It is believed that establishing the same amount of payment for all employees, regardless of job roles, would foster harmony and cooperation between staff. While it may seem that equality brings harmony, I firmly disagree with this statement.
One primary reason is that different jobs require different levels of education and qualification. Companies often allocate resources to various departments differently, based on their responsibilities and contribution. Many specialists are required to work more hours or put greater effort into their tasks, as some responsibilities demand exceptional skills such as analysing, calculating or management skills. For instance, a specialist responsible for the management of the company, who spent years at training programmes, would receive the same amount of money as someone who simply answers calls. Subsequently, treating all employees equally in terms of payment would neglect the effort of workers with outstanding abilities. As a result, this might decrease harmony, as many workers would feel resentment towards their employers and protest against that kind of policies.
Furthermore, fixed payment would discourage workers to strive harder, as there would be no promotion or special treatment for hard work. This substantially reduces competitiveness among employees, which is a key role in better performance at a workplace. Individuals would overlook their responsibilties, being aware that they will not be awarded for performing better than their colleagues. Consequently, this leads to low quality of work and poor cooperation since many specialists would slow down to match the efforts a of group.
Ultimately, I firmly disagree that paying the exact same wage would bring harmony and cooperation. Instead, it may lead to deep resentment and low effort among workers, which damages their performance and rather provokes protests.