Opinions are divided on whether the authorities should spend large amounts of money on the arts, or if such financial resources ought to be dedicated to health care and education instead. My opinion is that both viewpoints are valid, and countries should consider their needs and distribute their budgets accordingly.
In many countries, the arts receive considerable funding because of they play an important role in preserving and promoting cultural heritage. Examples of this include Korea and China, where both traditional art forms and contemporary ones receive substantial financial support. Not only does this policy keep unique traditions in these countries alive and relevant in today’s world, but it also attracts foreigners, who are interested in the values promoted by the arts. In fact, Korean and Chinese films and music have captivated millions of viewers in other countries, increasing the appeal of their exports and raising revenue as a result.
On the other hand, there are also compelling arguments in favor of funding medical care and education. This is because in less developed countries, the delivery of these essential public services is genuinely subpar. People have limited access to medical care and educational opportunities, while doctors, medical staff, and teachers are underpaid and considering leaving their professions. Thus, investing in hospitals and schools, as well as raising the salaries of doctors and teachers, are important remedies that help to improve the quality of essential services, which would contribute to uplifting people’s quality of life.
On balance, I acknowledge the validity of both viewpoints and my opinion is that countries ought to divert resources towards areas that need more support. If essential public services are lacking, governments should invest more in them to address people’s practical needs. If these services are already adequate, money can be allocated more to the arts for the purpose of conserving and promoting cultural values, which can also create opportunities for economic development.