Nowadays, free education for children is applied in most world countries, however, some think that government should set aside more money to tutoring the adults. I partially agree to this suggestion because more investment in education for seniors can assist some gifted grown-ups who are needy. But in contradiction, it can also be an extra financial burden to the government.
On the one hand, supplying more investment to the adult education can create an opportunity for gifted seniors that are impoverished. Furthermore, by creating government based scholarships for mature learners, talented people can have the same academic opportunities as the wealthy who can afford tuition fees. For instance, a woman who lives in a poor living standards can build herself a new academic career with grants. When that woman has a great academic career, she can then teach others. Thus, this can create a domino effect of people educating themselves and as a result of this, a self-sustaining learning environment can emerge which can help other needy seniors. So, by giving a little push many adults can benefit.
But in the other hand, in countries that has large populations or other problems that need economic help, educating adults with the money of the government can create an extra workload for the state’s economy. In basic terms, when other critical issues have to be solved, setting aside more money for tuitoring adults is a ridiculous suggestion to make. For example, in my opinion, if a country is struggling to fix sewage system, taxpayers’ money shouldn’t be conveyed to the educating some seniors that can work and pay their own education fees.
To sum up, there are different opinions regarding giving an extra portion of the economy to the education of adults. In one side, this money can be an opportunity for the people in need. But in the other side, this can be an extra expense for the government.