A.

In 2010, City A had the worst air pollution, with a level of 80 µg/m³. However, pollution in this city gradually declined over the years, reaching around 65 µg/m³ in 2020. This suggests that the city may have taken measures to reduce air pollution.

City B had lower pollution levels at the beginning, with around 60 µg/m³ in 2010. However, the levels steadily increased, peaking at 75 µg/m³ in 2017. After that, there was a slight decline, but air pollution still remained high at 70 µg/m³ in 2020.

City C, in contrast, consistently had the lowest pollution levels. It started at 40 µg/m³ in 2010, rising slightly to 50 µg/m³ in 2015, before gradually decreasing to 45 µg/m³ by 2020. This indicates that air quality in City C remained relatively stable compared to the other two cities.

In conclusion, while City A saw an improvement in air quality, it remained the most polluted. City B’s pollution increased significantly, whereas City C had the least pollution, with only minor changes over time.

Word Count: 220

Answers On The Same Topic:

The chart below shows the levels of air pollution in three major cities (City A, City B, and City C) from 2010 to 2020. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart illustrates the levels of air pollution in three major cities:City A, City B, and City C between 2010 and 2020. Overall, the level of air pollution in City B decreased slightly, before increasing over the period. However, the level of air pollution in City A experienced a downward trend, while the level of […]

The chart below shows the levels of air pollution in three major cities (City A, City B, and City C) from 2010 to 2020. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart provided the air pollution levels in three cities, city A, B and C from 2010 to 2020. In summary, three cities had decrease the amount of air pollution through years with different of levels. First, city A had the most air pollution level in overall with 80 per meter but it did a […]

The chart below shows the levels of air pollution in three major cities (City A, City B, and City C) from 2010 to 2020. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart illustrates the levels of air pollution in three major cities—City A, City B, and City C—between 2010 and 2020. Overall, while all three cities experienced fluctuations in pollution levels over the decade, City A had the highest levels throughout the period, whereas City C remained the least polluted. In 2010, City A recorded […]

See All

Other Topics:

The line graph gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries.

The line graph illustrates the number of international visitors to five different countries: Brazil, Egypt, Malaysia, France, and the USA, between 1995 and 2010. Overall, all five countries saw an increase in tourist arrivals over the fifteen-year period. France and the USA were consistenly the most popular destinations, while Brazil and Egypt stayed the least […]

The line graph gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries.

International Tourists Arrivals The line graph illustrates the number of international visitors to five different countries: Brazil, Egypt, Malaysia, France, and the USA -between 1995 and 2010. Overall, all five countries saw an increase in tourist arrivals over the fifteen-year period. France and the USA were consistently the most popular destinations, while Brazil and Egypt […]

line graph; Number of arrests per year for using illegal drugs

The given line graph illustrates the amount of arrests per year for consumption of illegal drugs in the period of 1991 and 2005. Overall, it is noticeable that the number of arrests uplifted by the end of the given period. In 1991, the number of arrests of drug-users stood at 10. Over the following 3 […]

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The graph below shows the percentage of money spent on advertising in five types of media in France from 2010 and projected spending to 2040. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. You should write at least 150 words. Writing Task 1

The given line graph compares the percentage of funds which were spent on television, newspapers, magazines, radio, and internet in France from 2010 and projected spending by 2040. Overall, while four traditional types of advertising are facing decline in funding, the level of investments in Internet is expected to grow significantly until the end of […]

The graph below shows the percentage of total electricity generated by four different fuel sources in a specific European country between 1990 and 2025. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph demonstrates the percentage of total electricity created by four different fuel sources in specific European country in 1990 to 2025 Overall, it is clear that electricity generated by coal sharply declined, whereas the percentage of renewables and nuclear energy rose slightly, and natural gas has fluctuated. In 1990, the percentage of energy generated […]

The graph below shows the number of inquiries received by the tourist information office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. Summarise this information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the number of enquiries received by the Tourist information office in one city over a period of six months in 2011. Overall, face to face enquiries increased most dramatically over the last six months period, while enquiries by email or letter decreased consistently. Telephone also climbed steadily throughout the period. In […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.