🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!

Table

Band 7+: The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010. (Figures are in millions of dollars). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010. (Figures are in millions of dollars). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image consists of a table with four rows labeled USA, EU, Other countries, and Total, and five columns for years labeled 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010. In 2006, USA had 9,8, EU had 3,1, Other countries had 2,8, with a Total of 15,7. In 2007, USA had 11, EU had 3,4, Other countries had 3,2, with a Total of 17,6. In 2008, USA had 17, EU had 3,9, Other countries had 3,5, with a Total of 24,4. In 2009, USA had 16,7, EU had 3,6, Other countries had 3,2, with a Total of 23,5. In 2010, USA had 20,3, EU had 4,1, Other countries had 3,7, with a Total of 28,1.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The given table illustrates how the funds into developing nations, steaming from the US, EU countries, and other countries, had changed between 2006 and 2010, measured in millions of dollars.

It is noticeable that the amount of money from all specified nations witnessed an upward trend over the observed period. Additionally, the USA was the most prevalent donator, directly affecting the total funds.

Looking first at the USA, there was a twofold increase in its fund, equivalent to rising from 9.8 to 20.3 with a notable upsurge recorded in 2007-2008 duration. This can be relatively translated into a rise from 15.7 to 28.1 in the total funds.

As for EU and unspecified nations, EU nations rised its fund allocation by 1 from 3.1, despite a drop of 0.3 exhibited from 2008 to 2009. Similarly, the first 2 years saw a growth of 0.7 in the quantity of money from unspecified nations, followed by a fall by 0.3 in 2009, then increased significantly to 3.7 by 2010.

Word Count: 166

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

7.5

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
B2 - Upper Intermediate
Opt for even more advanced words when appropriate.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

nations: 5

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report effectively summarizes the main trends and provides relevant comparisons. The data is mostly accurate, and the overall structure is clear. To further improve, consider providing more specific comparisons between the EU and other countries, and ensure all data points are completely accurate.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report is generally well-organized with a clear structure, including an introduction, overview, and detailed paragraphs. However, transitions between some sentences and ideas could be smoother to enhance the flow. For instance, in the third paragraph, the connection between the USA's contribution and the total funds could be more explicitly stated. Also, consider using a wider range of cohesive devices to avoid repetition.

Lexical Resource

The report demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, using terms like 'witnessed an upward trend,' 'prevalent donator,' and 'upsurge.' However, there are instances where the word choice could be more precise or sophisticated. For example, 'rised' is not the correct form of the verb. Consider using synonyms and more varied language to describe changes and trends.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report exhibits a good command of grammar, with a mix of simple and complex sentences. However, there are some grammatical errors and phrasing issues that need attention. For example, 'EU nations rised its fund allocation by 1 from 3.1' contains errors in verb form and preposition usage. Proofreading carefully and focusing on correct verb tenses and prepositional phrases will improve accuracy.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010. (Figures are in millions of dollars). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the financial contribution to developing nations from the USA, EU countries and other countries between 2006 and 2010. Overall, there was an increase in the total amount of money given to developing countries by all countries. In addition, it was also notable that the USA investing the largest amount of money to […]

Band 8+

The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010. (Figures are in millions of dollars). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the data on the amount of money donated to developing nations by the USA, EU, other countries, and the total amount. Overall, the total amount of donated money rose dramatically throughout the period. While the amount of donations in the USA experienced significant growth and doubled, the EU and remaining nations had […]

Band 7+

The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010. (Figures are in millions of dollars). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table compares the amount of money allocated to developing countries by the USA, EU countries, and the category labelled as “other countries” between 2006 and 2010. Overall, the US consistently devoted the most significant amounts of money to developing countries, while other countries recorded the lowest numbers. Notably, all three countries demonstrated an upward […]

Band 8+

The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010. (Figures are in millions of dollars). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the money allocated for developing countries by the US, EU counties and other remaining countries between 2006 and 2010, with total amount of money given annually. Overall, the USA allocated by far the highest amount of money over the years, whereas EU and other countries recorded the lowest figures. Of a particular […]

Band 7+

The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010. (Figures are in millions of dollars). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table provided data the amount of spend money to developing nations in 3 countries between 2006 and 2010.Oveall, the amount of giving money in USA dominant the period following by EU and other countries with similar trend respectively In 2006, 9.8$ accounted for USA of given money following by EU with 3.1$, while the […]

Band 4+

See All

Band 7+: The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010. (Figures are in millions of dollars). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010. (Figures are in millions of dollars). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010. (Figures are in millions of dollars). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010. (Figures are in millions of dollars). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010. (Figures are in millions of dollars). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010. (Figures are in millions of dollars). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Other Topics:

The table below shows the results of a survey that asked 6800 scottish adults whether they had taken part in different cultural activties

The table compares the data of the work's large-scale and small-scale sea fishing industries.

The tables below give information about the average number of Iphones ans Samsung phones sold each day in 5 countries during 2010 and 2020.

The table below compares data for the world's large-scale and small-scale sea fishing industries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant Write at least 150 words

The table show results of 2 surveys done in 1990 and 2010 on various aspects of city living in a particular city. Units are measured in percentage. Summarise the information by selecting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table below shows the average weekly salaries of men and of women working indifferent occupations

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium