In recent days, using the video cameras has been increased in public venues to lessen crime rates; however, opponents would consider invasive. Although there are some drawbacks, I totally agree with its positive points surpass its downsides.
Admittedly, there are basic factors that let individuals refuse these watching lenses, such as restricting privacy and misusing records. Firstly, when crowd feel that they are monitored and their actions are recorded, they will not leave their homes. Consequently, citizens may suffer from depression. For example, inhabitants tend to use online shopping for clothes instead of shopping around since they are afraid of cameras in trying rooms. Secondly, if these records are misused, and are used in wrong way, it may lead to suicide. A prime example is that what happened in Egypt, when a trainer in gym used video recorders in unethical way to get money. Hence, folk reject this method of supervision.
Nevertheless, I suppose installing these cameras plays an indispensable role in keeping the community safe and discovering offenders . To begin with, installation video cameras in streets will be a deterrent measure for criminals, as they can not commit atrocities due to their surveillance. As a result of this, the rate of crimes will be reduced additionally, people will live safely. The rate of death due to over speed has been decreased in the U.A.E, for instance , owing to radars and watching lenses that are installed everywhere. Moreover, having these equipment facilitate criminal identification. To illustrate more, the government can find the illegal person easily depending on their data; therefore, it lessens the effort and time, besides this way, it is more efficient than traditional way.
In conclusion, after this essay has manifested the benefits and drawbacks of video recording in public regions, I believe that its merits, including decreasing crime rates and assisstant tool for authority prevail their disadvantages.