In many parts of the world, the practice of organizing buildings such as residential houses, schools, commercial shops and offices in different areas separated from one another has become increasingly widespread. Although this trend is tended to improve the urban infrastructure, its drawbacks far outweigh its benefits.
On the one hand, there are several advantages to systematic zoning of dwelling areas and public buildings into clearly defined districts. The implementation of this policy transforms residential areas into much quitter places to live, consequently improving the quality of life to their inhabitants safety. Another significant advantage is the efficient land use that can ensure the order and public. For example, shops and retail outlets can be concentrated in one designated area with adequate parking spaces and easy access to public transport. Furthermore, placing office and business centers separately increase the productivity while fostering a more professional environment.
However, I would argue that segregating residential zones, office premises and markets into specific places has more disadvantages. Firstly, the necessity for people to commute over long distances for their basic needs not only consumes considerable time, but also escalates daily transportation costs. Moreover, the concentration of similar services in one particular area can give a rise to overcrowding and traffic congestions during rush hours there by resulting in stress and anxiety. Lastly, the dependence on private cars to move between various locations can lead to a notable increase in air pollution.
In conclusion, although dividing the city zones into distinct locations provides a number of merits such as safety and peace, disadvantages that come along including traffic congestion, inefficient time use and environmental damage are more substantial.