The globe has surge in travelling among various parts of the world which has led to exchange of various cultures and even threats among the nations. I would advocate that both the statements have their own arguments which has been reflected in the further paragraphs.
The foremost point of sharing the belief of foreign countries would be the logic of principle. This means that there are spaces of features which has access to the decisions made and result observed over the decades and centuries. For instance, Dubai has a history of slave nation which turned into a golden country after the King took a step of finding out the oil by digging up the soil by 3000feets. Analyzing this perspective, other countries can search for better alternatives with the thought of Dubai.
On the flip side, it can enhance the chance of risk to the people of home-country. There are umpteen numbers of criminal activities observed. Developing nations migrate for better standard of living to the developed countries. This results in earning capital through unethical ways which can create a massive destruction among the developed ones. Conjointly, the language barriers and the lifestyle might affect both the individuals. This includes the gestures that some nations could easily handle whilst the others could feel it offensive. For instance, touching the other gender in India can result in chaos among one another. On the other hand, people from states greet opposite sex by having a hug.
To recapitulate, my vote stands with both the perspectives due to their own viewpoints. It is beneficial to overlook both the sides while considering a particular topic. However, any judgement supporting a specific stand would log in a biasness for the overall chapter.