It is widely believed that art classes provide significant impacts on children’s development. While it is true that they offer undeniable benefits for youngsters’ growth, I contend that the compulsoriness in high school is unnecessary.
To begin with, there are several advantages of teaching art for high schoolers. Firstly, art classes enhance children’s creativity and imagination by encouraging them to create unique ideas through their fresh perspectives. For instance, with a simple task of drawing a dream house, students may create different illustrations with various combinations of lines and colors. Secondly, drawing or painting classes also provide a means of self-expression and emotional outlet. It is scientifically proven that by viewing children’s works of art, parents can profoundly understand their offspring. This might positively improve the sense of mental well-being in children.
However, I would argue that these classes should not be obligatory in educational system. First, forcing young individuals to enter art sessions may lead to disengagement among those who are not interested in the subject. This might result in uncooperative behaviors and repeated absences of students when they were having these classes. Additionally, since every youngster has different passions, they should be given the right to choose subjects based on their interests and career aspirations. By promoting flexibility in education, this allows children to receive essential knowledge more effectively along with pursuing their dream jobs.
In conclusion, while it cannot be denied that art classes present certain benefits improving children’s maturation, I maintain that they should not be compulsory in high school. Moreover, schools should prioritize offering diverse opportunities for students to explore their own interests and to pursue their future paths to success.