Multiple Graphs

Band 7+: The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image illustrates the age at which people got married in 1996 and 2008, segregated by gender. In 1996, for ages 16-19, 1 female, 2 males; 20-24, 5 females, 2 males; 25-29, 8 females, 13 males; 30-34, 7 females, 9 males; 35-39, 5 females, 8 males; 40-44, 3 females, 5 males. In 2008, for ages 16-19, 2 females, 1 male; 20-24, 2 females, 1 male; 25-29, 10 females, 11 males; 30-34, 8 females, 13 males; 35-39, 7 females, 11 males; 40-44, 3 females, 4 males.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The bar charts compare the percentage of people who got married in six distinct age brackets in 1996 and 2008.

Overall, the proportion of females getting married experienced a slight decrease, apart from people aged 25-29, while that of men in 30-34 and 35-39 increased considerably. Noticeably, the percentage of married men in the last three age groups was much higher than that of women.

In 1996, there was around 1% of females aged 16-19 getting married, which was also true in 2008, while there was no male getting married at that age. In the 20-24 age bracket, the percentage of married people was 6% of females and 2% of males. Notably, people in the 25-29 group accounted for the largest share, which was below 12% for females and around 9% for males. There were 7% of women aged 30-34 getting married, and the downward trend continuously happened in the 35-39 and 40-44 age groups, which recorded 4% and 2% respectively. Additionally, the statistics of married male depicted the same trend, which registered 2% in the last age group.

Regarding 2008, the proportion of females and males getting married between the ages of 20-24 was below 4% and 2% for each group, while those of the 25-29 group reached 12% for females and 8% for males. Also, the statistics of married women in the 30-34, 35-39 and 40-44 groups was by far lower than those of men, which were 8, above 2 and 2% respectively. Meanwhile, men in these age brackets registered the number of above 11% for both the 30-34 and 35-39 groups, and less than 4% for the last one.

Word Count: 272

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
A2 - Upper Beginner
Consider using more varied and advanced words.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

married: 10

females: 6

getting: 5

which: 5

people: 4

30-34: 4

35-39: 4

groups: 4

males: 4

percentage: 3

25-29: 3

while: 3

there: 3

group: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report effectively addresses the task by summarizing the main features and making comparisons between the two years and genders. The overall trend is clearly identified, and the data is presented in a structured manner. However, there are some inaccuracies in the data (e.g., the percentage for males in the 25-29 age group in 1996 is stated as around 9%, but the visual description indicates 13 males, which may be a percentage of 13%; similarly, the 2008 figures for males in the 30-34 and 35-39 groups are described as 'above 11%' but the visual description suggests 13% and 11% respectively). Additionally, some figures are imprecise (e.g., 'around 1%' for 16-19 in 1996, while the visual description shows 1 female and 2 males, which could be interpreted as 1% and 2%). The report could be improved by ensuring all data points are accurately reported and by avoiding vague language such as 'by far lower' and 'above 2%'. Overall, the response is well-organized and covers the main trends, but minor data inaccuracies and imprecise descriptions prevent it from achieving a higher band score.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report is logically organized with a clear overview and separate paragraphs for each year. However, the flow could be improved by using more varied cohesive devices and ensuring smoother transitions between sentences and ideas. For example, the phrase 'which was also true in 2008' is slightly awkward and could be rephrased for clarity. Additionally, the final paragraph could be better structured to avoid listing data in a way that feels slightly disjointed. Overall, the message is easy to follow, but there is room for more sophisticated cohesion.

Lexical Resource

The report uses a good range of vocabulary related to data description (e.g., 'accounted for', 'registered', 'depicted the same trend'). However, there are some instances of imprecise or informal phrasing, such as 'by far lower' and 'the number of above 11%'. More precise and varied expressions could be used, such as 'considerably lower' and 'exceeded 11%'. Additionally, the repetition of 'getting married' could be reduced by using synonyms like 'tying the knot' or 'marrying'. Overall, the lexical resource is adequate but not fully flexible or sophisticated. Pay attention to vocabulary repetition to improve the overall score.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report demonstrates a good range of grammatical structures, including complex sentences and appropriate use of tenses. However, there are minor errors and awkward phrasings that affect accuracy. For example, 'the statistics of married male depicted' should be 'the statistics for married males depicted', and 'the statistics of married women ... was' should be 'were' (subject-verb agreement). Additionally, some sentences are overly long and could be broken down for clarity. Overall, the grammar is mostly accurate, but there are a few errors that prevent it from being fully controlled.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.

The given bar graph shows the preferred marriage age for different individuals in a certain country in the year 1998 and 2008. Overall,it is evident that majority of people got married in their middle age rather than the teenage age.Most males than females seem to like the young adult age. In 1998 there were more […]

Band 5+

The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.

Band 5+

The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.

The given charts compare the age of men and women getting married in one particular country in 1998 and 2008. Overall, the charts clearly shows the most common age range when people enter a marriage was 25 to 39 for both genders. Moreover, the age range from 25-29 was the most ideal age to get […]

Band 7+

The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.

The two charts above illustrates the percentages of people marrying in one particular country from different age ranges regarding the years 1996 and 2008 . Overall, underage marraiges are significantly lower in modern times, while there were little differences in amount of young adult percentage. In 2008, most of the male adults tends to get […]

Band 5+

See All

The chart below shows the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spend doing homework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 in one country.

The graph indicates the changes of proprietorship of electronic machines and spend much hours and minutes in housework in family unit in one state between 1920 to 2019. Overall , the number of hours spend doing work in house is raised without electric devices like washing machines , vaccum cleaner and refrigerators but rising over […]

Band 4+

The provided charts illustrate the different types of courses, which were followed by the students during the years of 1984, 1994 and 2004.

The pie charts illustrate various types of courses that students undertook in the years of 1984, 1994, and 2004. Overall, the majority of the students took face to face courses while the online courses contained the least part of their course percentage in all three periods. Additionally, the percentage rate for 1994 and 2004 remained […]

Band 6+

The pie chart below illustrates the average commuting time of UK workers in 2009, while the bar chart compares the methods of travelling to work in London and the rest of the UK in the same year.

The pie chart depicts how much time the UK population allocated to commuting to work, while the bar one illustrates how they traveled to work in 2009. Overall, it is clear that most UK commuters spent under 30 minutes on their daily travel. Additionally, people of both London and the other areas of the UK […]

Band 7+

See All

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium