The bar graph illustrates information about hiring rates of two genders during 1995 and 2005 across 6 countries: Australia, Switzerland, Iceland, the UK, New Zealand, and the USA.
In general, as the graph suggests, while the employment rate of males was higher than females in both years, the likelihood of females being hired a decade later showed an upward trend. The overall employment condition in UK was comparatively better than in Australia, making the working class of the UK the most diverse, while men work primarily in Australia, making working females a minority.
To begin with, Iceland in 1995 and 2005 showed the highest data for both males and females, with around 70% and 82% for men and close to 55% and 68% respectively.
Following this, for Iceland, males were stated as the dominant working gender, creating a huge gap between with females for both years. In comparison to that, for males, the lowest data to be recorded in 1995 and a decade later was about 55% and 68% in Australia. In contrast to this, while in New Zealand the lowest rate was 23% in 1995 for females, after ten years, the lowest data belonged to Australia with 48%.
In conclusion, as can be observed from the graph, as the years passed past the number of women working rose in an incredible amount, while similar progress happened to the males. Moreover, the UK provided the most diverse working conditions, while Australia provided the least.