🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Bar Chart

Band 6+: The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Image for topic: The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image displays percentages of four types of household waste recycled in 1992, 1997, and 2002. For plastic: 1992 has approximately 5%, 1997 close to 10%, and 2002 near 10%. For cans: 1992 shows about 10%, 1997 around 15%, and 2002 reaches approximately 25%. For paper: 1992 indicates around 15%, 1997 close to 20%, and 2002 approximately 50%. For glass: 1992 highlights 40%, 1997 roughly 25%, and 2002 about 30%.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The line chart provides information regarding the proportions of four distinct recycled household waste in a particular city from 1992 to 2002.

Overall, it is evident that with the exception of plastic, the other three types: paper, glass, and cans, were recorded at nearly similar figures initially. However, glass was the most prevalent type of waste recycled by citizens by the end of the surveyed years.

In 1992, the level for glass stood at roughly 18%, staying at a similar point in comparison to that for paper. Over the next 5 years, the percentages of recyclable glass and paper rose considerably by 15% and 10%, respectively. Eventually, they continuously underwent substantial growth in the period from 1997 to 2002. In particular, the biggest difference between them was a gap of approximately 10%, with the figure for glass higher, standing at nearly 48%.

When it comes to the category of cans, it showed a more moderate pattern at the beginning. After decreasing slightly from roughly 18% in 1992 to 15% in 1997, a dramatic increase could be observed in this indicator, finishing at around 28% in 2002 as the third rate. In contrast, there were no significant alterations in the plastic sector, fluctuating just under and just over 10% during the examined period.

Word Count: 212

Answers On The Same Topic:

The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar graph provides information regarding the proportion of various types of recycled household waste: the plastic, the paper, the glass and the cans, in a particular city, from 1992 to 2002. Overall, there was an increasing trend for all figures, albeit to different trajectories. Notably, glass was the dominant figure throughout the period, closely […]

The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given chart demonstrates the proportion of six types of household waste that were reused in one city from 1992 to 2002. Overall, the ratio of waste recycled saw an upward trend. Furthermore, recycled glass took the lion’s share in 3 years. While, plastic was the smallest reused item. It can be seen that in […]

The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The data above displays the proportion of variety of types of residences’s wastes that were recycled in one town from 1992 to 2002 Overall, the bar chart represents that as the year increases the percentage of reprocessed wastes increases First and foremost, the most percentage of household waste recycled in the graph above is Glass […]

The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart depicts the proportion of various categories of household waste which is recycled in one particular country from 1992 to 2002 Overall the percentage of recycling material was height in 2002 in every category. However plastic is only items that was remain stable in every year. In terms of glass almost 50 percent of […]

See All

Other Topics:

The bar chart illustrates the changes in the proportion of individuals in the UK

The bar chart illustrates the changes in the proportion of individuals in the UK consuming five portions of fruits and vegetables daily from 2001 to 2008. As seen, women occupies the highest proportion of eating five portions of fruit and vegetables per day throughout the period. Specifically, the percentage of women has risen steadily since […]

The chart shows the proportion of seats an airline was able to fill at three time points. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.

The bar chart illustrates the percentage of passenger load in Wright Brothers Airways across three different fare classes in the three separate years, 2005, 2010, and 2015. Overall, economy and premium economy experienced a substantial growth, with the latter reaching the highest proportion, while business class witnessed a significant decline over the ten-year period. Besides, […]

The bar chart showed the percentage of school children learning to play four different musical instruments (violin, guitar, piano, drums) in 3 years 2005, 2010, 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The percentage of academic institution children learning to play four musical instruments such as piano, guitar, violin and drums through 3 timelines – 2005, 2010 and 2015 is showed by the bar chart given. Overall, piano and guitar were always the priority choices, showed through its high percentages while drums and violin were not as […]

'The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restorants between 2003 and 2013.

The table data indicates the information of how often American citizens ate fast food in 2003, 2006 and 2013. It can be clearly seen that most people consumed fast food once a week or once or twice a month. Whereas a very low number of people has eaten fast food everyday or never eaten. According […]

The graph below compares the proportion of time Australian parents spent helping their children with different activities in the year 2013. Provide an overview of the information by identifying and describing the key details, and include comparisons where appropriate.

The given graph indicates the amount of time adults in Australia assisting their kids in distinct activities in 2013 by percent. Overall, it can be clearly observed that moms majorly accompany their children in household chores such as dressing and doing homework, while playing games and preparing for beds are more favoured in terms of […]

The bar chart shows the percentages of the UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011.

The bar chart below illustrates the proportion of workers in different profession fields (manufacturing, services, agriculture/fishing, construction and energy/water) in two years: 1841 and 2011. Overall, it is clear that the percentage of the UK workforce in service industry employed in the service industry was the highest in 2011. Additionally, in 1841 production and maintenance […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.