Multiple Graphs

Band 6+: The graphs below provide information on drivers' use of hand-held and hands free mobile phones in England from 2002 to 2009, while the pie chart shows the types of road accidents cause by the use of mobile phones in 2013.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The graphs below provide information on drivers' use of hand-held and hands free mobile phones in England from 2002 to 2009, while the pie chart shows the types of road accidents cause by the use of mobile phones in 2013.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image includes two line graphs and one pie chart. The first line graph shows "Mobile phone use by drivers: Survey results for England" detailing hand-held mobile phone use (2002: Car 2.3%, Van/lorry 0.5%; 2003: Car 2.8%, Van/lorry 0.5%; 2004: Car 2.8%, Van/lorry 0.7%; 2005: Car 2.4%, Van/lorry 0.8%; 2006: Car 2.5%, Van/lorry 1.0%; 2007: Car 2.6%, Van/lorry 1.7%; 2008: Car 2.6%, Van/lorry 1.3%; 2009: Car 3.8%, Van/lorry 1.6%). The second line graph showcases "Hands free" mobile phone use (2002: Car 1.2%, Van/lorry 2.2%; 2003: Car 1.3%, Van/lorry 2.4%; 2004: Car 1.3%, Van/lorry 2.3%; 2005: Car 1.6%, Van/lorry 1.9%; 2006: Car 1.7%, Van/lorry 2.0%; 2007: Car 1.8%, Van,lorry 1.7%; 2008: Car 1.8%, Van/lorry 1.9%; 2009: Car 1.0%, Van/lorry 2.6%). The pie chart from "Road accidents caused by use of mobile phone by drivers - England 2013" depicts fatal accidents 22, serious accidents 73, slight accidents 327.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The given graphs depict the use of hand-held and hands free mobile phones by drivers in car and van or lorry in England from 2002 to 2009, while the pie chart shows 3 categories of road accidents caused by drivers who used mobile phone

Both line graphs experienced significant changes throughout the period with initial fluctuations for both graphs which experienced increase at the end of the period. For the pie chart, most road accidents were slight, with a small number of fatal ones.

Initially, the use for hand-held and hands free mobile phones in car was accounted for below 2%, and below 3% for van or lorry transports where both figures were decreasing until 2005. trends for hands free phones in car and van or lorry experienced increases in 2004, before falling dramatically until 2006. Contrastly, use of hand-held mobile phones in van or lorry transports reached almost 3% in 2006, with a notable decline in 2007. figure for car drivers using hand-held and hands free mobile phones witnessed increase at 1.5% at the end. Trends for van or lorry drivers using hand held phones reached over 2.5% while hands free mobile phone users were below 2.5%.

Use of mobile phone by drivers caused total of 422 road accidents, where the vast majority of these accidents was considered as slight, while 73 of them was serious accidents and 23 fatal.

Word Count: 231

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
B2 - Upper Intermediate
Opt for even more advanced words when appropriate.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

mobile: 7

phones: 6

hands: 5

drivers: 5

lorry: 5

accidents: 5

hand-held: 4

graphs: 3

while: 3

experienced: 3

below: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report provides a general overview of the data and attempts to describe trends and comparisons. However, there are some inaccuracies in data interpretation (e.g., 'hand-held mobile phones in van or lorry transports reached almost 3% in 2006' is not supported by the data) and omissions (e.g., specific years and values are not consistently mentioned). The structure is logical, but the language could be clearer and more precise. To improve, focus on accurately reporting key trends and specific data points, and ensure that comparisons are clearly explained.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report has a logical structure, but the flow is sometimes disrupted by unclear referencing and abrupt transitions. For example, the second paragraph attempts to summarise trends but lacks clear signposting between the line graphs and the pie chart. Paragraphing could be improved by separating the discussion of the two line graphs more distinctly and by ensuring each paragraph has a clear central topic. Using cohesive devices such as 'in contrast', 'similarly', or 'overall' more effectively would help the reader follow the comparison between vehicle types and phone types.

Lexical Resource

The vocabulary is adequate for the task, with some good attempts at paraphrasing (e.g., 'experienced significant changes', 'notable decline'). However, there are instances of repetition (e.g., 'use of hand-held and hands free mobile phones') and some awkward or imprecise phrasing (e.g., 'accounted for below 2%', 'figure for car drivers... witnessed increase at 1.5%'). To improve, aim for more varied and natural collocations, such as 'the proportion of drivers using...', 'a steady rise was observed', or 'the figures fluctuated'. Avoid overly literal translations and ensure terms like 'contrastly' are replaced with standard adverbs like 'in contrast'.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report contains several grammatical errors and punctuation issues that affect clarity. Examples include missing articles ('the use for hand-held... phones in car'), subject-verb agreement errors ('most of these accidents was considered'), and incorrect plural forms ('van or lorry transports'). Sentence structures are often simple or fragmented, and there are run-on sentences. To improve, focus on using a wider range of complex structures (e.g., relative clauses, conditional phrases) and proofread for basic errors. Practising correct article usage and subject-verb agreement will significantly enhance accuracy.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The graphs below provide information on drivers’ use of hand-held and hands free mobile phones in England from 2002 to 2009, while the pie chart shows the types of road accidents cause by the use of mobile phones in 2013.

The line graphs given show statistics on the percentage of drivers’ hand-held and hands-free mobile phone use in England from 2002 to 2009, while the pie chart illustrates the kinds of road accidents caused by the usage of mobile phones in 2013. Overall, car and van/lorry drivers, despite considerable shifts, displayed an upward trend in […]

Band 8+

The graphs below provide information on drivers’ use of hand-held and hands free mobile phones in England from 2002 to 2009, while the pie chart shows the types of road accidents cause by the use of mobile phones in 2013.

The line graphs present a comparison of mobile phone use by car and van or lorry drivers: hand-held and hands free in England between 2002 and 2009, meanwhile the pie chart depicts the proportion of three kinds of road accidents (fatal, serious, and slight accidents) which caused by the usage of mobile phones in 2013. […]

Band 6+

See All

The chart below shows the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spend doing homework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 in one country.

The graph indicates the changes of proprietorship of electronic machines and spend much hours and minutes in housework in family unit in one state between 1920 to 2019. Overall , the number of hours spend doing work in house is raised without electric devices like washing machines , vaccum cleaner and refrigerators but rising over […]

Band 4+

The provided charts illustrate the different types of courses, which were followed by the students during the years of 1984, 1994 and 2004.

The pie charts illustrate various types of courses that students undertook in the years of 1984, 1994, and 2004. Overall, the majority of the students took face to face courses while the online courses contained the least part of their course percentage in all three periods. Additionally, the percentage rate for 1994 and 2004 remained […]

Band 6+

The pie chart below illustrates the average commuting time of UK workers in 2009, while the bar chart compares the methods of travelling to work in London and the rest of the UK in the same year.

The pie chart depicts how much time the UK population allocated to commuting to work, while the bar one illustrates how they traveled to work in 2009. Overall, it is clear that most UK commuters spent under 30 minutes on their daily travel. Additionally, people of both London and the other areas of the UK […]

Band 7+

See All