Across many countries the government decided to add a policy, which promotes public transport as the main type of transportation, and declined the use of private cars. In my view, this law has more disadvantages than the advantages due to its usage in the society.
There are some pros of this approach such as environmental benefits and economic growth. If people were to go to somewhere by buses and trains, it would lead to an increase of economy thanks to their cost effectiveness. For example, in Kazakhstan public transport require 100 tenge that considered as a minimal price for residents. Moreover, this way plays a vital role in protecting our environment, reducing carbon dioxide, metan and toxic gases. For instance, a recent study in France showed that public transports enviromentally friendly, and illustrated a result around at 76% rather than private vehicles. Therefore, they have been the one of justified decisions for government.
In contrast, its cons far outweigh advantages, leading to impressive disagreements in some countries. This is mainly because of favorable conditions which given by cars. They provide access to feel a comfort atmosphere during the trips. Furthermore, vechicles ownership can be used to deliver passagers into required places. For example, the government from Italy demonstrated that 82% of good feedbaks were shared by individuals, who used private transport and taxis. It means that, they involve the best opportunities for people and make sense of safety rather than public ones.
In conclusion, although public transport has a great impact on enhancing our economy, it also has more disadvantages. Consequently, its actions outweigh pros that give us ecological and less expensive transport. Nevertheless, cars would be more accurate in the terms of usage and comfortable.