The issue of the government’s expense in many sectors has been widely debated in recent years. Some people argue that government’s funds should be invested in the primary sector. I am inclined to agree with that statement that the government should prioritize sectors that have more beneficial impact.
To begin with, there are some primary sectors that the government should prioritize. Based on economic growth, there are some primary sectors, such as agriculture, industrialization, construction, health, and education. Moreover, these were sectors that most of the population worked or were involved in. For instance, if the government invests their funds in the public service or primary sector, more than half of the population will have a beneficial impact.
Furthermore, the government’s funds come from taxes, so the government should consider regulations that have positive influences on most populations. These regulations such as, build health care or school can have an impact on the new generation. It can improve student performance in school, and access to hospital or other healthcare become easier.
However, the proponents of art will argue that the government should also invest funds in this sector. Because investment in art, music and theater also can also improve the achievement or performance for people who work in this sector. For instance, they can get more recognition by the public because of better facilities.
In conclusion, while these perspectives also have their merits, I believe that the government should prioritize investing in the primary sector that can involve many people, so the population will have a beneficial impact.