We need negotiating both of personal and professional sides of our lifes. Since succeed in negotiating, the main aim is to be avoiding conflict. The conflict can be caused by blaming to other side or thinking just for benefit of one side. However, one can easiliy be success in natiotiating by the means of true approach. Mainly, approaches of negotiating can ben listed as hard approach, soft approach and win-wing approach.
All this approaches accept to aim of succes. Yet, “hard approach” focuses on benefits just for one side. İn the case of negotiating used hard approach, negotiator conflict with the other party and generally did not hear the needs or demands of theirs. İf they have a common problem or crisis, the negatiator will blame to others. And this attitudes will be end with conflicts so the problem or crisis become more sophisticate.
The other approach is the soft one. İn this scenerio, the negatiator will act as the opposite attitude compare with hard approach. The negatiator used soft approach generally in the intend of accepting anything, without deeply thinking of advantages/disadvantages of this thing. Because the negotiator can not endure to request of other party. Also, can not express challenges or obstacles that experienced by him/herself which caused by this problem or crisis.
Last but not least, conflicts, problems or crisis can be clearly solved by using win-win approach. This method is fruitful due to concentrating on benefits of both of sides, instead of one side. This time, the negotiator will realise all the details of the problem. And confer with others in deep empathy, rather than blaming or nervousness.This attitudes finalise with success solution for both side.