🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Line Graph

Band 6+: This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

Image for topic: This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image depicts a line graph titled "Recycling Rate for Selected Materials: 1982-2010," showing the percentage of Paper & cardboard, Glass containers, Aluminum cans, and Plastics recycled in an unnamed country over 28 years. The recycling rates in 1982 were approximately 20% for Paper & cardboard, 10% for Glass containers, 5% for Aluminum cans, and 0% for Plastics. By 2010, the rates increased to 80% for Paper & cardboard, 50% for Glass containers, 70% for Aluminum cans, and 10% for Plastics, with the highest increase observed in Aluminum cans, and Plastics starting from zero while others were already being recycled. Paper & cardboard consistently had the highest recycling rate throughout the period.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The line graph illustrates the recycling rate, as a percentage, of four types of materials (papers and cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans and plastics) for a specific country, in the period from 1982 to 2010.

Overall, paper and carboard maintained the highest recycling rate throughout the years. In contrast, plastic recycling maintained the lowest percentage, which was significantly less compared to other items. The recycling of aluminum cans and glass containers had an increasing trajectory, while some fluctuations in percentages were observed for both paper and cardboards throughout the years.

Paper and cardboards and glass containers were being recycled since 1982, In 1982, around 65 percent of paper and carboards were being recycled, while only half of the glass container in the country were processed for reuse. Both the materials experienced a temporary decline in recycling in 1990, however the rate soared both the following year. The rate of recycling reached its peak of 80 percent for paper and cardboards in the year 1994 but it experienced a steady decline and dropped to 70 percent by 2010. Meanwhile, plastic recycling steadily rose from 1194 to 2010 and accounted at 60 percent.

Aluminum recycled showed the best improvement out of all the materials. The recycling rate of this material started from around 5 percent in 1986 and grew at a steady pace till 2002, it then sharply increased to being around 45 percent by 2010. In contrast, the rate of plastic being recycled throughout the years did not improve significantly but grew from about negligible to only being close to 10 percent in 2010.

Word Count: 263

Answers On The Same Topic:

This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph compares the percentages of recycled materials, namely paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans, and plastics in a specific nation between 1982 and 2010. Overall, all categories experienced an upward trend. However, aluminium cans grew the fastest throughout. It is also noticeable that paper and cardboard were recycled the most throughout […]

This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

The line graph presents data on how the recycling rates of four different materials namely paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans, and plasticsbchanged over a period from 1982 to 2010 in one country. Overall, paper and cardboard consistently had the highest recycling rates throughout the period, despite a slight decline after a peak in […]

This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the recycling rates of four distinct materials in an unnamed country from 1982 to 2010. Overall, the data indicate substantial growth in recycling rates for most materials, particularly aluminum cans, while plastics exhibited the least progress during the observed period. In 1982, the recycling rates for paper and cardboard stood at […]

This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

The data illustrate the percentage of goods that have been recycled in four different materials over the interval between 1982 and 2010. Overall, the amount of goods recycled has increased, albeit at different rates in each material. At the beginning, the least recycled products, such as aluminum and plastics, were seen to rise in recycle […]

This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the recycling rates of four materials – paper & cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans, and plastics from 1982 to 2010 in a particular location. Overall, recycling rates for three materials improved significantly, while the rate for plastics remained unchanged over two decades. Initially, paper & cardboard and glass containers had the […]

See All

Other Topics:

The line graph shows the number of queries received by tourist information office in one city over a period of six month in 2011 .

This data presents the amount of queries received from visitors to the information office in one place over the time of 6 months in the year 2011. Overall, the way of these queries changes in each month depends on how the person delivers it to the information office.Either in person, by letter or email or […]

The graph shows information regarding new Facebook users by province in Cambodia between 2003 and 2014. Summarize the information by selection and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant

The multiple line graph encapsulates the number of new Facebook users in three cambodian provinces, namely Kampot, Phnom Penh, and Siem Reap between 2004 and 2014. The overall informarion dipicted in the collection of data that Siem Reap recored the highest figure among the other provines at the beginning of the period but withnessed a […]

The line graph shows the number of people using cars, bicycles, and buses in a European city between 2000 and 2020.

The line graph illustrates the changes in the number of peopl using different modes of transport in a Europeab City over a period of 20 years from 2000 to 2020. It compares three distincts methodes namley Cars, Bicycles and Buses, with figures expressed in number of users. Overall, it is evident that Cars consistently recorded […]

The graph shows the percantage of visiting the cinema once a month or more bewtweem 1984 to 2003

Overall, the graphs shows percentage of people with different age groups visiting the cinema once or several times in month between 1984 to 2003. The most low percent of visiting cinema have adults 35 years old and over, from 1984 to 2003 it’s grow only to 10%. And the most high percent of cinema lovers […]

the line graph which i wrote when i get bored

The supplied illustration of line graph demonstrates common carbon dioxide emmissions per person across 4 regions, such as the UK, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal from 1967 to 2007. Overall, it is obvious that the Sweden individuals produced carbon emmissions fewer than other countries, while the rate of the italians increased. With regards to Italy and […]

The graph below shows Twitter use by age group in the USA between November 2010 and May 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The multiple line graph encapsulates Twitter use divided into various group according to age in the US measured in percentages from November 2010 to May 2013. The overall information depicted in the collection of data is that, most of the mention Twitter users increase for all groupings over the given period of time. Taking a […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.