Band 6+: The table below shows the postgrauate course fees in US dollars that international students paid in three countries in 2007.

The report effectively addresses the task by comparing the fees across the three countries and highlighting key trends, such as Country A having the lowest fees and science being the most expensive. The overall structure is clear, with an introduction, overview, and detailed paragraphs. However, there are some inaccuracies and omissions: the report states that arts and commerce fees were identical across all three countries, which is correct, but it incorrectly claims that computing and science fees were the same in Country A (they are both $11,000, so this is accurate based on the visual description). The phrase 'identical fees across all three countries' for arts and commerce is slightly misleading because the fees differ between countries (e.g., $8,000 in A vs. $18,000 in B), though they are identical within each country. Additionally, the report omits the specific fee for computing in Country B ($27,000) and Country C ($24,000), and the description of meals and accommodation could be more precise. Minor grammatical issues (e.g., 'both course' should be 'both courses', 'stood at' should be 'standing at') do not significantly detract from the overall clarity. To improve, ensure all data points are accurately mentioned and avoid ambiguous phrasing.

The report is generally well-organized with a clear overall statement and logical grouping of categories. However, there are minor lapses in cohesion, such as the abrupt transition from the overview to the details. The paragraphing is adequate but could be more skillfully managed to improve flow.

The vocabulary used is appropriate and generally accurate, with some good attempts at variation (e.g., 'identical', 'recorded the highest figure'). However, there is some repetition (e.g., 'identical fees', 'just at') and a lack of sophistication. More precise and varied terms could enhance the lexical range.

The report uses a mix of simple and complex structures, but there are several grammatical errors and awkward phrasings (e.g., 'both course' should be 'both courses', 'stood at' should be 'standing at' or 'which stood at'). Punctuation is mostly correct, but the errors affect clarity and accuracy. Improving grammatical control would strengthen the report.