It is argued that government should not interfere in the exchange of goods between their countries and others. From my perspective, I totally disagree with this view.
On the one hand, some people believe in this strategy because of its benefits. One of them is the vigorous economic development. It is obvious that exporting domestic products to other countries can create a lucrative income. By expanding foreign trade, many enterprises have potential chances to receive famous international businesses’ approvals, and become a partner of them which is contributing to the economic development of their country. Besides, without government’s restrictions, that many national agencies have to face fierce competition to millions of foreign companies out is the significant motivation for them to renovate and make an effort to sell more commodities.
On the other hand, I would opine that its advantages pale in comparison to disadvantages. Firstly, one major demerit is the exportation of low-quality products. It is noteworthy that when selling oversea is not under control, several entrepreneurs deliberately produce inferior commodities which sell with high price. As a result, this country will be seriously criticized, and make a lot of damages to the commercial system. Another noticeable drawback is a threat to local companies. If politicians do not take over the foreign trade strictly, small firms seldom have any chances to sell their products, or advertise their brands. It can make domestic agencies on the verge of bankrupt, leading to the collapse of economy of a country.
In conclusion, government should take both external and internal marketing strategies seriously by giving some suitable restrictions and laws to balance the income between two categories of commerce.