Multiple Graphs

Band 6+: The pie charts above show a comparison of kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The pie charts above show a comparison of kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image presents a comparison of energy production by type in a European country for the years 1995 and 2005, with specific percentages allocated to each energy type for both years. In 1995, energy production was distributed as follows: Coal at 29.80%, Gas at 29.63%, Petro at 29.27%, Nuclear at 6.40%, and Other at 4.90%. In 2005, the distribution changed to: Coal at 30.93%, Gas at 30.31%, Petro at 19.55%, Nuclear at 10.10%, and Other at 9.10%.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The pie charts compares proportions of different types of sourses, coal, gas, petro and other, using to produce energy in a country loacted in Europe in two years, 1996 and 2005.

Overall, it can be seen that in both years, the majoraty of energy was created using coal, meanwhile the other was the lowest.

Regarding producing energy using coal and gas in 1995, they formed almost the same amount of 29.8% and 29.63% of the total sourses of energy, respectively. Ten years later, these number rose slightly by around 1% to 30.93% and 30.31%, respectively. Likewise, nuclear and other powered created only 6.40% and 4.90%. By 2005, the energy produced utilizing these methodes has increased markedly to 10.10% of nuclear, while other sectors was doubled.

Petro in 1995, on the other hand, counterputed of 29.27% of the total amount of energy. This precentage decreased noticeably by more than 10% to 19.55% in 2005.

Word Count: 153

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
B2 - Upper Intermediate
Opt for even more advanced words when appropriate.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

energy: 6

other: 5

using: 3

years: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report effectively addresses the task by comparing the energy production types across the two years and includes an overall trend. However, there are some inaccuracies (e.g., '1996' instead of '1995') and minor omissions (e.g., 'Other' is not fully described in the overview). The language is generally clear, but there are spelling and grammatical errors (e.g., 'sourses,' 'majoraty,' 'precentage') that slightly affect clarity. To improve, ensure accurate data representation and proofread for spelling and grammar.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report has a clear overall structure with an introduction, an overview, and detailed paragraphs. However, there are some lapses in coherence, such as the incorrect mention of '1996' instead of '1995', which can confuse the reader. The use of cohesive devices is somewhat mechanical (e.g., 'Regarding', 'Likewise', 'On the other hand'), and some transitions could be smoother. Paragraphing is adequate but could be more skillfully managed to separate trends more clearly.

Lexical Resource

The vocabulary is adequate for the task but contains several errors and imprecise choices, such as 'sourses' (sources), 'loacted' (located), 'majoraty' (majority), 'counterputed' (comprised/accounted for), and 'precentage' (percentage). There is some attempt at variety (e.g., 'rose slightly', 'increased markedly', 'decreased noticeably'), but the range is limited and not always natural. More sophisticated and accurate lexical choices would improve the score.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report uses a mix of simple and complex structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that affect clarity. Examples include subject-verb agreement errors ('The pie charts compares'), incorrect verb forms ('using to produce'), tense inconsistency ('has increased' vs. 'was doubled'), and article misuse. Punctuation is generally correct but could be improved. A wider range of structures with greater accuracy is needed for a higher score.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The pie charts above show a comparison of kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005.

The pie charts illustrate the proportion of different types of energy production in a European nation in 1995 and 2005. Overall, coal and gas were the dominant energy sources in both years, while petro became less significant. In detail, the figures for coal and gas rose slightly from 29.8% and 29.63% to 30.93% and 30.31% […]

Band 6+

The pie charts above show a comparison of kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005.

The pie chart illustrates the proportion of energy production across distinct energy sources within a European nation from 1995 to 2005. Overall, it is apparent that Coal and Gas were the dominant energy producers over a ten-year period. Notably, the figure for Nuclear and ” Other” increased, while the opposite was true for Petro. Looking […]

Band 6+

The pie charts above show a comparison of kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005.

The two pie charts compare the proportion of energy production in a European nation over a ten-year period starting from 1995. Overall, a general upward trend was recorded for most categories throughout the given period, except from petrol which showed a significant decline. In addition, although unspecified energies represented the most dramatic growth, Coal remained […]

Band 8+

The pie charts above show a comparison of kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005.

Overall, the two pie charts illustrate the distribution of energy production in France over a 10-year period. It is evident that coal and gas remained the dominant energy sources in both 1995 and 2005, while nuclear power and other alternative sources accounted for a smaller share. Notably, the contribution of the latter categories almost doubled […]

Band 9

See All

comparison of the percentage of water used and theo total of income

The first pie chart shows the percentages of water used in 2004 for different products, while the second pie chart shows the percentages of incomes of these products. Overall, vegetables were the most products consumed water, while fruits recorded the highest income. Vegetables products consumed the highest proportion of water in 2004, accounting for 46 […]

Band 5+

The charts give information about the average amount of time per day spend two common leisure ...

The two bar charts compare how many minutes per day New Zealanders in five age groups spend reading for pleasure and listening to music. Overall, time spent reading rises steadily with age, whereas listening to music follows an uneven pattern, with the youngest and oldest groups spending the most time on it. Looking at reading […]

Band 8+

See All

Band 6+: The pie charts above show a comparison of kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

The pie charts above show a comparison of kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005.

The pie charts above show a comparison of kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005.

The pie charts above show a comparison of kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005.

The pie charts above show a comparison of kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005.

Other Topics:

comparison of the percentage of water used and theo total of income

The charts give information about the average amount of time per day spend two common leisure ...

The graphs below show the total percentage of films released and the total percentage of ticket sales in 1996 and 2006 in a country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium