It is an undeniable fact that most of the local entrepreneurs are moving to the rural areas. This essay argues that, despite some damaging effects on local people’s lives, which may be overcomed by proper maintenance, the upside, in the form of urbanization, outweighs it.
First of all, the main disadvantage of that phenomenon is based on the inconvenience for residents of urban areas. To illustrate, an average person with a hectic lifestyle is used to a convenient location of some facilities, like supermarkets. That one doesn’t have enough time and energy to go to the countryside to buy ordinary milk, for example. Thus, this one will face some challenges, which will reduce his satisfaction with his own life. However, that drawback will be erased, if not all entrepreneurs relocate to rural areas, thereby the city’s residents will have easy access to diverse facilities.
On the other hand, that phenomenon, also known as urbanization, which modifications in the business’s policy may positively affect economic growth in the countryside. The relocation would increase the quality of life for those, who don’t have the opportunity to purchase basic items in cities. For example, the village Satpaev, in Central Kazakhstan wasn’t renowned by its local scientists, 10 years ago, before urbanization. Now, this small village has transformed into a city, which has all the necessary establishments and facilities to make life there comfortable. Thus the movement of local businesses to a new area may affect positively on people’s lives, which consequently will foster the sustainable growth of the country in the social field and economic fields as well.
In conclusion, the relocation of businesses has more significant advantage rather than disadvantage. This essay believes that the process itself will also positively affect the population’s life in every scope.