🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Line Graph

Band 6+: The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nations.

Image for topic: The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nations.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image shows Iceland's oil usage starting from 1966 at around 70%, peaking at 80% around 1986, and declining gradually to about 50% by 2006. Sweden begins at around 70% in 1966, quickly drops to 50% by 1976, continues to decrease to 20% by 1986, and stabilizes below 20% till 2006. Italy starts at 30% in 1966, rises steadily to 50% by 1986, and maintains just below 40% by 2006. Turkey starts at less than 10% in 1966, which increases slightly to around 10% by 1986 and remains constant till 2006.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The graph shows changes in the rate of oil usage in four countries, including Iceland, Sweden, Italy and Turkey, over a forty-year period from 1966 to 2006.

Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were considerable downward trends in the oil consumption of Sweden and Iceland, while the oil usage in Turkey saw gradual rise in over the period. Another interesting point is that Italy had highest reliance on oil as an energy in 1966, but in 2006, Turkey took the leadership.

More specifically, as regards Italy, the percentage of oil usage started at 90% in 1966, then there was a slight rise until it peaked at approximately 95% over the next decade. Further however, the rate experienced a gradual decline, ultimating at around 85% in 2006.

Likewise, Iceland and Sweden demonstrated a lowering rate of oil usage. As for Iceland, it started at 80%, falling significantly to 40% for the following twenty years. Further, it proceeded falling, although it followed a relatively moderate pace, reaching its lowest point at about 35% in 2006. Regarding Sweden, the trend was similar. Starting at roughly 70% in 1966, the rate witnessed a nitable reduction to 30% in 1966. Having remained stable at the rate over the next decade, it further fell reaching its lowest figure at 20% in 2006.

By contrast, as for Turkey, it followed an opposite trend over the period. Beginning at 60% in 1966, the rate of oil usage in Turkey witnessed a substantial growth over the whole timeline, peaking at just under 90% in 2006.

Word Count: 260

Answers On The Same Topic:

The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nations.

The line graph compares the percentage of total energy consumption derived from oil in Iceland, Sweden, Italy and Turkey over the period from 1966 to 2006. Overall, oil consumption declined substantially in Sweden and Iceland, whereas Turkey experienced a steady increase throughout the period. Furthermore, although Italy remained one of the most oil-dependent countries, Turkey […]

The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nations.

The line graph compares the percentage of total energy consumption derived from oil in Iceland, Sweden, Italy and Turkey over the period from 1966 to 2006. Overall, oil consumption declined substantially in Sweden and Iceland, whereas Turkey experienced a steady increase throughout the period. Furthermore, although Italy remained one of the most oil-dependent countries, Turkey […]

The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nations.

The line graph given illustrates the percentage of oil consumption in four different countries namely Iceland, Sweden, Italy and Turkey from 1966 to 2006. Overall, it is clear to see that the proportion of oil usage in Turkey experienced an upward trend, opposed to the figure for the three remaining countries. In addition, Iceland had […]

The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nations.

Between the years 1966 and 2000, we will summarize the information of four different countries (i.e., Iceland, Sweden, Italy, and Turkiye) for each year as follows: 1. In 1966, Italy is the country that used the most oil at 90 percent of the total energy use, followed by Sweden and Iceland with oil usage of […]

See All

Other Topics:

Question You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The graph shows average annual percentages of online adults who use different social networks. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words

The line gaph illustrates the percentage of American adults who used five different social media apps, namely Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest, LinkedIn and Twitter from 2012 to 2016. Overall, Facebook was by the most widely used app throughout the period. Although the other four platforms had lower figures, all of them increased over the period, with […]

The graph below shows the number of international students who enrolled in three different universities in Canada between 2000 and 2020.

The line graph illustrates the number of abroad students joined in three various majors- engineering, business and arts in one of the united kingdom universities-A,B and C over a period of 20 years from 2000 to 2020. Business showed a sharp increase between 2000 and 2010, rising from 1500 to 4000 students, then a gradual […]

The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

the given line graph illustrates amount of birth rates in China and USA between 1920 and 2000. overall, China had significant flactuations over the period and felt down by the end. The USA had not as flactuations as China, however had noteable decrease by the end. Additionally, both country were an identical level in the […]

The line graph below shows the amount of chicken, pizza, and fish consumed in a particular country from 1990 to 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the average amount of chicken, pizza, and fish consumed in a particular country over a period of 30 years starting from 1990 Overall, while the consumption of chicken and pizza witnessed an upward trend, the opposite was true for that of fish. Additionally, by the end of the period, the highest […]

The line graph shows the percentage of people who used three different types of transport (car, bus, and bicycle) to travel to work in a city between 2000 and 2020.

The presented bar chart illustrates the percentage of people who used different types of transport for commuting in a city in 2000 and 2020. Looking at the overall trends, it is evident that cars were the most commonly used means of transportation in 2020, whereas bicycles were the least used in 2000. Looking more closely […]

The graph below shows the sepending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countires between 1975 and 2000.

The line graph compares the amount of money spent on research in four different nations, namely Switzerland, Denmark, Spain and the UK, over the period from 1975 to 2000. The figures are given in dollars. Overall, it can be seen that Switzerland remained the highest-spending country on research and showed an upward trend, while Denmark […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress & Analyze Mistakes By Question Type
Save Your Own Flashcard Sets & Use Them On Any Device
Unlock All Courses, IELTS Tests, Section & Part Practice
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools & AI Features
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.